-Pyromaniac-
Member
It's pretty easy to understand why there are a lot of nitpicking outside of the obvious flaw of the lack of ecosystem. I mean it's 600 damn bucks for it with a cover. Plus tax. That shit is EXPENSIVE.
I think mentioning the features that Windows RT competitors have, that are lacking on RT is worth mentioning in a review...
It's pretty easy to understand why there are a lot of nitpicking outside of the obvious flaw of the lack of ecosystem. I mean it's 600 damn bucks for it with a cover. Plus tax. That shit is EXPENSIVE.
Cnet found where to download some on the Synaptics site.
I... don't understand. Importing videos from a USB, then importing it into the Video app (a desktop program, apparently?)? What is he talking about?
a few mention it. But I'm saying. It's a premium product. Premium products are subject to a lot more nitpicking. And it's justified.Similar to mentioning other platforms lack USB connectivity to most devices. It's not essential. Not that it's totally not an unfair comparison, but just shows what the reference device the reviewer was basing his review on.
I don't think any review really harped on the price point or even mentioned it.
That is basically my read on it as well. Sounds like a good, not great, first release of hardware and software. There is alot of room to improve, but there is also a great deal of potential. Great for early adopters, but not quite ready for prime time...
It's pretty easy to understand why there are a lot of nitpicking outside of the obvious flaw of the lack of ecosystem. I mean it's 600 damn bucks for it with a cover. Plus tax. That shit is EXPENSIVE.
Main reason why I want a pro, it will be a windows pc in a tablet body and that really interests me a lot.
a few mention it. But I'm saying. It's a premium product. Premium products are subject to a lot more nitpicking. And it's justified.
its windows 8 so probably.Has there been any info on if the Pro will support USB Ethernet? I'm guessing it would since its running full W8. Just curious since I'm planning on replacing my ultrabook with the surface pro. I go on tons of business trips, and the hotels I stay at don't always have WiFi.
I'd love for some reviews to be more aggressive regarding those tablets being a laptop replacement...
Okay, maybe the bundled dock/type cover are not enough for it to actually be a laptop. But the hardware supports 3rd party keyboards, second monitor and whatnot...
I wish they would review those scenarios, citing incompatibilities problems, using remote desktop (both at the same network and at a remote network) etc...
There's a few productivity options already that none of reviews seemed to address... For example, i could rent an server on Ms azure and use it for development, but would it be good? Would the remote desktop client work with touch?
I understand the reviews being just about what comes out of the box, but being easier to connect to other stuff is also a big part of those tablets...
I disagree, but whatever.
Microsoft should have done a better job differentiating the Windows RT and 8
Quoting from a page back because really this. It is probably because all the reviewers have been accustomed to what to expect for limitations from a modern media consumption tablet, but I'm disappointed none of them has really prodded the device into what it can really offer on that front.
Remote desktop? USB connectivity? Monitor support? Network access? C'mon guys.
(disclaimer: I am a Microsoft employee)
After testing a Surface for a while, I agree with some of the reviews, but haven't had nearly as bad an experience with the software. The hardware is awesome, the app store is lacking (but should get built out pretty quickly, especially on Friday at the actual launch), and some things are slow like launching applications and a few games.
However, I've become exceedingly impressed with general performance of just using it. Internet Explorer loads pages faster than any other tablet I've ever used, including the iPad 3. And it effortlessly can load many tabs in the background simultaneously without slowing down the main tab you're looking at. Basically my main workflow is loading up a bunch of tabs from Google Reader or message board threads and reading them later. This works incredibly well on Surface.
The thing is, that performance keeps up even if I'm playing a video in the 1/3 view. I had a 720p video playing in the 1/3 view, streaming over the network from my homegroup, and web browsing was still speedy as can be.
Flash performance too has improved dramatically over the last couple weeks. Whether it's an embed on another site or right on YouTube, I never encountered the major hitches shown in some of the video reviews. It isn't always perfectly smooth though, unfortunately.
I think one of my favorite experiences using Surface was over the weekend. I wanted to put a couple TV show episodes on it to watch while I was away for the weekend. I actually hesitated for a minute - "oh no, how do I get videos on this?"
Quickly, of course, I realized the obvious - it's fucking Windows! I don't need to use USB, or SD, or even use strange video formats (though those are options). All I had to do was load up File Explorer in the Desktop, click HomeGroup, and tap and drag. Actually, I just used the "copy to" section of the Ribbon (which is also a great addition making the Desktop slightly better with touch), and I was done.
It was such a stark, welcome departure from what I was used to with my Kindle Fire or iPod Touch.
Touch Cover works well, even on my lap. Though on my lap I need to tap keys harder to get them to register. I haven't tried Type Cover.
The negatives - Mail app is fucking slow. I'm glad they added threaded messaging finally, but it's just so slow on Surface. It even has some strange formatting errors when typing, where things will temporarily screw up visually, or keyboard entry will get unnaturally slow. Apps also do take longer than I'd like to open, though switching is instant once that happens. And 15+ apps can be suspended for instant resume later.
Some of the games perform great, even more complex 3D games, but others are obviously shoddy ports. Jetpack Joyride is one such example. It's so obviously a scaled-up version of the iPhone game instead of iPad, with pixelated graphics, and even then it barely maintains 20-30fps. Really guys? 20-30FPS on what's mostly a simple 2D game that runs at a perfectly smooth 60FPS on much slower hardware? Sheesh.
Luckily, as some sites have pointed out, software can be updated over time. And with the Store, that's easy to do. The hardware is awesome, and it doesn't need to be fixed
And, of course, the app store. It's pretty empty right now. But the thing is, Apple pointed out something notable at their keynote this morning - they find that people use the web browser more than anything else. This definitely holds true with my use of Surface, and not because of the lack of apps. To me it's simply because the browser is awesome, and it fits my usage style. I like using the Google Reader and Twitter web sites, and they work perfectly in IE on the Surface. Hopefully better apps come soon that improve it further, but I basically replicate on Surface what I do on my Desktop PC, and I don't feel limited at all.
dumb question but is this the RT or PRO?
If this is an iPad competitor it doesn't seem expensive at all.It's pretty easy to understand why there are a lot of nitpicking outside of the obvious flaw of the lack of ecosystem. I mean it's 600 damn bucks for it with a cover. Plus tax. That shit is EXPENSIVE.
It is pretty expensive though. I mean you basically need a cover, that's one of the major selling points. So you're looking at 599 minimum realistically. Yes the 32gb ipad is just as expensive but you know what, it has a MUCH smaller OS footprint and a REALLY REALLY high-res screen.If this is an iPad competitor it doesn't expensive at all.
It is pretty expensive though. I mean you basically need a cover, that's one of the major selling points. So you're looking at 599 minimum realistically. Yes the 32gb ipad is just as expensive but you know what, it has a MUCH smaller OS footprint and a REALLY REALLY high-res screen.
RT surface is definitely VERY expensive. 499 for the tablet plus the cover would have been a very reasonable price point.
Ooooo nice. should be fun to see what applications come. And I still don't believe the lap use, someone needs to make a video of this.the app store is lacking (but should get built out pretty quickly, especially on Friday at the actual launch)
Touch Cover works well, even on my lap. Though on my lap I need to tap keys harder to get them to register. I haven't tried Type Cover.
Whys everything more expensive on the windows store then the equivalents on Android or Ios >.<? Fruit Ninja for an eg!
How much is Fruit Ninja on Windows Store?Whys everything more expensive on the windows store then the equivalents on Android or Ios >.<? Fruit Ninja for an eg!
Minimum pricing for apps is $1.49.
Ok, 4.99 is too much. 2.99 would be the right price for Fruit Ninja.On the AU store, fruity ninja is 4.99, ipad hd version is 2.99.
Sounds like WP7 here as well.On the AU store, fruity ninja is 4.99, ipad hd version is 2.99.
(disclaimer: I am a Microsoft employee)
After testing a Surface for a while, I agree with some of the reviews, but haven't had nearly as bad an experience with the software. The hardware is awesome, the app store is lacking (but should get built out pretty quickly, especially on Friday at the actual launch), and some things are slow like launching applications and a few games.
However, I've become exceedingly impressed with general performance of just using it. Internet Explorer loads pages faster than any other tablet I've ever used, including the iPad 3. And it effortlessly can load many tabs in the background simultaneously without slowing down the main tab you're looking at. Basically my main workflow is loading up a bunch of tabs from Google Reader or message board threads and reading them later. This works incredibly well on Surface.
The thing is, that performance keeps up even if I'm playing a video in the 1/3 view. I had a 720p video playing in the 1/3 view, streaming over the network from my homegroup, and web browsing was still speedy as can be.
Flash performance too has improved dramatically over the last couple weeks. Whether it's an embed on another site or right on YouTube, I never encountered the major hitches shown in some of the video reviews. It isn't always perfectly smooth though, unfortunately.
I think one of my favorite experiences using Surface was over the weekend. I wanted to put a couple TV show episodes on it to watch while I was away for the weekend. I actually hesitated for a minute - "oh no, how do I get videos on this?"
Quickly, of course, I realized the obvious - it's fucking Windows! I don't need to use USB, or SD, or even use strange video formats (though those are options). All I had to do was load up File Explorer in the Desktop, click HomeGroup, and tap and drag. Actually, I just used the "copy to" section of the Ribbon (which is also a great addition making the Desktop slightly better with touch), and I was done.
It was such a stark, welcome departure from what I was used to with my Kindle Fire or iPod Touch.
Touch Cover works well, even on my lap. Though on my lap I need to tap keys harder to get them to register. I haven't tried Type Cover.
The negatives - Mail app is fucking slow. I'm glad they added threaded messaging finally, but it's just so slow on Surface. It even has some strange formatting errors when typing, where things will temporarily screw up visually, or keyboard entry will get unnaturally slow. Apps also do take longer than I'd like to open, though switching is instant once that happens. And 15+ apps can be suspended for instant resume later.
Some of the games perform great, even more complex 3D games, but others are obviously shoddy ports. Jetpack Joyride is one such example. It's so obviously a scaled-up version of the iPhone game instead of iPad, with pixelated graphics, and even then it barely maintains 20-30fps. Really guys? 20-30FPS on what's mostly a simple 2D game that runs at a perfectly smooth 60FPS on much slower hardware? Sheesh.
Luckily, as some sites have pointed out, software can be updated over time. And with the Store, that's easy to do. The hardware is awesome, and it doesn't need to be fixed
And, of course, the app store. It's pretty empty right now. But the thing is, Apple pointed out something notable at their keynote this morning - they find that people use the web browser more than anything else. This definitely holds true with my use of Surface, and not because of the lack of apps. To me it's simply because the browser is awesome, and it fits my usage style. I like using the Google Reader and Twitter web sites, and they work perfectly in IE on the Surface. Hopefully better apps come soon that improve it further, but I basically replicate on Surface what I do on my Desktop PC, and I don't feel limited at all.
Remote desktop client works, but it can't act as a host. There's even a touch version of Remote Desktop in the Store, and it supports RemoteApp so you can actually appear to run full Desktop applications on Surface as long as you're on a corporate network with those apps hosted
USB connectivity is great for the most part. Anything with an in-box generic driver works (some printers, most mobile broadband, mice, keyboards, expandable storage, Xbox 360 controllers, and more)
One other thing that none of the reviews mention that I think could be huge for many families is native, robust multi-user support. It works elegantly and easily, setting up kids accounts, having different apps on each account, restricting access to accounts, etc. Every app downloaded from the store is available to every account on that machine, so you don't need to re-buy apps or games for multiple accounts. Switching is instant on Surface, things don't get bogged down.
iOS is at something like 400+ million since 2007. Vista was considered a failure, it sold something like 200 million. Windows 8 will sell, which means support for the new Windows UI which means support for Windows RT. I wouldn't worry about app support.Basically sounds like WP7. A lot of potential.
They need to get the software out there. That killed the phone for me. 2 years later and no TV Guide app?
Sounds like WP7 here as well.
there will probably be about 10k at launch, at least worldwide.unlike windows phone 7, windows 8 will have a ridiculous amount of (somewhat buggy) apps out within a month after it comes out. i'm betting 10k within the first few weeks.
yeah most of the stuff I will do is browse the web, but I still don't want to give up that support for desktop applications, so I am not willing to get a Windows RT machine. I want a "no compromise" tablet as Microsoft would say.Re-reading what I wrote, I realize I basically said that Surface is an awesome device for browsing the web. heh. Because no matter what tablet/device I have, that's basically all I do with it - whether Kindle Fire, iPad, or iPod Touch. Outside of a few games here and there.
Which works great for me! The extra productivity it allows is a nice bonus.
Gotta get my hands on a Type Cover though...
Woot! Thanks man.RT. I've never used a Pro.
Have you played around with other browsers? If Surface/Win 8 takes off IE will draw crackers and I'd like to know how the alternatives are.Re-reading what I wrote, I realize I basically said that Surface is an awesome device for browsing the web. heh. Because no matter what tablet/device I have, that's basically all I do with it - whether Kindle Fire, iPad, or iPod Touch. Outside of a few games here and there.
Which works great for me! The extra productivity it allows is a nice bonus.
Gotta get my hands on a Type Cover though...
Oh I realize that by virtue of this being an extension of true Windows OS that software is likely less of an issue compared to their phone.iOS is at something like 400+ million since 2007. Vista was considered a failure, it sold something like 200 million. Windows 8 will sell, which means support for the new Windows UI which means support for Windows RT. I wouldn't worry about app support.
there will probably be about 10k at launch, at least worldwide.
The reviews are all quite clear what RT is about.
700 dollars after taxes lol. Next level ridiculous.The reviews actually made me want one (RT) a bit more. I only really use the browser on my iPad and also with my N7. Having chat and a browser side by side would be pretty awesome but I just can't get over dat $619 (CAD) price for only a Tegra 3 and a fucking 1366x768 screen.
yeah but best buy employees will inform them! lol. I would hate to be someone working at a help desk.Get a random person on the street, chances are that he/she doesn't know the difference.
Get a random person on the street, chances are that he/she doesn't know the difference.
I don't think any review really harped on the price point or even mentioned it.
Some of them certainly did.
Basically sounds like WP7. A lot of potential.
They need to get the software out there. That killed the phone for me. 2 years later and no TV Guide app?
Sounds like WP7 here as well.