holygeesus
Banned
The OLED burn in you guys are posting is scaring me from actually jumping into OLED :/.
Why would you ignore the 99% of people without issues, posting in this thread?
The OLED burn in you guys are posting is scaring me from actually jumping into OLED :/.
Why would you ignore the 99% of people without issues, posting in this thread?
The OLED burn in you guys are posting is scaring me from actually jumping into OLED :/.
Lol hey it's ok, no tech is perfect but i do believe oled could be the best when they iron out all the differences like panel uniformity, higher nits and (most important to me) motion resolution. The MR on a c7 is 300 lines...there is no way i am buying a premium 4k oled when it can't even do 1080 lines. My plasma resolves 1080+ lines, you might not notice when you watch 24fps movies but when you switch to 60fps it's a complete game changer playing Nier: Automata for example. I think i'll keep my plasma for a little while longer until they iron out the kinks .
Motion Resolution comparison:
ZT60
C7
Again i am more impressed with everything the oled has going for (the amazing infinite contrast with HDR). However to me especially when playing high framerate games MR is King and i will gladly jump on the oled bandwagon when the display can natively do more than 1080 lines of MR beating my plasma. No BFI that ruins the hdr or introduces flickering, just natively. I believe the phillips oled is the only one that does 600 iirc natively without introducing bfi or lowering the brightness. That's impressive so hopefully Sony and LG follow. However to me 300 lines is unacceptable.
edit: Updated with higher res picture.
Vincent Teoh wasn't bothered by the motion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7agX6EpYvI
Because those 99% people could also easily get burn-in/retention.
OLEDs are unreliable, and demand constant care in order to keep them in good health.
Because those 99% people could also easily get burn-in/retention.
OLEDs are unreliable, and demand constant care in order to keep them in good health.
I've been looking at sets recently, and what I have a hard time grasping is relative value. With GPUs and such it's easier to gauge value because performance is benchmarked and I can judge for myself if the price increase is worth the extra money to go from a 1070 to 1080 or 1080Ti.
But with TVs, even with rtings's reviews, it seems like the whole thing is still pretty vague when trying to determine for value.
TCL's 605/607 ($600-650) seems like a pretty decent set for budget HDR, and rtings even suggests it over Vizio's M-series ($700), but the P-series ($820 for 2016s) is considered superior to both, but is it $200 better?
And Sony's X900E is supposed to be a great LED set, but the prices seem absurdly high, even on sale, at $1000-1200, when OLED sets like LG's B6 or C7 can be had for $1400 on a good sale. What's the point of the X900E?
It seems like TVs operate in tiers, with major performance breakpoints, but what do you really judge when considering performance?
Oled displays the frame for the duration of frame and the other flickers the 'backlight'.The burn in issues are blown out of proportion. Some people play with high brightness and don't even experience any issues.
Holy shit what a big difference, why is it like that??? Might be the reason why all the videos I see at Best Buy are slow-mo panning in order to help hide that?
Oled displays the frame for the duration of frame and the other flickers the 'backlight'.
Image seen here is taken with moving camera, so the image from oled looks blurred and the other has visible light for very small duration and thus looks sharp.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNb3X1AM6uI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGeM6S_m9pI
Oled displays the frame for the duration of frame and the other flickers the 'backlight'.
Image seen here is taken with moving camera, so the image from oled looks blurred and the other has visible light for very small duration and thus looks sharp.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNb3X1AM6uI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGeM6S_m9pI
Sadly I simply cannot look something that flickers at 60hz, so normal refreshrate with black frame insertion is not choice for me.
24fps movie with BFI would be horrible. (Which is why theaters used to show same image several times, which results double or triple image in moving camera test..)
Um, the ZT60 is a plasma TV. It doesn't have a backlight, it doesn't do BFI.
Even a small chance of BI is too high when it isn't covered under manufacturer warranty, especially with how expensive these sets are. It also makes OLED a no go for those of us who use our living room TVs as PC monitors.Why would you ignore the 99% of people without issues, posting in this thread?
Because those 99% people could also easily get burn-in/retention.
OLEDs are unreliable, and demand constant care in order to keep them in good health.
I got the LG55B6v model couple of weeks ago and I am wondering the following:
I find that Full RGB + High Black works for me really well, especially in HDR with Normal Color Gammut (tested with Ratchet and Clank + The Surge)
I've used the Digital Foundrys set-up-video to set up the settings, but are these settings correct? Should I use Limited RGB + Low Blacks? I'd like to get the maximum benefit... :/ I find the Limited+Low to be... I dunno, less colorful?
As I understand it RGB 4:4:4 doesn't support hdr
Check the video settings from the PS4 when the game is running you will find if it's hdr it's not RGB. I think.
In other words it's RGB before the game starts then switches down to 4:2:0 or whatever when game starts.
Holy shit what a big difference, why is it like that??? Might be the reason why all the videos I see at Best Buy are slow-mo panning in order to help hide that?
When The Surge is running, Video Output Information says:
COLOUR FORMAT: RGB(HDR)
HDR ON YOUR TV: SUPPORTED
Supported but game isn't running in hdr?
At least for me horizon zero dawn switches down from RGB if hdr is enabled, even if RGB is set. And if you google it you can see posts saying hdr isn't supported over RGB and 4k but I am no expert on this so maybe those posts are wrong or something changed recently.
The game is running in HDR. It has individual settings and the mode is HDR(Gaming) when I look the settings from the TV.
Plasma displays naturally fade the pixels to black between each update, due to how they work, which increases motion clarity. OLEDs and LCDs don't, they display the pixel for the full duration of the frame until it's updated with a new value. To simulate what plasmas do you can do black frame insertion on an OLED/LCD, which improves motion resolution but causes flicker and makes the image darker.
Motion Resolution comparison:
ZT60
C7
As I understand it RGB 4:4:4 doesn't support hdr
Check the video settings from the PS4 when the game is running you will find if it's hdr it's not RGB. I think.
In other words it's RGB before the game starts then switches down to 4:2:2 or whatever when game starts.
Plasma displays naturally fade the pixels to black between each update, due to how they work, which increases motion clarity. OLEDs and LCDs don't, they display the pixel for the full duration of the frame until it's updated with a new value. To simulate what plasmas do you can do black frame insertion on an OLED/LCD, which improves motion resolution but causes flicker and makes the image darker.
I gave up trying to understand what is actually happening when trying to play a game in HDR through RGB, since it doesn't output in 10-bit, yet it's clearly not playing in SDR. This is primarily a thing on PC though. As far as the Pro goes, I've done auto, RGB and 4:2:0 and they all end up looking the same once HDR kicks in.
Because those 99% people could also easily get burn-in/retention.
OLEDs are unreliable, and demand constant care in order to keep them in good health.
Not sure how easily these OLEDs could get burn-in, but image retention seems to be way better than any plasma I've owned which would easily get IR in a matter of minutes (but would go away just as quickly). I've become used to IR and I've learned to live with it as it fades away before most people (who aren't aware of it) will even notice. I've been all over my kids about leaving games paused on the plasma but thus far, I've noticed exactly zero IR on my B7 (and I've looked for it).Because those 99% people could also easily get burn-in/retention.
OLEDs are unreliable, and demand constant care in order to keep them in good health.
I still don't see where this "demands constant care" sentiment comes from, or how "easily" burn-in is supposed to happen, when we've had multiple people post here about abusing their TVs like no tomorrow with no burn-in.
Some people have clearly been unlucky with their OLEDs (there was one dude whose quick setting menu had burned-in in the AVS thread Paragon posted a link to earlier), but nothing in this thread has indicated that it's nearly as big a risk as you're implying with your obvious choice of words.
You have to be more careful with OLEDs, and there's always a risk of burn-in happening, that much is absolutely true. If you have your OLED on for hours on end with static bright yellow and red elements on the screen, you will very likely suffer from burn-in. If not doing that means the TV "demands constant care", I guess the TV really needs to be babied.
I'm coming from exclusively being a plasma TV owner.
I got the LG55B6v model couple of weeks ago and I am wondering the following:
I find that Full RGB + High Black works for me really well, especially in HDR with Normal Color Gammut (tested with Ratchet and Clank + The Surge)
I've used the Digital Foundrys set-up-video to set up the settings, but are these settings correct? Should I use Limited RGB + Low Blacks? I'd like to get the maximum benefit... :/ I find the Limited+Low to be... I dunno, less colorful?
Edit: wow, should propably mention I still have the PS4 original.
For HDR on base PS4 the combination Full RGB / High Blacks is the correct setting. The combination Limited RGB / Low Blacks is buggy for some reason and produces crushed blacks. For SDR content both combinations work fine. Just keep in mind that when watching BluRay movies the PS4 is forced into Limited RGB and you'll have to switch the Tv to Low Blacks.
Should you ever upgrade to the Pro then Limited RGB / Low Blacks will be the correct setting.
Well you're not going to find a 4K TV with 1080 lines of motion resolution I don't think. Honestly I doubt you'll be bothered by the downgrade for longer than a day at most. I'm sure you'd get used to it, no?
IIRC, I think Vincent from HDTVTest said that if you max out BFI on the Sonys you can get 1080 lines of motion resolution.
It depends on operation time. I think Kyoufu has said he's used his TV a lot, and at max OLED light, something which seems few are doing here. Guess that's not a good combo.
I think he also said the side-effects of doing this weren't worth it, no?
For HDR on base PS4 the combination Full RGB / High Blacks is the correct setting. The combination Limited RGB / Low Blacks is buggy for some reason and produces crushed blacks. For SDR content both combinations work fine. Just keep in mind that when watching BluRay movies the PS4 is forced into Limited RGB and you'll have to switch the Tv to Low Blacks.
Should you ever upgrade to the Pro then Limited RGB / Low Blacks will be the correct setting.
So these 4K HDR TVs still do limited RGB range (or rather, don't do full range)? Interesting, was wondering about that.
What am I looking at? Is this supposed to be similar to the old duck in a race car image to show ghosting? Otherwise, is it panel specific? Because I don't notice poor horizontal scrolling in most games on the B6, and anything noticeable is usually from the default motion blur anyway. The only negative effect I've seen regarding handling would be judder in some slow panning shows.
Or maybe my G10 was just terrible, because I don't notice any difference on the B6 in comparison.
Holy shit what a big difference, why is it like that??? Might be the reason why all the videos I see at Best Buy are slow-mo panning in order to help hide that?
Lol hey it's ok, no tech is perfect but i do believe oled could be the best when they iron out all the differences like panel uniformity, higher nits and (most important to me) motion resolution. The MR on a c7 is 300 lines...there is no way i am buying a premium 4k oled when it can't even do 1080 lines. My plasma resolves 1080+ lines, you might not notice when you watch 24fps movies but when you switch to 60fps it's a complete game changer playing Nier: Automata for example. I think i'll keep my plasma for a little while longer until they iron out the kinks .
Motion Resolution comparison:
ZT60
C7
I can try... but I don't have OLED light and contrast jacked like that. I've never been a fan of the super bright screens and turning down the OLED light on my B7 was one of the first settings changes I made. I haven't gone through a full calibration yet, but my contrast is around 85 as well I believe.Can someone try out Slime Rancher on their OLED and see if it creates retention way too quickly as well? Just as quick as when the Xbox dash is on, or Netflix app etc. OLED light and contrast at 100.
Maybe it IS something that shouldn't happen and in that case I'll call repair service.
Well fuck.....
Started up Slime Rancher on Xbox One and the HUD created retention incredibly fast on my 65B6. I immediately saw it when I went to the Xbox settings menu, which is grey.
So sadly there ARE games where the HUD is too bright. It disappears fairly quickly but man I just don't like that shit.
Wish devs would give us HUD opacity options or let us disable it completely.
Well you're not going to find a 4K TV with 1080 lines of motion resolution I don't think. Honestly I doubt you'll be bothered by the downgrade for longer than a day at most. I'm sure you'd get used to it, no?
No it's not panel specific, all oled's have 300 lines of motion resolution. The Panasonic G10 uses a 600hz sub-field drive and the ZT60 uses 3,000hz FFD plus improved panel driving even compared to the VT60 series. So currently it has the highest motion resolution of any display to my knowledge, it's not even a fair comparison with the G10. If you don't notice the difference then that's all that matters, it's one of the only things the plasma is still the king of. Everything else the oled completely destroys it. That's why i can't wait until they improve the oled's motion resolution. I can't imagine 2,000+ lines of moving resolution in hdr with 0 black.
Speaking of calibration, are there guides for folks with zero calibration equipment around? LG B7 here.
I've been pretty much playing with picture settings that look good to me, but I'm sure the picture is far from what it, well, should look.
Retention is a sure thing on OLED, but it's minor and disappears fast and usually isn't visible in content.
Burn in is rare / hard