Super Tuesday 2016 |OT| The Final Incursion is a double Incursion (Mar 5-15 contests)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any chance that Hillary nominates Bernie for VP?

Not much and she shouldn't IMO

Politically, she doesn't gain much in terms of votes from having him on the ticket. His base is solidly Democrat who were probably going to already vote for her anyway (even the stragglers will come around eventually by November). He doesn't offer that much crossover appeal with Indies or RINOs

In terms of policy, having his liberal voice in the Senate is much more important long term than having it be second chair in the White House.
 
Not quite zero, but pretty close. She wouldn't gain much by doing it, honestly

If Bernie truly split the votes (likely not) or threatened to run third party (he's not) then I could see a VP nom but I think Hillary would nominate a fresh liberal darling/a minority candidate to lock up those votes.

Donald Trump will probably nominate someone straight out of Clown College.
 
Any chance that Hillary nominates Bernie for VP?

0, zero, ziltch

a) Bernie is not a Democrat and has minimal party loyalty
b) Bernie is OLDER than she is.
c) the party wants a young rising star and shape him with enough Star Power to be the face of the future

Democrats need a youthful make over. a Younger VEEP is inevitable
 
I'm too lazy to go vote for Bernie in Temnessee. Even tho my location is literally down the steet at a church. I don't want to leave the house.
 
I'm not sure who she'd nominate to VP. It likely won't be O'Malley since Dems have had Maryland locked down for a very long time and there isn't anyone else who really stands out to me.
 
Any chance that Hillary nominates Bernie for VP?

If I was her, I wouldn't. There are other young and exciting VP candidates out there. Obama didn't choose Clinton, Romney didn't choose Santorum, McCain didn't choose Romney, Bush didn't choose McCain and Gore didn't choose Bradley etc. Clinton will want someone who can work with her.
 
I'm too lazy to go vote for Bernie in Temnessee. Even tho my location is literally down the steet at a church. I don't want to leave the house.
Go vote. I say that as a Clinton supporter. Young people will only start seeing politicians give a fuck about them and which way they want the country to go if they get out and vote. Reliably.
 
I'm too lazy to go vote for Bernie in Temnessee. Even tho my location is literally down the steet at a church. I don't want to leave the house.

The fuck is wrong with you, man? Go vote. I just did. It was a three minute drive, the line was like 10 people long, whole thing took less than 20 minutes from the time I put my pants on until I took my pants off.
 
Goddamn! The American electoral system is so fucking confusing! How can the average American keep tabs on all these rules that change state by state? My guess is they don't.
What's the point of "keeping tabs" on each specific state? Candidates either win or lose a state, by a certain percentage of points, and that's all that really matters when it comes to results. It's also healthy to have a general idea of how the delegate system works in primaries.
 
I'm too lazy to go vote for Bernie in Temnessee. Even tho my location is literally down the steet at a church. I don't want to leave the house.

Go vote. At the very least your vote cancles out some crazy racist shitbag that thinks Armageddon is right around the corner.

Perform an epic block.
 
How likely is Warren as a VR pick?

More likely than Bernie, but also unlikely. Ideally, they want a male and younger than Clinton.

People like Warren and Sanders can do more outside of the VP position, honestly.
 
There has to be a contrast. If you are old you need someone young. If you are young you need someone older. Hillary needs someone younger. It's looking like it will be Castro unless there is a surprise.
 
Your comments come off as pretty contradictory:

Argument 1: She is only pandering to skin color and not pro-diversity policies.
Argument 2: Her pro-diversity action of taking down the Confederate flag is going to hurt her.
Argument 3: She's a total phony.

I don't see how they possibly contradict.

Haley is pandering, and her decision to take down the Confederate flag was pandering in the wake of tragedy (and was read as such by many of her voters if you read through the reaction at the time).

But even though she thinks that taking down the Confederate flag gives her some "not a racist" bonafides, she still supports GOP policies that enshrine racism. Her decision about the flag also comes off as less-than-noble when you consider how she is at the forefront of a push to show that the face of the GOP isn't necessarily old white dudes (which leads to cringeworthy stuff like the "Benetton ad" comment).

None of that contradicts at all. I'm baffled by the thought that it does.
 
nUPPWgL.png
 
0, zero, ziltch

a) Bernie is not a Democrat and has minimal party loyalty
b) Bernie is OLDER than she is.
c) the party wants a young rising star and shape him with enough Star Power to be the face of the future

Democrats need a youthful make over. a Younger VEEP is inevitable
Julian Castro?

He's from Texas. Doubt it would turn it into a blue state, but it would get a lot of those latino voters.
 
You don't pick an older VP than yourselves.
Young Presidential Candidates pick Old VEEPs Obama-Biden, JFK-LBJ
Old Presidential Candidates pick Young VEEPs McCain-Palin, Bush-Quayle,

the closest young Presidential Candidate who picked an almost as young VEEP was Clinton-Gore
Julian Castro?

He's from Texas. Doubt it would turn it into a blue state, but it would get a lot of those latino voters.
Castro has been getting a similar level of Grooming as Obama has gotten in 2004's Keynote address building up to 2008.
 
Yes, but momentum requires a narrative. The narrative of a path to victory becomes weak if he gets sweeped today.

I never argued otherwise (nor did the poster you originally responded to).

We were having a completely different discussion.

You keep mentioning "viable candidate" and say you want Bernie to keep going til the last state, yet we will know he can't win before because there will come a point where the delegates left won't be enough to get him the nomination. How then will he a viable candidate and why waste people money and time to keep going to the last state

Viability varies from state to state and has nothing to do with winning the overall nomination.

My point is that he's running on the principle of representing the respective people of every state, regardless if that results in a win or not.

You may not like it, but the DNC Primary process allows this to happen. They could just select the nominee once it's clear who that person will be, but they don't. He's within his right to take advantage of that (and so is Hillary).
 
She's not going to pick Warren, even if Warren were open to it (and who, mercifully, is not).

You're more likely to see someone like Terry McAuliffe than a Warren.

Not that it matters. VP picks are basically a one-off press release, and short of picking a Palin, it won't really factor into most anyone's decision. Besides, she's already got a VP and he's been riding shotgun the whole time.
 
I never argued otherwise (nor did the poster you originally responded to).

We were having a completely different discussion.
.

Wasn't arguing! Just commenting. :P

She's not going to pick Warren, even if Warren were open to it (and who, mercifully, is not).

You're more likely to see someone like Terry McAuliffe than a Warren.

Not that it matters. VP picks are basically a one-off press release, and short of picking a Palin, it won't really factor into most anyone's decision. Besides, she's already got a VP and he's been riding shotgun the whole time.

Warren is playing some weird kind of long game by holding off her endorsement to either candidate.
Either that or something weird going on behind the scenes.

Vote. Get in the habit of voting.
It's better for democracy when more people vote

Yes! Voting for the losing candidate or even voting no preference is better than not voting. The larger of a base politicians have to cater to, the less extreme they can be.
 
Julian Castro?

He's from Texas. Doubt it would turn it into a blue state, but it would get a lot of those latino voters.

I think the logic is that he is younger and the Dems can use him to play the long game with the southern red States with growing Hispanic populations. Turn some of the red into purple or even blue in the next decade. All according to keikaku.

Plus it would alleviate some of Hillary's disconnect with younger voters. He'll have an easier time pretending to be hip compared to her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom