No, their methodology was bad. You do not mess up this big in primary history.
You have 4 polls saying Hillary wins by 20%. (example)
Exactly what other outcome based on all that evidence do you go with??
No, their methodology was bad. You do not mess up this big in primary history.
Nate Silver walking it back, lol
Mmmhmm
The man has a hard time admitting when he's wrong. Nothing new here.
Trust who/what?What does this massive upset mean for Clinton's polling in other States? Should we trust them, or is it anyone's game at this point?
Cruz up in Idaho, Trump in third.
I'm calling it:
November 2016
Sanders VS Kasich VS Trump
Schattenjäger;197933669 said:We aren't talking about me
We are talking about the millions of votes already placed for trump
They did? They can only go on what the polls are saying.
What, you expected them to predict this based on all the polls being in Clintons favour??
18-29 turned out equal to 65+, nice.
Interesting analysis by Chuck Todd on MSNBC.
Basically, tonight's MI results reveal signs that Hillary falters among demographics for whom Bernie (and Trump) really resonate. So maybe someone like Julian Castro for VP is out and someone more Rust Belt/middle class-minded like Sherrod Brown is in.
So Wayne County is at 75% ie 180k votes, so let's make a broad assumption and assume another 60k votes up for grabs.
If Hillary continues with her 60% win of that 60k, she gets 36k to Bernie's 24k. That's a 12k gap closure.
He's currently ahead by 24.5k, though.
So Hillary needs a miracle of votes to turn this around. In other words, almost none of Detroit reporting.
This is my guess. Young voters are particularly likely to lack partisan affiliation, and smart groundwork in Michigan gave him a competitive edge in an open primary (particularly among suburban kids who aren't black).
Hillary can still win the state, but that seems less likely with every minute. Even if this is another Iowa for Bernie, anything other than a large Hillary win is a problem for her campaign.
Can Hillary tap into these young independents in the general?
If it comes to this, I may need to reveal some...information about how Mr. Kasich has effected my & my family's personal lives. It's not "McCain's Black Baby" level dirt, but I think it might be enough to knock him out of the general.
I understand what they do, but this was the first time I've quoted Nate Silver specifically.
Basically what is going to happen is that a lot could be up in the air next week.
Wait, really? Do you have a source on this?
If it comes to this, I may need to reveal some...information about how Mr. Kasich has effected my personal life. It's not "McCain's Black Baby" level dirt, but I think it might be enough to knock him out of the general.
I'm well aware. Read what I wrote again.The percentage refers to the total precincts, not vote total.
My point is that is wasn't just luck that made Nate wrong.
It's one thing to aggregate polls, but it's another to make predictions about primary elections. You can't just rely on the poll numbers (there is other data out there), and I expect that Nate will be forced to learn from this mistake.
CNN just said regardless Hillary is closer to the nomination regardless.
The math doesn't add up for him to have a chance.I doubt it...
Bernie really has a chance now. At least, for now, it seems like it
Uh, I mean, no? Are you suggesting that Decision Desk is risking their reputation to make an inaccurate call when the current vote total leans the other direction...for the lols? Like, you understand that making accurate calls is literally the only reason anybody pays attention to them right?
"Basically what is going to happen is I don't know what is going to happen next week."
That is on hell of a sentence.
CNN just said regardless Hillary is closer to the nomination regardless.
That would be so fucking awful.
Where do they break down the black vote by age? I've seen it posted a few times in this thread that he's doing much better with younger black voters than older black voters, which I find kind of hard to believe.
CNN just said Hillary is closer to the nomination regardless.
Well yeah her lead increase.CNN just said Hillary is closer to the nomination regardless.
Gonna be a good day when we can put the lazy millenial voter meme to rest. I feel that day coming very soon.18-29 turned out equal to 65+, nice.
Bad polls in Michigan do not inherently make polls everywhere unreliable.
You do have a pointThat's totally separate argument. It says more about voters than about Trump. More people know who Snooky is than those who know who's vice president in the US. This election is kind of showing that democracy might not work anymore...
I doubt it...
Bernie really has a chance now. At least, for now, it seems like it
Interesting analysis by Chuck Todd on MSNBC.
Basically, tonight's MI results reveal signs that Hillary falters among demographics for whom Bernie (and Trump) really resonate. So maybe someone like Julian Castro for VP is out and someone more Rust Belt/middle class-minded like Sherrod Brown is in.
Even the polls the Sanders campaign was pointing to (Michigan State) had Clinton with a 5 point lead.
Basically all pollsters got it wrong. A historic upset it looks like.
Fair play to you dude. I tip my hat to your efforts.
I think the narrative around the "terrible BernieBros" (and there are certainly terrible ones) has been a bummer mostly because it's caused people to disregard the amazing organization efforts of the Sanders subreddit. For a group of people who are all volunteering, without much experience in doing elections, I've been in awe of their passion and organization.
No model is perfect. They are right the majority of the time.My point is that it wasn't just luck that made Nate wrong.
It's one thing to aggregate polls, but it's another to make predictions about primary elections. You can't just rely on the poll numbers (there is other data out there), and I expect that Nate will be forced to learn from this mistake.
There's one source that didn't, but I'll be making a thread about it if Bernie wins.
Sit tight.
Yeah, as a Hillary supporter here in Michigan, I was really tempted to do this myself, especially since the polls looked good for her. But while I was contemplating if I should request a Republican ballot, I realized that Trump was probably going to run away with the state regardless so there would have really been no point in voting for him and if I wanted to counter-vote Trump the most likely 2nd place candidate was looking to be Kasich and I couldn't bring myself to vote for him even if it would take down Trump's lead a bit especially since a brokered convention is looking less and less likely anyway.7% of the GOP exit polls were Democrats, so yes it is a valid point. Been said multiple times. Turnout is low due to open primaries and people know Hillary is inevitable by the Delegate math and in truth probably not that excited to go vote for her versus the circus on the GOP side. Bernie has a very enthusiastic crowd though.
If it comes to this, I may need to reveal some...information about how Mr. Kasich has effected my & my family's personal lives. It's not "McCain's Black Baby" level dirt, but I think it might be enough to knock him out of the general.
Basically, the message from tonight is Hillary voters should NOT take anything for granted and crossover or stay home. You want her to win? Go vote, and vote for her, or Bernie is going to start racking up wins.