Super Mario Odyssey | Switch VS Switch 2 | Final Graphics Comparison

yeah yeah, not my native language and i try not to use translator so i can practice, so it ll have some misspellings here and there

Bad ➡️ Worse ➡️ Worst
Good ➡️ Better ➡️ Best
Large ➡️ Larger ➡️ Largest

if it ends with -st it is always the superlative. if it ends with anything else, it's the comparative.
hat's the 1 thing English does that isn't convoluted nonsense
 
Bad ➡️ Worse ➡️ Worst
Good ➡️ Better ➡️ Best
Large ➡️ Larger ➡️ Largest

if it ends with -st it is always the superlative. if it ends with anything else, it's the comparative.
hat's the 1 thing English does that isn't convoluted nonsense
it was just a hook mistake, but thanks for take your time to help me :pie_sfwth:
 
Don't think I will ever get over how big a difference just bumping up the resolution can bring. Can't wait for tomorrow.
 
Thats looks like a decent update, unlike that shit Pokemon Scarlet nothing update.

I mean, it not running at sub 30fps with 2fps animations, but instead at 60fps with full framerate animations is a pretty big upgrade I'd say.

you always have to take into account what the starting point of each game is. imagine how badly these Pokemon games are made that they ran like they did on Switch 1.
they can't fix the entire engine for a patch after all lol.

comparatively to the graphics, Pokemon Scarlet should have run at 60fps on Switch 1 already the way it looks 🙃
 
Last edited:
I mean, it not running at sub 30fps with 2fps animations, but instead at 60fps with full framerate animations is a pretty big upgrade I'd say.

you always have to take into account what the starting point of each game is. imagine how badly these Pokemon games are made that they ran like they did on Switch 1.
they can't fix the entire engine for a patch after all lol.

comparatively to the graphics, Pokemon Scarlet should have run at 60fps on Switch 1 already the way it looks 🙃

The game shouldn't be release on that state and the update is literally force bruting the game as PC does with emulators.

Just because the game runs super bad doesn't mean the update is good, just means the NS2 is a great machine. This update is what the base game should be to begin with.
 
The game shouldn't be release on that state and the update is literally force bruting the game as PC does with emulators.

Just because the game runs super bad doesn't mean the update is good, just means the NS2 is a great machine. This update is what the base game should be to begin with.

you are right, but you have unrealistic expectations if you expected Gamefreak would release a better patch lol.
 
Nice! The super low resolution and jaggies stood out like a sore thumb, making the game unenjoyable to play on TV to say the least. Cool!
 
DLSS4 magic

I doubt this upgrades uses DLSS4 because the game doesn't have TAA in the first place

Edit: yeah I can confirm this is not using DLSS, in the city you can still see jaggies everywhere
 
Last edited:
soon

giphy.gif
 
So why is this a free upgrade while the Zelda games aren't? Mario is an equally big game. They even share the engine (albeit most likely modified).
As the others said, I guess it's the APP,

But I also think that's because BOTW and TOTK where the most popular games of the switch 1 AND they had huge framerates problems, so I guess going from sub 900p/30fps with big drops to 1440p/60fps stable is more impressive than 900p/60fps stable to 1440p/60fps stable, they made people pay for the the most significant update.

Do we have to pay for the Pokémon games updates BTW? Because the Zeldas looked butterly smooth compared to that mess.
 
Top Bottom