plagiarize
Banned
God damn it, America.
Ehem. Goddamnit *registered GOP voters*.
God damn it, America.
Idk, these exit polls look pretty decent for Bernie. Maybe not enough to win, but enough to close the gap a bit.
Yes. And Boston Mayor Marty Walsh was entering polling locations as well. So, the question then becomes does Bill Clinton's mere presence in a polling location constitute as campaign materials? Clinton was thanking poll workers, and not approaching voters inside the polls.
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2016/03/01/bill-clinton-massachusetts-voting-laws/
From that article - "Inside the polling location, Clinton purchased a cup of coffee from a bake sale and shook hands with poll workers. When another woman asked for a photo, he said, As long as were not violating any election laws.
The campaign is cognizant of election laws.
So, I mean, I think this is yet another fake Clinton scandal, but I will say that saying "only if it's legal" before you do something is not, technically, a legal defense if the thing you're doing turns out not to be legal. You are supposed to not do the thing until you know whether it's legal or not.
So, I mean, I think this is yet another fake Clinton scandal, but I will say that saying "only if it's legal" before you do something is not, technically, a legal defense if the thing you're doing turns out not to be legal. You are supposed to not do the thing until you know whether it's legal or not.
1. Bill X reduces consumer protection for the financially vulnerable.This logic doesn't follow.
Excluding super delegates there is no chance in hell the gap doesn't significantly widen tonight
No I mean the popular vote in individual states. The exits from MA looks pretty great for Bernie. Enough to close the gap and maybe even win.
Also says: "Access to the polling place must be open and unobstructed and the voters may not be hindered."
Nothing will happen because it's a primary, but it's still pretty disgusting behaviour
1. Bill X reduces consumer protection for the financially vulnerable.
2. Politician A supports Bill X.
3. Politician A is aligned with Politician B.
4. Politician B is likely to support Bill X.
5. Politician B supports reducing protection for the financially vulnerable.
4 is the iffiest, but given Clinton's past views on banking, is likely to hold true in my view. She'll superficially fight it though. Or recast it as respecting States' independence.
I feel like even if he tried "a little harder" you'd still be here saying he "could have tried harder." What a subjective measurement. It's clearly a strategic decision on his campaigns part. If he gets these states where it's close, they'd rather have the narrative of winning a state versus fighting for a few percentage points in already-lost states.
Sure. I mean, the question needs to take into account your personal judgment of Bernie Sanders's thought process and his goals.
My assessment has always been that Sanders ran originally to change the race, then decided he actually had a chance at winning. I believe he's smart enough to read a poll sheet and that if he decides he doesn't have a chance to win, he will drop out in order to help the Democratic candidate win.
If you have different priors about Bernie (or, I guess, about the state of the race if Bernie loses every state except Vermont today), then you'll probably come to different conclusions. Which is only reasonable.
However, I don't think "Bernie never lies and always says exactly what he means" is a particularly sensible prior to have, so if somebody is trying to analyze the issue based on that, I'm going to be pretty skeptical of their reasoning.
The amount of Bernie hate in this thread scares me.
No I mean the popular vote in individual states. The exits from MA looks pretty great for Bernie. Enough to close the gap and maybe even win.
When exactly would Sanders be expected to endorse Hillary? Would that be before, during, or after the convention?
Any word on what the Trump press conference is for? I'm guessing an endorsement of some sort, timed to take any wind out of the sails of Cruz and Rubio.
Oh, and this from earlier, lol...
![]()
When exactly would Sanders be expected to endorse Hillary? Would that be before, during, or after the convention?
Within the week he drops out or if he doesn't drop, immediately at the convention.When exactly would Sanders be expected to endorse Hillary? Would that be before, during, or after the convention?
Why would he dump money into states where he isn't likely to win? I'm not sure why you guys think you are campaign-running experts. He is clearly doing much better than anyone expected.
When exactly would Sanders be expected to endorse Hillary? Would that be before, during, or after the convention?
not sure how that tests works, but how can someone agree with sanders, clinton, cruz and rubio on immigration? you would think there would be some major differences there.
When exactly would Sanders be expected to endorse Hillary? Would that be before, during, or after the convention?
It doesn't mean a 100% match on that topic, but I think some of the questions were "Should muslims be allowed in the country" so might have matched that
You're condemning Clinton because someone who wants her to win has taken a position you don't like, as if it follows that Clinton must also have the same position. But it doesn't follow.
ABC News Politics ‏@ABCPolitics 2m2 minutes ago
At least 7 in 10 Democratic #SuperTuesday voters want a nominee with experience rather than an outsider: http://abcn.ws/24zGJGN
I wonder if Rubio (and Cruz for that matter) realize they have no chance or if they're deluded enough to think it's still a fight?
hoo baby
hoo baby
hoo baby
Both Democratic nominees have experience.
Both Democratic nominees have experience.
I wonder if Rubio (and Cruz for that matter) realize they have no chance or if they're deluded enough to think it's still a fight?
Both Democratic nominees have experience.
Yeah I'm starting to think Bernie might only win Vermont tonight
hoo baby