Chie Satonaka
Member
Nope.
One has to have shame in order to feel it, after all.
Nope.
❤️people yapping about "violence gets you nowhere" won't put their own lives on the line for black/brown bodies when it comes to protesting state/white violence. You don't have skin in the game so of course it's easy to say violence isn't the answer.
and if you have the receipts to prove me wrong, I encourage you to.
No problem. By the way, I see another similarity with the alt right strategy in Scrooged. The second he was called out with receipts, he disappeared
Man, that's not what's being said at all. And something tells me you don't really believe people en mass should resort to violence right now. I mean, have you ever participated in deliberately violent protest if you supposedly feel so strongly about it's necessity?
And? Again, that doesn't refute the original claim! And protests don't have to be violent in order to be disruptive!
people yapping about "violence gets you nowhere" won't put their own lives on the line for black/brown bodies when it comes to protesting state/white violence. You don't have skin in the game so of course it's easy to say violence isn't the answer.
and if you have the receipts to prove me wrong, I encourage you to.
The US has proven time and time again, domestically and internationally, that violence is the answer.
Or is state violence the only violence people are ok with?
That said, I want what most people want: peaceful resolution with a threat of violence for those who refuse to let their racism go. Neos, Klan, whoever.
Being a minority doesn't instantly make your situation bad. Usually it's that compounded with poverty.
There's a difference between advocating for nonviolence and saying violence is never necessary. On gaf in particular though, the second you start saying things didn't need to turn violent in a specific instance, you get labeled a white supremacist or some such nonsense. Now, maybe violence was necessary here, maybe it wasn't, but we should at least be able to have that conversation without labeling everyone who happens to disagree with you something nasty. The implicit message being pushed is that violence is always ok if the perpetrators happen to be on your side. Both sides are NOT the same but both sides definitely use that flawed logic to give themselves a pass while condemning everyone who shows even the slightest hint of questioning.I'm not arguing for everyone to go out and do what Antifa does, I'm saying they are a piece of the left that non violent folks shouldn't be shitting on from the safety of their homes, especially white folks (not saying you are white, just from what I see on Twitter, etc). I'm out here putting in work, I wasn't in Berkeley yesterday because I was here in Sacramento marching. I think from my posts here you can deduce what I'm about and what I do.
The people who wouldn't shut up about Obama FEMA camp conspiracies and false flag shootings to get guns banned are the same ones howling for martial law on inner cities and hoping for civil war so they can burn down liberal states and cities.Or is state violence the only violence people are ok with?
There's a difference between advocating for nonviolence and saying violence is never necessary. On gaf in particular though, the second you start saying things didn't need to turn violent in a specific instance, you get labeled a white supremacist or some such nonsense. Now, maybe violence was necessary here, maybe it wasn't, but we should at least be able to have that conversation without labeling everyone who happens to disagree with you something nasty. The implicit message being pushed is that violence is always ok if the perpetrators happen to be on your side. Both sides are NOT the same but both sides definitely use that flawed logic to give themselves a pass while condemning everyone who shows even the slightest hint of questioning.
The US has proven time and time again, domestically and internationally, that violence is the answer.
Or is state violence the only violence people are ok with?
That said, I want what most people want: peaceful resolution with a threat of violence for those who refuse to let their racism go. Neos, Klan, whoever.
No problem. By the way, I see another similarity with the alt right strategy in Scrooged. The second he was called out with receipts, he disappeared
Please, you practically went down the alt-right checklist in order to support your nonsense.
+ I watched the entire thing and it was the Antifa antagonizers who started this!
+ "Actually it's not about white supremacy, it's about free speech in politics..." (Flashback "It's about ethics in videogame journalism.")
+ Both sides are the same, extreme left and extreme right! Herpity Derpity!
+ They're just trying to have an open space to discuss their white genocidal political views (oh wait we're supposed to pretend it's not white genocide)
+ Oh yeah, well you're just in a bubble! (Surprised you just didn't say I should start reading Breitbart instead of #FakeNews like CNN and PBS)
I can go on and on.
You do the same shit they do to try to obfuscate your actual agenda. You pretend you dislike both sides, and yet you apparently were interested enough to watch this entire rally - which clearly you don't support, CLEARLY - to identify all the Antifa people throwing M80s into the crowd.
You deny the fact that for a full month these alt right douchebags were using this fake "free speech" cover to get revenge on what happened to Milo's speech months ago, intentionally advocating that people dress up as Antifa Black Bloc to try to pretend they were inciting shit:
I can show you entire threads from the dark side of the internet where these people gathered, planned and executed this shit, and are now celebrating the same thing.
And you're coming in here with the gall to act all indignant that people don't see through your transparent bullshit?
I think you really missed the point Kid was making. We were being asked to reconcile our ideals about non-violence with the knowledge our state has always used it to oppress us and conquer the world.This depresses me. GREATLY.
Violence sometimes works, but elevating your POV to a position justifying a violent act will cut away people who agree with you and entrench those marginally agreeing with the opposing viewpoint. Even if you win, violence keeps people angry for generations.
Personally, I look at the racism in this country and believe us liberals should continue to take the high road. Iteratively change the culture as liberals have through the arts, sciences, and education. To cut it out with purity tests in these areas and broaden our allies. So to not be discouraged when non-violent approaches take a step back like they have recently.
Get over yourself. I don't live on this forum.
You're just so cemented on your side that you can't see when someone has logical moderate opinion. You are so quick to label people as Nazis that it has clouded your judgement. Just repeating what I have said back at me is somehow an argument. Yes, I watched most of the entire event and yes, what I saw was Antifa doing their usual thing of causing chaos. How is his even controversial? It's their MO for crying out loud!
What you need to realize is that everyone who showed up at the rally/event are not a monolith. There were people from the left *gasp* that showed up too. There were people who supported Trump. There were people who only support free speech. One of the speakers outright called out the White Nationalists that showed up and said that they don't represent everyone there.
Also, who the hell are you to say what I'm truly interested in? I watched because I wanted to get a first hand experience of the event, knowing what happened at previous events. Let me make this clear to you: I AM NOT A TRUMP SUPPORTER. I AM NOT A WHITE NATIONALIST.
Get off your fucking high horse.
Okay, and if there is evidence that these people were intending to outright assault the other side instead of pure self defense then guess what? They are assholes who I don't support either. My god how crazy, right?
How can you not see that the Antifa organization is the same exact fucking thing? They called people to "shut it down".
But no, it's easier to throw a blanket over every single person at the rally so that you have an excuse to "punch a Nazi". You're encouraging dangerous fucking behavior.
Get over yourself. I don't live on this forum.
You're just so cemented on your side that you can't see when someone has logical moderate opinion. You are so quick to label people as Nazis that it has clouded your judgement. Just repeating what I have said back at me is somehow an argument. Yes, I watched most of the entire event and yes, what I saw was Antifa doing their usual thing of causing chaos. How is his even controversial? It's their MO for crying out loud!
What you need to realize is that everyone who showed up at the rally/event are not a monolith. There were people from the left *gasp* that showed up too. There were people who supported Trump. There were people who only support free speech. One of the speakers outright called out the White Nationalists that showed up and said that they don't represent everyone there.
Also, who the hell are you to say what I'm truly interested in? I watched because I wanted to get a first hand experience of the event, knowing what happened at previous events. Let me make this clear to you: I AM NOT A TRUMP SUPPORTER. I AM NOT A WHITE NATIONALIST.
Get off your fucking high horse.
Okay, and if there is evidence that these people were intending to outright assault the other side instead of pure self defense then guess what? They are assholes who I don't support either. My god how crazy, right?
How can you not see that the Antifa organization is the same exact fucking thing? They called people to "shut it down".
But no, it's easier to throw a blanket over every single person at the rally so that you have an excuse to "punch a Nazi". You're encouraging dangerous fucking behavior.
Spot on. Rationalizing our beliefs even when we're directly contradicting them while we explain is a hell of a drug.I wonder if you realize that you're walking, talking, living proof that talking things out isn't enough for what needs to be accomplished. When getting through to a supposed moderate on issues that don't actually have any middleground is like lifting Mjonir, what hope is there to get convince the direct opposition?
I've seen people in threads like this who've basically admitted they would rather die a cowards death than ever think of inflicting harm on another person no matter how dire the situation. These people won't even protect themselves or their families if it came down to it.
Get over yourself. I don't live on this forum.
You're just so cemented on your side that you can't see when someone has logical moderate opinion. You are so quick to label people as Nazis that it has clouded your judgement. Just repeating what I have said back at me is somehow an argument. Yes, I watched most of the entire event and yes, what I saw was Antifa doing their usual thing of causing chaos. How is his even controversial? It's their MO for crying out loud!
What you need to realize is that everyone who showed up at the rally/event are not a monolith. There were people from the left *gasp* that showed up too. There were people who supported Trump. There were people who only support free speech. One of the speakers outright called out the White Nationalists that showed up and said that they don't represent everyone there.
Also, who the hell are you to say what I'm truly interested in? I watched because I wanted to get a first hand experience of the event, knowing what happened at previous events. Let me make this clear to you: I AM NOT A TRUMP SUPPORTER. I AM NOT A WHITE NATIONALIST.
Okay, and if there is evidence that these people were intending to outright assault the other side instead of pure self defense then guess what? They are assholes who I don't support either. My god how crazy, right?
But no, it's easier to throw a blanket over every single person at the rally so that you have an excuse to "punch a Nazi". You're encouraging dangerous fucking behavior.
Scrooged: I mean, in this internet age /pol/ and friends is just one click away - you can be the emissary to the alt-right and teach them about how people of color are human beings and that ethnic cleanses are wrong even if you use the word "peaceful" to describe them.
You seem really invested in this, enough to watch livestreams of the protests against nazis. So why not put your own philosophy into action?
This depresses me. GREATLY.
Violence sometimes works, but elevating your POV to a position justifying a violent act will cut away people who agree with you and entrench those marginally agreeing with the opposing viewpoint. Even if you win, violence keeps people angry for generations.
Personally, I look at the racism in this country and believe us liberals should continue to take the high road. Iteratively change the culture as liberals have through the arts, sciences, and education. To cut it out with purity tests in these areas and broaden our allies. So to not be discouraged when non-violent approaches take a step back like they have recently.
Brenna Lundy, 28, said she drove from San Francisco to attend what she thought was an organizing event against the alt-right. As the violence unfolded, she stayed and attempted to talk to some of the people shouting insults at her.
”So I genuinely wanted to talk. I am trying to talk to you," Lundy said to a woman screaming at her that ”Obama hates blacks."
Another woman from the pro-Trump side came up to Lundy and, putting a hand to her ear, said, ”Ask her why she hates white people."
Lundy looked confused. She gave up and turned away.
”This is more of a riot," she said.
Let them come to South Cali, let's see what happens lol.
It's hard to get more liberal than Berkeley...
I tried posting facts and statistics on r/the_donald once. I was immediately banned. I know I'm not the only person here who's tried it.