One of my biggest things about a harem is the winner. And by winner I mean it not being totally and completely obvious that tsundere first girl MC meets is the preferred girl I like harems where I honestly cannot tell if any one girl is going to actually wins the guy's affections. If it is totally obvious that that one certain girl is clearly the only one that even matters, then the rest of the girls are background noise till MC and that girl confess.This is actually a question I've been wanting to discuss, because certain genres - harem (romantic comedy), slice of life/moe (daily life) and ecchi/fanservice - are often assumed to be inherently bad in discussion, giving them a handicap to overcome that doesn't seem to be imposed on other genres. I wonder if it's a coincidence that all of them involve heavy amounts of female characters.
Which is one of the things that annoys me. The focus in these series is supposed to be on the girls, and that's not a bad thing. But people get preoccupied with the main/male lead, and usually how he's not confident or "badass" enough. Which I find, to be blunt, stupid. To bring up a point of comparison, both my favorite and my least favorite character for examples are played by the same guy.
Acchi Kocchi's Io is a good example of what a character should be like. He's confident and sure, a little dense, but his biggest trait is his kind heart. Hagure Yuusha's Akatsuki is actually the first character in a harem/fantasy anime I can remember actively disliking. That harassment scene at the start of episode 2 - which, by the method of not being an accident was genuinely off-putting - was something that my impression of him never recovered from. He doesn't look like a "badass", he looks like a creep.
I get that people want girls to be stronger characters, but if we're really going to go that route, than more people should be okay with guys being weaker characters as well. Those who help people in anime don't have always have an ulterior motive, and if they do, it can be a flaw used for interesting storytelling. Even if it's an action series, a character should be defined by how they are off the battlefield, not on it.
Mostly I just want the genres I like, and the ones that I feel represent anime to me, should get a little more respect and not have this "guilty until proven innocent" stigma. Something shouldn't be good in spite of being a harem series, it should be good because it's a harem series. Even last season's Gaworare managed to take that familiarity and play with it in an interesting way.
I get why things like sci-fi and action and whatnot have their appeal in the Western fandom, but separating everything that's not those into a sort of second class that has an artificially higher hurdle to clear in order to be considered "good" or "legit good", however subjective those are, isn't exactly fair.
He's actually the one protagonist I really, really dislike.
Using gintama in a discussion about anime is cheating
Beside this was obviously a DECONSTRUCTION of the harem genre.
That's why I prefer Issei to Akatsuki every time. Issei cries with Rias once for emotional support. He frequently makes himself look like a dork. He does some dumb things. But even when he's perverted, his intentions are never to cause trouble for anyone. He has empathy.I love that kind of harem show and protagonist.
But they're romantic comedies. The comedy is just as important as the romance. The other girls can be there to bring out things about the main couple, and be compelling in their own right even if they don't win. Romance is an endgame, but it's not always the endgame.If it is totally obvious that that one certain girl is clearly the only one that even matters, then the rest of the girls are background noise till MC and that girl confess.
What's a "good" harem anyway? lol
Exactly.The release is really bare bones. I would of accepted it being DVD only if they did something like they did with Magi and Blast of Tempest which had decent packaging for just being DVD only.
As more and more CG work is undertaken with well financed projects I think the overall quality of CG animation in Japan will rise as the talent pool improves. however, keeping anime CG distinctive from other CG will be the main challenge. Anime has a "look" that sets it apart.
You must have really liked TWGOK too.
This is hilarious yet true.
One of my favorite harem protags is Tomoki from Sora No Otoshimono. While it is still a fanservice filled "trashy" harem show, this one is pretty self aware, and Tomoki is actually a likable lecher as opposed to a dumb chick magnet. He has a fun personality and knows what he wants, but still has a kind heart and cares for people. I love that kind of harem show and protagonist.
What's the point of a strong harem protagonist if he's just as dickless as any other harem protagonist though? The reason why School Days guy is interesting is because he acts on his sexual desires.
I've linked this article before, but I feel it's relevant. And it ties into some of what I was saying about demographics yesterday. Anime is a lot broader than people give it credit for.This is funny because i never considered Sora no otoshimo to be harem , just a very good comedy.heck from whaty i've read of the manga it is just so on the opposite fo what a harem lead is that i have a hard time accepting him as a harem lead.
Because sex isn't everything in a relationship? In a story-driven eroge, the H-scenes rarely take up that much time. They can reaffirm the couples' relationship, but it's not the reason why they're together or even the end goal.What's the point of a strong harem protagonist if he's just as dickless as any other harem protagonist though? The reason why School Days guy is interesting is because he acts on his sexual desires.
What's the point of a strong harem protagonist if he's just as dickless as any other harem protagonist though? The reason why School Days guy is interesting is because he acts on his sexual desires.
That falls into the old trap of "If they actually acted like young people then it might as well be hentai."What's the point of a strong harem protagonist if he's just as dickless as any other harem protagonist though? The reason why School Days guy is interesting is because he acts on his sexual desires.
I honestly really enjoyed Ai yori aoshi. It was at times a beautiful series. but harem wasnt the real focus and more of a side distraction, as realistically, no girl had a chance other than Aoi herself.
I've linked this article before, but I feel it's relevant. And it ties into some of what I was saying about demographics yesterday. Anime is a lot broader than people give it credit for.
Because sex isn't everything in a relationship? In a story-driven eroge, the H-scenes rarely take up that much time. They can reaffirm the couples' relationship, but it's not the reason why they're together or even the end goal.
What's the point of a strong harem protagonist if he's just as dickless as any other harem protagonist though? The reason why School Days guy is interesting is because he acts on his sexual desires.
But if it satisfies all the requirements for a harem and plays within the rules of that genre but is still enjoyable, what's the shame in calling it one? It shouldn't be an insult.I wouldn't call Henneko a harem but there's no wrong choice for girls and MC's a likable doofus (Yuki Kaiji pls only play these characters forever). Based King of Steeeeeeeeeeeel.
But if it satisfies all the requirements for a harem and plays within the rules of that genre but is still enjoyable, what's the shame in calling it one? It shouldn't be an insult.
Easier for the audience to identify with.
Can't you just type the name of the show instead of being a smartass and post a one second long GIF? I mean what is that? Golden Boy? Some of us don't have encyclopedic knowledge of everything that encompasses anime, nor have the long term memory of shows that aired in the past century.
Easier for the audience to identify with.
I think it just leans more on comedy than anything else!But if it satisfies all the requirements for a harem and plays within the rules of that genre but is still enjoyable, what's the shame in calling it one? It shouldn't be an insult.
Ending killed all hope of it ever being considered good anything in my book.Would Negima be considered an example of a good harem? It provides two very good reasons for Negi not to choose a true partner, and many of the characters have good backstories and character development. And Negi himself is quite the badass.
Of course, talking about the manga here.
My bad.
I used to be like you....then I figured you could have google search the image/gif. You could also ask
Exactly.
I wouldn't call Henneko a harem but there's no wrong choice for girls and MC's a likable doofus (Yuki Kaiji pls only play these characters forever). Based King of Steeeeeeeeeeeel.
This is a show I never watched and never had a urge to watch, as often as people it may recommend. Something just holds me back there.
I feel that if the MC is confident enough to keep going ( because that what he is , because he can do it or whatever ) That's much more intrestingWhat's the point of a strong harem protagonist if he's just as dickless as any other harem protagonist though? The reason why School Days guy is interesting is because he acts on his sexual desires.
I've linked this article before, but I feel it's relevant. And it ties into some of what I was saying about demographics yesterday. Anime is a lot broader than people give it credit for.
Like I said, most harem anime are classified under romantic comedy, and having more comedy than romance doesn't necessarily disqualify it.I think it just leans more on comedy than anything else!
Though this phrasing still seems to imply that "becoming [a harem]" is a bad thing. It's an issue in the anime fanbase that's never gone away, and I really want to argue against. Not even playing devil's advocate, but earnestly.Henneko was a glorious example of harem characteristics working for a show without becoming one.
My bad.
I used to be like you....then I figured you could have google search the image/gif. You could also ask
Like I said, most harem anime are classified under romantic comedy, and having more comedy than romance doesn't necessarily disqualify it.
And even if the lead isn't perverted/decisive, that shouldn't be a negative. Machismo is an ultimately futile goal to strive for, and even in cases where characters are praised for that, I try to see it another way. I didn't like F/Z's Rider because he was a bro or badass, I liked him because he was magnanimous.
Though this phrasing still seems to imply that "becoming [a harem]" is a bad thing. It's an issue in the anime fanbase that's never gone away, and I really want to argue against. Not even playing devil's advocate, but earnestly.
Agreed.Negima is shit and Ken Akamatsu is a hack
Can you stop bringing SAO into this?If we're going the strength and decisive route, then that would mean that Kirito-kun is the best lead in a harem. It's the smartest anime I have seen in a while.
Would Negima be considered an example of a good harem? It provides two very good reasons for Negi not to choose a true partner, and many of the characters have good backstories and character development. And Negi himself is quite the badass.
Of course, talking about the manga here.
Ending killed all hope of it ever being considered good anything in my book.
What makes it not one?Its not that being a harem is bad in that case just Henneko isnt actually one.
I checked the source and it was a tumblr file name. I just don't understand why you would take the effort to find, copy and paste the url of a GIF, which isn't even supposed to be funny, instead of typing a few words, which is much more informative. Maybe I'm just too old for this world. /oldmanyellsatcloud
What's a "good" harem anyway? lol
urusei yatsura still da best harem ( ≖‿≖
Give me my animated Poooooooooooooolt.Monster Musume no Iru Nichijou will be the best harem when it gets adapted.
*searches wiki*
hmmm this looks surprisingly good.