Switch 2 Display Tested. Afterimage is due to "incredibly slow" response time

Damn this is so much ordinary social media quality console warring post that I had to check if I was in NeoGAF, not kidding
Funny how telling the truth about hardware gets labeled as "warring" now. Maybe if more people spoke up early, we wouldn't be normalizing this slow erosion of consumer expectations.
 
I'll never stop refuting the idea that the screen is good enough though - a 30ms response time for 8ms frames @ 120fps gaming, is just fucking stupid tech. The pixel response time should be faster the frame time, for it to be greater is just dumb.
The entire Switch 2 signal chain is likely greater than 100ms so the 30ms extra should be considered in that context.
 
I tried to warn people they needed to wait on this sucker. There is no defense for paying for crap quality, especially from Nintendo. The joycons still develop drift, the sub temu quality screen, and under-clocking the processor to prevent a fireball in your hands, and the short battery life…..and we aren't even a month out from launch! 😂 Yes sir, that's $450 well spent! They have to be making bank on profit margin because they sure as hell didn't spend much on R&D, quality, or game development!
Underclocked compared to what? The Switch 2 delivers comparable performance to the Steam Deck in portable mode, at less than half the power consumption, on a worse process.
 
Top Bottom