Super Smash Bros. for 3DS and Wii U Thread 5: Yarning for Yoshi

As much as people want to believe slots don't exist, developing characters takes time. So when time isn't put into a character you don't care for, there's a chance another character you do care for will get that time.

It has nothing to do with wanting to screw someone over, it's just that they can't put every character that everyone wants in.
They don't. You're talking about time constraints and a priority list of what characters should be worked on first.
 
My thought process is to have characters that are actually relevant at the time the game comes out, important to their franchises or to Nintendo's history. Lucario doesn't really fit any of those added on to the fact that I personally don't care for him and would rather have a more meaningful pokemon representative who could provide a newer more unique experience.

The same goes for Toon Link who should have had his own unique items and not the recycled boomerang, bomb, etc. And Wolf and Falco as well. I'm not going to get into a clone debate in this thread, but my point of view is that.

Just like there are fans of those characters there are people who don't like them and wouldn't mind seeing them either replaced by new ones or completely reworked.
Lucario is very relevant. He had his own character arc in Pokemon X/Y and given that very few pokemon get any sort of spotlight is very telling. He's still used quite a bit in marketing and merchandise as well. He was used to market D/P, B2/W2 & X/Y.

I do agree that I wish Toon Link was reworked a little bit to make him more unique. I still have my fingers crossed for Ganondorf.
 
They don't. You're talking about time constraints and a priority list of what characters should be worked on first.

Right. It's not literally 'slots', they don't have a set number of places of characters. But if they decide to cut a character, they have more time to put in other ones.
 
As much as people want to believe slots don't exist, developing characters takes time. So when time isn't put into a character you don't care for, there's a chance another character you do care for will get that time.

It has nothing to do with wanting to screw someone over, it's just that they can't put every character that everyone wants in.

That's why priority list exists for characters. Most of newcomers and popular Veterans are top of the list. when they ran out of time adding characters then the characters that are on bottom of list would get cut.
 
Along with Dedede I think Little Mac is the best Neorice smash sprite yet, it catches that tough determination.

None, except Ganondorf with his moveset. Please change it up when he returns.

Ganondorf ain't Ganondorf without the Wizards Foot.

Clearly there's one way we can solve this dilemma, throw out your Toon Zelda theories, it's all about dual swords Toon Ganondorf alongside veteran TP Dorf, Zelda series duplicates everywhere!
 
so can we just assume that the guy who predicted wii fit trainer, villager, megaman, little mac, etc is legit?

Haven't really thought otherwise since E3. I just hope that wasn't the full list of newcomers. (edit: I need to lay off the drugs)

PS: I can't wait for the shitstorm when Mii gets announced
 
Yea, that is a great sprite by Neorice.

It also captures how small Little Mac is lol.
Lucario is very relevant. He had his own character arc in Pokemon X/Y and given that very few pokemon get any sort of spotlight is very telling. He's still used quite a bit in marketing and merchandise as well. He was used to market D/P, B2/W2 & X/Y.
No matter how many times this is said, it will fall on to willfully ignorant people. :/
Right. It's not literally 'slots', they don't have a set number of places of characters. But if they decide to cut a character, they have more time to put in other ones.
Yea, I could tell that's what you meant, but when it is worded like that, we're just going to get some people who interpret that stuff as Lucario replaced Mewtwo or something.

Sorry if I sounded harsh in my previous post. I really don't like the whole "what characters do you not want to see return" as if that is something really meaningful. People can not like characters, but they shouldn't be selfish in wanting the roster to only appeal to them.
 
I will never understand this mentality. Why would you WANT any characters to be cut/not return? All it does is screw over fans of those characters. There is literally no positive side to it.

Well, it's cause I don't much care about other fans of characters. As a gamer, not a game-maker, I have the luxury of only caring about my personal experience with the game! And Snake being there bugs me. I'd be happier if he were out. I can stomach him as a one time "oh he he it's Snake" novelty, but he does not need to be a regular. He can come and go, thank you very much.
 
As much as people want to believe slots don't exist, developing characters takes time. So when time isn't put into a character you don't care for, there's a chance another character you do care for will get that time.

It has nothing to do with wanting to screw someone over, it's just that they can't put every character that everyone wants in.

Okay, so even if "slots" exist (and I'm not convinced), I think it's a safe bet that at this point, most if not all of us have at least one or two characters we're really happy about being in. We've all been pleased to some extent. What's with the mentality that "EVERY character must make me happy and fuck everyone else?" I don't personally care about Lucario, or Pikmin & Olimar, or Villager, or a couple of other characters. But that doesn't mean I view them as "wasted slots" because I recognize that (a) these characters are important to other people and (b) they're important to Nintendo's history/brand, thus they're not "wasted" just because they personally don't appeal to me.

My thought process is to have characters that are actually relevant at the time the game comes out, important to their franchises or to Nintendo's history. Lucario doesn't really fit any of those added on to the fact that I personally don't care for him and would rather have a more meaningful pokemon representative who could provide a newer more unique experience.

The same goes for Toon Link who should have had his own unique items and not the recycled boomerang, bomb, etc. And Wolf and Falco as well. I'm not going to get into a clone debate in this thread, but my point of view is that.

Just like there are fans of those characters there are people who don't like them and wouldn't mind seeing them either replaced by new ones or completely reworked.

I actually agree with you about Toon Link. I'm glad he's in at all, but he should have had his own move set from The Wind Waker/Phantom Hourglass/Spirit Tracks. I also agree that this is not the time to get into a clone debate.

I do disagree with you about Lucario, though. He had his own entire character arc in Pokémon X and Y, making him incredibly relevant and timely both to Pokémon and Nintendo. It's almost a given that Mega Lucario will be implemented into his move set in Smash 4 (Final Smash?), meaning that there really is no way you can argue that Lucario isn't relevant right now. He just is, and I don't think there's any reason his return threatents Mewtwo's return either.

More than that, though, you must have at least one or two characters you're personally really happy about in Smash, right? Then be happy about them. Why not do that instead of actively hoping for other characters to be cut (and, by extension, their fans to be disappointed, even if you don't actively want that)?

Well, it's cause I don't much care about other fans of characters. As a gamer, not a game-maker, I have the luxury of only caring about my personal experience with the game! And Snake being there bugs me. I'd be happier if he were out. I can stomach him as a one time "oh he he it's Snake" novelty, but he does not need to be a regular. He can come and go, thank you very much.

Then that's where we differ, I guess. I realize that Smash is a big deal to a lot of people and Nintendo fans, and I'd rather as many people as possible be pleased with it than just me. I've got my Mega Man, Rosalina, Toon Link, and Zelda... I've been spoiled already and am fucking over-the-moon hyped for Smash as a result, and it's a great feeling. I'd rather as many people have this feeling as possible than get five more newcomers/veterans that appeal only to me.
 
My thought process is to have characters that are actually relevant at the time the game comes out, important to their franchises or to Nintendo's history. Lucario doesn't really fit any of those added on to the fact that I personally don't care for him and would rather have a more meaningful pokemon representative who could provide a newer more unique experience.

600px-448Lucario-Mega.png


He got a Mega form in Gen VI and was one of the first shown regarding this new mechanic. Not only that, but he's a popular Pokémon and had a role in XY.

Haven't really thought otherwise since E3. I just hope that wasn't the full list of newcomers.

Zeeroid pls

main.png
 
Okay, so even if "slots" exist (and I'm not convinced), I think it's a safe bet that at this point, most if not all of us have at least one or two characters we're really happy about being in. We've all been pleased to some extent. What's with the mentality that "EVERY character must make me happy and fuck everyone else?" I don't personally care about Lucario, or Pikmin & Olimar, or Villager, or a couple of other characters. But that doesn't mean I view them as "wasted slots" because I recognize that (a) these characters are important to other people and (b) they're important to Nintendo's history/brand, thus they're not "wasted" just because they personally don't appeal to me.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I just think some people are being overly sensitive to people saying they don't really want a character in. Some people may be a little overzealous with outwardly wishing for cuts, too.

But it really doesn't matter in the end. The roster will not end up being completely tailored to a certain group. The series always has been fairly varied in characters.
 
List of DO NOT WANTS

Waluigi
Pac Man
Sonic's other shitty friends
Birdo
Ghriahim
etc.

Indifferent
Ridley
etc.

Bring in Saki Amamiya or his kid, W101, Snake, Bayonetta AT, Zone of the Enders, Advance Wars, Fire Emblem.

#TeamFake but I do want Palutena in the game.
Why would anyone have a "do not want" list? That's dumb. I didn't want Wolf, but his inclusion didn't really make Brawl an inferior experience.

The ability to cancel out hitstun after 13 frames (~20th of a second) during knockback with an airdodge or 25 frames in with an attack just speaks volumes about how defensive and non combo orientated Brawl was.
13 frames is just over a fifth of a second, not a twentieth.

Has BiTF made a new comic yet?
Yes, but not about Mac.
Alt:
Okay, fine, you still want a Valentine's Day theme with this one? ''As Ganondorf and Bowser shook mighty hands, their eyes met for the first time. Initially thinking he got the better end of the deal, Bowser could suddenly only focus on one thing: the impressive fullness of Ganondorf's eyebrows, poetically mirroring his own. Ganondorf, meanwhile, had never felt the ironclad grip of a spiny turtle monster before, and was instantly impressed. As his thoughts wavered from his plan to defeat Link, he slowly began to wonder what his new friend's scaly arms would feel like gently wrapped around his shoulders…''

I will never understand this mentality. Why would you WANT any characters to be cut/not return? All it does is screw over fans of those characters. There is literally no positive side to it.
Frankly, I don't really get the mentality of not wanting specific characters in the game at all, whether they're veterans or newcomers. I don't think there's any character in Nintendo's roster or the available third-party roster that I hate so much that I would be vehemently opposed to their inclusion (which probably means there is such a character and I haven't figured out who it is yet, but still). Plus, I tend to find people who go on and on at length about how much they hate [character] exceedingly insufferable. Why focus so much on the negatives?

Serious question: how would you feel if this lovely piece of Yoshi's New Island music made it into the 3DS Smash?
This isn't SomethingAwful, you don't need to use their swear filter. You're allowed to say "shitty".
 
Okay, so even if "slots" exist (and I'm not convinced), I think it's a safe bet that at this point, most if not all of us have at least one or two characters we're really happy about being in. We've all been pleased to some extent. What's with the mentality that "EVERY character must make me happy and fuck everyone else?" I don't personally care about Lucario, or Pikmin & Olimar, or Villager, or a couple of other characters. But that doesn't mean I view them as "wasted slots" because I recognize that (a) these characters are important to other people and (b) they're important to Nintendo's history/brand, thus they're not "wasted" just because they personally don't appeal to me.

Well, is not like Sakurai goes to Iwata and says "Hey so for this smash bros I think I'll get new characters, I'll decide how many later". They have a budget and a plan, and they have an idea of how many chars and modes they want to work on before starting the proyect. They could ask for more money/time to work on extra things like more characters, but time and money are not infinite, and they cant keep adding things forever. So a "slot" = time and money to work on a character/feature that could be used on other character/feature/testing time, and thats why people will go "they should have added ridley instead of wii fit trainer", meanign the time and money spend on making that character should have been used on that other character, if there were no slots any character and feature could get in.

Then again this is Sakurai, so Iwata is probably like "money is not a problem"
 
You only needed to have a Super Mario Galaxy save file to unlock Rosalina.

But no one played Super Mario Galaxy though.

My favorite thing about the rosalina reveal thread is people claiming to not knowing who she is from a mario game that sold over 10 million on a video game forum.
 
Why would anyone have a "do not want" list? That's dumb. I didn't want Wolf, but his inclusion didn't really make Brawl an inferior experience.

13 frames is just over a fifth of a second, not a twentieth.

Yes, but not about Mac.
Alt:
Okay, fine, you still want a Valentine's Day theme with this one? ''As Ganondorf and Bowser shook mighty hands, their eyes met for the first time. Initially thinking he got the better end of the deal, Bowser could suddenly only focus on one thing: the impressive fullness of Ganondorf's eyebrows, poetically mirroring his own. Ganondorf, meanwhile, had never felt the ironclad grip of a spiny turtle monster before, and was instantly impressed. As his thoughts wavered from his plan to defeat Link, he slowly began to wonder what his new friend's scaly arms would feel like gently wrapped around his shoulders…''

Frankly, I don't really get the mentality of not wanting specific characters in the game at all, whether they're veterans or newcomers. I don't think there's any character in Nintendo's roster or the available third-party roster that I hate so much that I would be vehemently opposed to their inclusion (which probably means there is such a character and I haven't figured out who it is yet, but still). Plus, I tend to find people who go on and on at length about how much they hate [character] exceedingly insufferable. Why focus so much on the negatives?

This isn't SomethingAwful, you don't need to use their swear filter. You're allowed to say "shitty".

I like the idea of a bar where all the nintendo villains hang out.
 
Compiled all the newcomer splash screens so far. I definitely prefer this over the "NEWCOMER: [Character]" that Brawl did.


I'm actually a bit surprised at the fact that Mac's wasn't "Little Mac enters the ring!"
 
My thought process is to have characters that are actually relevant at the time the game comes out, important to their franchises or to Nintendo's history. Lucario doesn't really fit any of those added on to the fact that I personally don't care for him and would rather have a more meaningful pokemon representative who could provide a newer more unique experience.
.

You mean the one who has a major story point in XY and has been a major pokemon mascot for years.

You saying things doesn't make them the popular opinion, or gaf in general.

To be blunt, lucario is popular as all hell and is probably more important than any other pokemon you want in, in the eyes of the pokemon company and fanbase in general . And that's just it, you gonna have to come to terms with that. People en masse like that thing you don't like and the pokemon company is selling to them.
 
I think Lucario gets a lot of hate because he's from a recent, relatively young series.

But to put it in perspective, just because he wasn't around since RBY doesn't mean he's somewhat unqualified to be part of Smash. In a way he's like Wario or Yoshi, came in later in his respective series, but proved to be popular.
 
I think Lucario gets a lot of hate because he's from a recent, relatively young series.

But to put it in perspective, just because he wasn't around since RBY doesn't mean he's somewhat unqualified to be part of Smash. In a way he's like Wario or Yoshi, came in later in his respective series, but proved to be popular.
I think its because pokemon has changed, and people need to point their disposition on change in a place.

So lucario, because the furries like him, or he is edgy ( what the fuck even is edgy now ), or he isn't important even though he sells shit or whatever dumb excuse of the day is.
 
Thanks for the compliments on the Mac sprite!

I actually treat Newcomers as a leg up above the others so try to do my absolute best to make their sprites as solid as possible. Did so with both Rosalina & Lil Mac.
 
Having a 'Do Not Want List' is very fair honestly. It isn't like characters are free, they take considerable development resources. I look at like less like a 'no characters!' list and more like a 'I'd rather them use resources on something else' list.
 
Top Bottom