BREAKING NEWS
![]()
Twitter users goes back in time and scrubs away racism from America's history.
A big win there for Hillary. Was she even expected to take that state?
Wow, you should really just watch CNN. He's not pandering to racists, all of the racists are liberals. Open a history book.And so? That was a long time ago and the Democratic Party is different now. Dwight Eisenhower didn't like the military industrial complex but the GOP is full of warmongers now. Times change, simple as that.
And Trump may not be racist but him pandering to racists is just as bad as being racist. He does no good by emboldening hate speech.
look at the margins of victory in some of the southern states. she's winning bigger than Obama did in '08. these delegates are awarded proportionately. not good for le bern
A big win there for Hillary. Was she even expected to take that state?
To be fair to Bernie supporters, a good amount of them have never followed a Democratic primary before so you can't get too upset with them not understanding how proportional delegates work. The fact that they're so closely following MA to see if Bernie can squeak out a 0.1% win when they lost Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, Virginia etc. by 25-40 points says it all.
I admire their blind enthusiasm.
To be fair to Bernie supporters, a good amount of them have never followed a Democratic primary before so you can't get too upset with them not understanding how proportional delegates work. The fact that they're so closely following MA to see if Bernie can squeak out a 0.1% win when they lost Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, Virginia etc. by 25-40 points says it all.
I admire their blind enthusiasm.
In June 2015, Lord wrote an open letter to Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the head of the U.S. Democratic Party, asking her to apologize for her party's role in Indian removal, promoting and defending slavery, Confederate secession, and creating segregationist Jim Crow regimes, saying that the Democrats' historical support for such institutions contributed and contributes to the continuing existence of racism and bigotry in American society.
Fakest smile I've ever seen.
![]()
Terryology will save himObama actually built up his delegate lead in a streak of wins after Super Tuesday. It wasn't this large from memory.
But yes, maths is not Sanders friend.
I didn't know the KKK still matter
Is this a thing spread by Clinton supporters?
I mean if you think about it, even for a second, it wouldn't make any sense. It would be more likely that Bernie supporters would be "disillusioned" and not vote.
Terryology will save him
Drag Poli-GAF.
Doooo iiiiit
Obama actually built up his delegate lead in a streak of wins after Super Tuesday. It wasn't this large from memory.
But yes, maths is not Sanders friend.
This woman on MSNBC quit her Vice Chair job at the DNC just so she could endorse Sanders?
![]()
In her defense she just didn't want to work for the DNC chair and I am not sure I can blame her.This woman on MSNBC quit her Vice Chair job at the DNC just so she could endorse Sanders?
![]()
This woman on MSNBC quit her Vice Chair job at the DNC just so she could endorse Sanders?
![]()
This line of thinking is ridiculous. The only reason you're under the misunderstanding that TRump is "the most sane," is because he hasn't outlined any policy ever, and the things that he says are not only patently insane for a president of the United States, but they are blatantly unconstitutional.
You can't ban specific religions from entering the country
You can't force Apple to make the iPhone in the United States
You can't force a foreign country to pay for a domestic policy
You think Trump is "the most sane" because he hasn't outlined any policy and nobody is forcing him to. But if his quotes are any indication of his policy (Which at this point they may not be because he contradicts himself almost every day), his policy is blatantly insane and unconstitutional for a President.
When Trump says "President" he thinks "King," but they're not the same thing.
Is this a thing spread by Clinton supporters?
I mean if you think about it, even for a second, it wouldn't make any sense. It would be more likely that Bernie supporters would be "disillusioned" and not vote.
only one man can save us
![]()
Brehs did they kick Van Jones off the panel or did he leave of his own accord?
I see he tried to use those cheap teeth whiteners. Fucked his shit all up.
That's would be really bad for any grassroots candidates. The main parties would probably love it.Would you be in favor of having every primary held on the same day? What would change?
Brehs did they kick Van Jones off the panel or did he leave of his own accord?
A big win there for Hillary. Was she even expected to take that state?
No, this is thing that's actually been said in threads previously. The idea is that Bernie and Trump are both anti-establishment, so in the case of Bernie's loss, Trump is the better option.
Does make much sense, but it's been said. I take it as a vocal fringe and not indicative of Sanders supporters.
They have been switching people in and out.
Brehs did they kick Van Jones off the panel or did he leave of his own accord?
Can we get Frank Underwood instead?
Gotcha. Should have switched out douche lord.
And over the next couple of weeks she'll blow those numbers out even more. Being down by something like 100 delegates at this point is bad, but not insurmountable. Make it 200 like it is now and things become a *lot* harder. Over the next 2 weeks, an additional 854 delegates are up for grabs. I assume Bernie will win a majority of the 25 up for grabs in Maine, but assuming that Hillary gets 55 percent of the rest (*very* generous considering the huge margins she has in a lot of those states), he's down nearly 100 more. Add in the superdelegates, and she's up by nearly 800 delegates. That's an insurmountable lead.
The only large states (>100 delegates) left after that are Washington (101, probably leans Bernie), New York (247, almost certainly leans Hillary), Pennsylvania (189, no clue who would be ahead there), California (475, would lean Bernie but the large Hispanic population would lean Hillary keeping things fairly close), and New Jersey (126, probably leans Hillary). None of these are likely to be outright blowouts one way or the other, so assuming those delegates are fairly evenly split, there's just not enough to make up the difference.
That's a delegate deathblow to Sanders.
Obama in 2008 didn't even have that kind of lead right after Super Tuesday.
Bernie is now 200+ delegates behind without supers. Mathematically Bernie has no realistic path to the nomination now.
It makes 2008 diehard Hillary supporters seem downright rational and sane by comparison and they were in mathematical losing battle. This is so far beyond that, I don't understand how someone can rationally argue he has a path to the nomination.