Yeah, but only because *I* started it. And we all know what I think of this situation.firex said:KONEX BEARS
It worked for the mets!
FrenchMovieTheme said:colts!
whytemyke said:as much as I want the people screaming about how bad the NFC is to shut up, I WILL say that I think the Colts will win. And I'm pulling for Peyton (and sprint, gatorade, directtv, etc) as well.
Agent Icebeezy said:As a Lions fan living in Chicagoland, I can't have this shit going on, Manning must stop this shit.
Eggo said:It's amazing that everyone picks against the Bears, even in the Super Bowl. According to the radio, Vegas already had the Colts -7. Unbelievable... the Bears have the better offense and defense than the Colts, and defense wins championships, and we're still major underdogs. F the haters.
...And this 'black coach' thing has got to stop. We do not need 2 weeks of reading that story. Write the Dungy/Smith buddy story. Write about Tank's second chance. Write about The Tale of Two Grossmans... or Benson's emergence. Anderson or Hester's breakout years. So many other stories that are more compelling than a person's skin color.
you're a lions fan?! where have you been all season? I thought I was the lone Lions fan on here (well PDark is one, too, but he doesnt really seem to give a shit outside of when the game is on tv).Agent Icebeezy said:As a Lions fan living in Chicagoland, I can't have this shit going on, Manning must stop this shit.
coldvein said:no matter who wins the superbowl it'll be a real feel good affair, cause either way a BLACK COACH will win! yes!!!
Wait until the ESPN "experts" make their pick. Then pick whoever DIDN'T get picked by a majority of their experts. Want proof? 100% of their guys picked the Saints. 100%. Look what happened.Wes said:Recommend to a UK Gaffer who he should be placing his money on for this game. Bare in mind I have no understanding of the deep technical aspects of the game so this will mean nothing to me. I'm thinking Colts at the moment. Mainly because that's a more imaginative name for a team than Bears.
Wes said:Recommend to a UK Gaffer who he should be placing his money on for this game. Bare in mind I have no understanding of the deep technical aspects of the game so this will mean nothing to me. I'm thinking Colts at the moment. Mainly because that's a more imaginative name for a team than Bears.
Kenobi said:Well, me being a Bears fan myself...realistically and the smartest way to go would be Colts. HOWEVER, there was a time when the Bills were favorite against the Giants, and when Tyson was a favorite against Douglas. Sooooo yeah...Risk is part of the game.
Agent Icebeezy said:Tyson knocked out Douglas in the 8th round. Douglas was down for 15 seconds. Not related to this thread, but I do enjoy pointing that out
FrenchMovieTheme said:colts!
couldnt say it better myselfKenobi said:I think its fitting that the two teams in the beginning of the NFL season were undefeated are now facing each other in the Superbowl. It's not that "whoever wins, a black coach wins." or "whoever wins, we win because the Pats are out." Ladies and Gentelmen, it should be "Who ever wins, WE win, because we are getting one hell of a game."
The NFC is the AFC's bitch... unless it's the top offensive team from the AFC going up against the top defensive team in the NFC. Like what happened when TB drew Oaktown in SB XXXVII.VALIS said:The NFC is still the AFC's bitch until I see otherwise, which is why the Colts win by 10, 31-21.
And after the game the media holds a ceremony to anoint Peyton Manning as Media God and promise to write and talk about him every single day for thousands of centuries until the sun in our solar system finally burns out.![]()
Don't worry, Bubba. We've got God and Rex Grossman on our side; no amount of devil hoodoo horseshit that Manning can pull out of his ass will be able to stop that dynamic duo.chase said:I hate the Colts. If they all get injured it will be too good for them.
PhoenixDark said:Ten FGs seens plausable
buhmachine said:I'm pulling for the Bears, but Grossman is such a crappy quarterback. But then, Manning is such a crappy person in general, so here's hoping Urlacher takes his damn head off.
If New England had won instead of Indianapolis, then I'd say Chicago's victory was surefire. Get in Brady's face and he freaks; I don't think he has much of a threshold for pain. But the Colts' offense can beat just about any defense, and since Chicago's offense basically sucks ass, the Colts will win.
Colts - 24, Bears - 17
buhmachine said:I'm pulling for the Bears, but Grossman is such a crappy quarterback. But then, Manning is such a crappy person in general, so here's hoping Urlacher takes his damn head off.
bionic77 said:And honestly for people that compare Grossman to Dilfer and B. Johnson that is being very unfair to those two quarterbacks. Neither of those guys is a superstar qb, but they don't throw the kind of WTF kind of passes Grossman does all the time. If the Colts pussy defense can stop the Bears formidable rushing attack, it will be interesting to see how he holds up. And it will be even more interesting to see the reception he gets back home if he blows it.
Pretty much. Keep in mind, the Pats didn't have a credible deep threat. Neither did the Ravens or Chiefs, which pretty much allowed the Colts to cram 8 dudes in the box and stop the run. Can't do that against the Bears- Rexstacy will go deep and long on you all night long if you do, baby. Plus, the mere sight of a Sexy Rexy deep bomb connecting with Berrian will probably demoralize Peyton to the point where he just kind of sits there and cries.Outdoor Miner said:Guess what? The Saints at one point completely stuffed the Bears running game on consecutive series and all the momentum had gone the Saints way. It came down to Grossman needing to make plays and he did. The rest his history.
6/6 80 yds 1 td 0 int's in the 2nd half
A similar performance against the Colts will be more than enough for a Bears victory.
Outdoor Miner said:The Saints at one point completely stuffed the Bears running game on consecutive series and all the momentum had gone the Saints way. It came down to Grossman needing to make plays and he did. The rest is history.
6/6 80 yds 1 td 0 int's in the 2nd half
A similar performance against the Colts will be more than enough for a Bears victory.
Oh please. I understand why people hate Brady a lot of the time, but when people say he's "soft" and he's a "pretty boy," it's just ridiculous. The guy takes huge hits and always gets right back up - he's never 100%, but he's never missed a start.buhmachine said:If New England had won instead of Indianapolis, then I'd say Chicago's victory was surefire. Get in Brady's face and he freaks; I don't think he has much of a threshold for pain.
Big Zep said:Because he never takes full responsibility for losses...He always finds a way to throw his teamates under the bus. I hope Chicago ****in destroys them.
woodchuck said:i do not want to see rex grossman win a ring
Rexstacy is harmless. Dumb and lovable. Nothing like that fetusheaded unbearable suck mutant, Peyton Manning. Now there's someone that should never be associated with the word "champion".LiveWire said:QFMFT. I've just become the biggest Colts fan on the planet. Grossman getting a ring is like Sauron getting his hands back on the One Ring.![]()
LiveWire said:Speaking of Manning, $20 says there's a commercial within the next two weeks (or during the Superbowl itself) poking fun at him finally making a Superbowl--maybe even starring Manning himself!