So this is not a response to beelz, but rather clarification, because I feel like I need to clarify.
I'm a very logical person. Logic is important to me, so when I see someone trying to pass off a fallacy as a legitimate argument, I feel the need to correct them. However, correcting someone's flawed logic followed by that person defending said logic is not a productive way to debate. I find myself in these kinds of situations constantly (on the internet) because the internet is filled with people of all different levels of comprehension and debate skills. There's no use arguing with someone who's not even on the same page as you, so sometimes the best thing to do in that situation is to ignore them (psychically or electronically) no matter how much you feel the need to correct them.
On topic: I think Sakurai thinks that the Final Destination versions of stages allows him to make most of the stages gimmicky without people caring. I have no problem with gimmicky stages, but stages with unpredictable hazards and things of that nature are not fun to play on. I hope he finds a good balance. I'm okay with Kamek changing the layout, but I hope Nabbit doesn't interrupt the flow.
