Switch 2 Display Tested. Afterimage is due to "incredibly slow" response time

Damn this is so much ordinary social media quality console warring post that I had to check if I was in NeoGAF, not kidding
Funny how telling the truth about hardware gets labeled as "warring" now. Maybe if more people spoke up early, we wouldn't be normalizing this slow erosion of consumer expectations.
 
I'll never stop refuting the idea that the screen is good enough though - a 30ms response time for 8ms frames @ 120fps gaming, is just fucking stupid tech. The pixel response time should be faster the frame time, for it to be greater is just dumb.
The entire Switch 2 signal chain is likely greater than 100ms so the 30ms extra should be considered in that context.
 
I tried to warn people they needed to wait on this sucker. There is no defense for paying for crap quality, especially from Nintendo. The joycons still develop drift, the sub temu quality screen, and under-clocking the processor to prevent a fireball in your hands, and the short battery life…..and we aren't even a month out from launch! 😂 Yes sir, that's $450 well spent! They have to be making bank on profit margin because they sure as hell didn't spend much on R&D, quality, or game development!
Underclocked compared to what? The Switch 2 delivers comparable performance to the Steam Deck in portable mode, at less than half the power consumption, on a worse process.
 
My phone served me an article from some site that said the Switch 2 screen "isn't even as fast as a standard gaming monitor" lol

Switch 2 has a slower response screen than Switch 1, that's a fact. How this fact rewrote how we compare screens I don't know.
 
Last edited:
Switch 2 has a slower response screen than Switch 2, that's a fact.

Ufc 205 Mma GIF by UFC
 
Brilliant tactic by Nintendo, the hardcore fanboys won't care the ass display and the rest will simply wait for HDR version. Well played Nintendo, well played.
 
this is assuming the screen can be upgraded via a firmware update. Not all LCD panels have that ability.

Which means....

1) The screen can be updated, but Nintendo won't do it
2) The screen is updated by Nintendo, but they may or may not tell anyone
3) The screen can't be updated and Nintendo will never say a word about it
 
this is assuming the screen can be upgraded via a firmware update. Not all LCD panels have that ability.
You're wrong. It's impossible to have a display with VRR and HDR that does not have a controller with firmware that connects to it and "negotiates" the signal with the console hardware. That said, I doubt Nintendo will take action on this because it's a minor issue.
 
You're wrong. It's impossible to have a display with VRR and HDR that does not have a controller with firmware that connects to it and "negotiates" the signal with the console hardware. That said, I doubt Nintendo will take action on this because it's a minor issue.

Just because it has a controller with firmware, does that mean the firmware can be updated by the user via the normal UI?
 
Last edited:
Just because it has a controller with firmware, does that mean the firmware can be updated by the user via the normal UI?
Of course Nintendo can, the system updates are installed "from outside" the system sandbox itself, obviously with all the corresponding signatures and security measures.
 
Of course Nintendo can, the system updates are installed "from outside" the system sandbox itself, obviously with all the corresponding signatures and security measures.

Fair enough. I don't recall ever having to update a screen's firmware before so I have no idea how that would work.
 
Hmmm, the ghosting/motion blur from the screen must make a great combination with the foggy, washed out visuals of Mario Kart World.

This game will only ever look good with emulation. On a proper monitor. With a haze removal mod.
 
Top Bottom