tylrdiablos
Member
Another load of nothing.
and it looked absolutely incredible in the intro part
I am expecting it to be using Samsung 8 nm. Nintendo is too cheap for modern TSMC.
Who in this thread is engaging in a "decisional fantasy"? People have realistic expectations based on the known specs.Why are Nintendo fans still engaging in this delusional fantasy that the machine is going to be powerful? It’s a handheld and it’s Nintendo. Their devices are always going to be a 1.5 generations behind.
The bigger issue for me is if they launch with those shitty joycons. The quality of the joycons/switch lite sticks was pathetic.
This is what we haveIsn't the chip going to be Samsung 8nm only? This would seriously limit the clocks on this thing. I mean Sony just released a (supposedly) 4nm console... for a reason.
I would be more than happy with Series S power because i would only use it on my tv, but once again i would have to pay the hybrid tax and it's something Xbox One.
Why are Nintendo fans still engaging in this delusional fantasy that the machine is going to be powerful? It’s a handheld and it’s Nintendo. Their devices are always going to be a 1.5 generations behind.
The bigger issue for me is if they launch with those shitty joycons. The quality of the joycons/switch lite sticks was pathetic.
Agree, the Series S have that size and that power draw for some reason.It will not be Series S power. C’mon man.
Nobody is expecting that…Nintendo has never focused on the market or performance in their consoles. They have always made consoles exactly as they thought they needed for their tasks. That is why I am afraid that those who are expecting some extraordinary breakthroughs in terms of graphics, etc., will be disappointed. It is more likely that they will focus on stability and battery life. It is obvious that it will be technically better than the first console, but are we unlikely to see something breakthrough in technical terms, this is not their style. And no, this will not affect the console's sales in any way, it is very likely that it will be completely sold out in Japan almost immediately.
Well, you are in for a surprise then.
It would be a lot better... but we're talking about Nintendo.
There was a time where I thought they might use one of Samsung's better nodes... but the reports of Samsung cutting back on those makes me think that's unrealistic.
Powerful for a handheld. Like powerful for a lawnmower. Gotcha.It will not be Series S power. C’mon man.
It will be powerful for a handheld. Nobody expects it to rival current gen consoles, and you’re the delusional one for thinking this.
PS4 got ports of most games until this year. This should be more powerful than the PS4, running at Lower resolutions and with DLSS baked in.
Very likely that most third party devs will port to the Switch 2. Virtually all the Japanese games, for starters.
Or Nintendo could go full Wind Waker again, but this time use RTX hardware to do something novel with cell shading or a similar style.
Why are Nintendo fans still engaging in this delusional fantasy that the machine is going to be powerful? It’s a handheld and it’s Nintendo. Their devices are always going to be a 1.5 generations behind.
The bigger issue for me is if they launch with those shitty joycons. The quality of the joycons/switch lite sticks was pathetic.
Why even set those expectations? Are people seriously buying the Switch 2 to play PS4 games? Seems like a silly thing to do.People are expecting PS4 level of graphics. You think that’s not possible to achieve?
I really hope so. That’s the only way I’d even consider a Switch 2 this time around.You can't imagine how pleasing that sounded to my ears.
Hopefully the rumors are true and we get Hall Effect sticks this time.
Going to change my question due to you moving the goal post… Do you think that the Switch 2 is not going to receive those games?Why even set those expectations? Are people seriously buying the Switch 2 to play PS4 games? Seems like a silly thing to do.
Nintendo has been in its own category since the Wii. If people are excited to play the latest CD Project Red, Souls or Rockstar Game, they aren’t playing it on a Nintendo console — and yet people always hold out like there is a chance. It happens every generation.
I mean, it's not just mobile hardware, it's also going to have a much slimmer profile than comparable handheld gaming PC's, and it'll be around half the price. I wouldn't hold my breath for anything earth shattering.If it's close to a base ps4 in terms of graphics then that's pretty pathetic not going to lie especially cause this machine will have to last past the 2030s. I know the switch 2 is portable but good grief that's not even outdated tech, it's prehistoric tech at this stage. I doubt the switch 2 will even hit past 1080p 60fps for alot of games if that's the case.
Even more if using SEC 8nm, which would have a die ~2 times bigger. Is Nintendo interested in throwing money away now?
So, you want a Switch 2 that is going to be release next year with an 2024 or 2025 hardware?If it's close to a base ps4 in terms of graphics then that's pretty pathetic not going to lie especially cause this machine will have to last past the 2030s. I know the switch 2 is portable but good grief that's not even outdated tech, it's prehistoric tech at this stage. I doubt the switch 2 will even hit past 1080p 60fps for alot of games if that's the case.
Powerful for a handheld. Like powerful for a lawnmower. Gotcha.
Why even set those expectations? Are people seriously buying the Switch 2 to play PS4 games? Seems like a silly thing to do.
Nintendo has been in its own category since the Wii. If people are excited to play the latest CD Project Red, Souls or Rockstar Game, they aren’t playing it on a Nintendo console — and yet people always hold out like there is a chance. It happens every generation.
If it's close to a base ps4 in terms of graphics then that's pretty pathetic not going to lie especially cause this machine will have to last past the 2030s. I know the switch 2 is portable but good grief that's not even outdated tech, it's prehistoric tech at this stage. I doubt the switch 2 will even hit past 1080p 60fps for alot of games if that's the case.
The wafer is way cheaper though. Dropping the clock speed down as far as needed is yes what I expect them to do.
Still gonna be worse than a Series S and Series S is garbage already
It can't delivery what Nintendo needs, and that's what matters.
It was good enough for the Switch Pro... which is basically what this is 3 years later.
So Switch 2 will be somewhere between the Switch 1 and Steam Deck basically?
I think it will be able to run a game like God of War 2018 as well or better than a PS4 and 60fps and 1080p. Docked.So some people think:
PS3 < Switch < Switch 2 < Steam Deck <= PS4 < Ally X < PS5
Between PS3 (which Switch 1 passes) and PS4 (which Steam Deck is neck and neck with - but at a lower resolution. So Switch 2 will be somewhere between the Switch 1 and Steam Deck basically?
People tend to forget the docked factor in this conversation. I read somewhere that the power supply is rated at 40-50Watts and the dual fan solution.SD at minimum (but with better IQ because DLSS >>> FSR)
Well above SD when docked.
I read somewhere that the power supply is rated at 40-50Watts and the dual fan solution.
The size of the thermal solution inside the Switch is going to tell a lot and the 60W power unit is a really good sign, if they manage to get a good temperature when docked is a win.It's 60W. The dual fan thing was a misunderstanding (I think from that video from the chinese girl who made a mockup). The tablet has one fan, and the other fan is inside the dock (probably to help with the console drawing higher power this time plus a faster charging)
I just hope that they keep away from ray tracing .Take your best looking switch game add 30-35% at 1080p with limited “ray racing” just to say they have it for PR, and some upscaling trick to get “checkerboard 4k”
I don't get this mindset, from my perspective, you complaint also applies to any console out there, not so much to mid range PCs because CPU wide they're physically unreachable to consoles no matter how "optimized" the games are.What is it that you would expect from a developer who works on and wants to sell its product on the hardware? That it’s an underpowered hybrid portable? I’m also capable, of not spending one dime on Nintendo ever again. Get in the hardware race, your games are excellent and the hardware will sell (when has Nintendo even not sold hardware?), otherwise, cheap out with some outdated toy with a gimmick or two. Personally, never again.
That depends... Do Nintendo want me to pay €250 (max) or €400-500 ?I'll be disappointed if it doesn't match or surpass the base PS4. How many of you would honestly be let down if we got a handheld that could churn out games that look like Drive Club or Uncharted 4?
Because you can port a lot of today's PS5 games to PS4 level hardware. So as Switchc 2 will perform between a PS4 and Series S, it will be technically possible for third parties to bring a good chunk of their PS5s to the system.Why even set those expectations? Are people seriously buying the Switch 2 to play PS4 games? Seems like a silly thing to do.
Nintendo has been in its own category since the Wii. If people are excited to play the latest CD Project Red, Souls or Rockstar Game, they aren’t playing it on a Nintendo console — and yet people always hold out like there is a chance. It happens every generation.
Is this comprehension issue? Lol.Wut
Is this comprehension issue? When did anyone here say they want to play PS4 games on the Switch 2?
In a thread that is specifically about the power of the console (Graphics) of course people are going to use others systems to compare the power level, you are the one that’s implying others topics no related in the conversationIs this comprehension issue? Lol.
Not a great look when your insult is written in caveman.
Quite a few people in this thread are talking about the Switch 2 being able to play PS4-level games — dipshit. I question why it matters given that Nintendo fans, supposedly, prioritize innovation, gameplay, and portability.
Not at all.In a thread that is specifically about the power of the console (Graphics) of course people are going to use others systems to compare the power level, you are the one that’s implying others topics no related in the conversation
Quite a few people in this thread are talking about the Switch 2 being able to play PS4-level games — dipshit.
I question why it matters given that Nintendo fans, supposedly, prioritize innovation, gameplay, and portability.
So Nintendo decided on 8nm to save money, then built a chip so big they would have to disable parts of it to fit within their power budget. Sounds like a smart strategy.The wafer is way cheaper though. Dropping the clock speed down as far as needed is yes what I expect them to do.
They should still be able to hit PS4ish performance. But nothing PS4 Proish.
Not at all.
I never said it wasn’t related to the conversation — only that I didn’t understand why the conversation around “power” and “non-portable console comparisons” continued to happen given the priorities that are most often associated with Nintendo consoles.
I personally buy Nintendo consoles because I know that the 1st party games are guaranteed to be highly polished, fun, and possess a unique art style. That seems to be consistent with most Nintendo fans.
I don't see anything wrong to talk about this ,and is pretty obvious that people are interested in the topic.Not at all.
I never said it wasn’t related to the conversation — only that I didn’t understand why the conversation around “power” and “non-portable console comparisons” continued to happen given the priorities that are most often associated with Nintendo consoles.
I personally buy Nintendo consoles because I know that the 1st party games are guaranteed to be highly polished, fun, and possess a unique art style. That seems to be consistent with most Nintendo fans.