JediLink
Member
I don't think we're on the same page here. This has nothing to do with Smash 4 or how the game should be made or anything like that. I'm talking about the general hatred of competitive Smash by the greater public. That's where the casual elitist talk is stemming from. This is the article that spurred everything. Prime example:You're assuming I'm a casual here. The "real men use items" 'meme' is pretty tongue-in-cheek. I'm just saying that the top minority clamoring for separatist exclusivity and dominance in contrast to the vocal minority WITHIN the majority clamoring for inclusive traits speaks volumes. Let's say that the "real men use items" crowd was serious? That just creates another branch of elitism with a different ruleset, i.e. they're not 'true casuals' because they've formed a concrete opinion. It just so happens that in this specific scenario (smash bros) that the top players have a ruleset that opposes the forementioned ruleset andthose pushing the opinion have forfeited their status as a 'casual participant' as a result.
Some random douche said:I love Melee. That was THE game to play when I was in college. I bombed my buddies' stupid wave dashing Foxes right off of Final Destination with Link soooooo many times... I'll say to you what I said to all my friends:
Wave dashing, L-cancelling, and "no items" SHATTERS any semblance of balance the game was supposed to have. If those three things aren't used, the game is actually incredibly balanced, and — I can't stress this next part enough — THE BEST PLAYER STILL PRETTY MUCH ALWAYS WINS. All those things do is make the game less interesting and harder to play. Period, end of story.
Oh, and you know what I mean when I say "casual". I'm talking about people who just play the game for fun and aren't into advanced tactics and all that jazz.