Crash Station
Member
It being brought over at all beyond streaming might be controversial. I mean, it's a series with terrorists given the sympathetic point of view. Not the kind of thing you see here ever.
The two smoldering buildings in the back of that picture seems in really poor taste, especially with the terrorist premise. Wonder if that gets erased for the western localization.
The two smoldering buildings in the back of that picture seems in really poor taste, especially with the terrorist premise. Wonder if that gets erased for the western localization.
It being brought over at all beyond streaming might be controversial. I mean, it's a series with terrorists given the sympathetic point of view. Not the kind of thing you see here ever.
The two smoldering buildings in the back of that picture seems in really poor taste, especially with the terrorist premise. Wonder if that gets erased for the western localization.
I would argue that the terrorists aren't really made out to be sympathetic, at least to judge by the first episode. There's something inhuman about their behavior and attitudes.
Perhaps, but I imagine their apparently shitty back stories will cast them in a more sympathetic light, even if they aren't exactly portrayed as the "good guys".
Perhaps, but I imagine their apparently shitty back stories will cast them in a more sympathetic light, even if they aren't exactly portrayed as the "good guys".
Yeah, the show really has to be careful. I mean, it's not like this would be the first show to have protagonist or main characters be bad guys or evil. But since this is a very modern subject (and very important topic), it really has to be handled well. I have no issue with terrorists having a sympathetic history. Fact is, not all bad people are born bad. And some criminals can be sympathetic.
It doesn't excuse their actions, or justify them. So that's really what is important here. We need to know what exactly they are doing (why they are doing it), and then see if the show tries to justify the actions. Personally, assuming that people actually were killed in this terrorist attack, no back story will justify what they did (and I hope the show doesn't try to justify it). But that doesn't mean you can't still find their story sympathetic.
How would that be any different from terrorists in real life though? They all mostly have shitty stories or reasons for being what they are. Terrorism is just an active form of expressing a strong ideology in the wrong way. That ideology comes from somewhere. Is the Palestinian situation not sympathetic? Is Israel really the "good guy" in the conflict? Does the IRA create public disturbance because they're just bad people with no backgrounds? Or are they waging a domestic battle indoctrinated by generations of hatred, bloodshed, and perceived oppression?
I think they should play this completely straight to be honest, but the way that first episode came off, with the chick and "9" (is it 9?) it seems like they will try to create a sympathetic back story, probably something along the lines of them doing it to honor a fallen friend or something.
I don't feel what they're doing is likely something sentimental or emotional like that. It seems there's a planned timeline and specific tasks and objectives. They stole the nuclear materials, disappeared again for 6 months, reappeared to create panic. There's definitely a larger game plan here, and it seems to be about destabilization. Considering the inspiration here is is a modern brand of terrorism, it is likely that the aim is public chaos and making people think of a message they're sending. Considering this is set in Japan though, that's probably the trickiest part in terms of logic. It's a pretty apathetic society in general when it comes to politics and ideologies.
How would that be any different from terrorists in real life though? They all mostly have shitty stories or reasons for being what they are. Terrorism is just an active form of expressing a strong ideology in the wrong way. That ideology comes from somewhere. Is the Palestinian situation not sympathetic? Is Israel really the "good guy" in the conflict? Does the IRA create public disturbance because they're just bad people with no backgrounds? Or are they waging a domestic battle indoctrinated by generations of hatred, bloodshed, and perceived oppression?
The two smoldering buildings in the back of that picture seems in really poor taste, especially with the terrorist premise. Wonder if that gets erased for the western localization.
It's only one episode in so I could be wrong, they made it seem like it was definitely a message driven thing. Obviously a mix of destabilization and some sort of disruption plan. I think the thing that bugs me is that they brought the whole girl into the equation, which could work out as a sort of "falls into corruption" like storyline or a "I feel like I finally am free from BS like girls picking on me at school". That's the X factor to me, like I said it is only one episode so it doesn't mean much yet.I don't feel what they're doing is likely something sentimental or emotional like that. It seems there's a planned timeline and specific tasks and objectives. They stole the nuclear materials, disappeared again for 6 months, reappeared to create panic. There's definitely a larger game plan here, and it seems to be about destabilization. Considering the inspiration here is is a modern brand of terrorism, it is likely that the aim is public chaos and making people think of a message they're sending. Considering this is set in Japan though, that's probably the trickiest part in terms of logic. It's a pretty apathetic society in general when it comes to politics and ideologies.
I was just answering Hosanna where the sympathy could come from. It's a touchy subject, so I'm just surprised to see it handled in such a way in a major Watanabe anime.
I didn't think of the design being reminiscent, but this talk about sympathizing with terrorists did make me think of them and other terrorists/criminals who have been idolized.
Oh and by the way, am I the only who's getting an eerie resemblance to the Boston Marathon Bombers with the design of Twelve and Nine...?
Just got finished from peeping the premiere of TIR and I personally loved it..
PROS
- Truly intriguing concept/plot
- Refreshing contemporary atmosphere
- Very thought provoking structure
- Smooth story pacing (thus far)
- Minimal fan service
- Lush animation and cinematography
- Brilliant soundtrack from Yoko Kanno
- One of the best OP/ED this season
- Easily the best Watanabe premiere since Samurai Champloo (IMO)
CONS
- Story may become to convoluted
- Lead characters have slight shojo cliches
- Disturbing subject matter, that may be too unsettling for some
Overall, I'm really hyped to see the progression of this series.
Oh and by the way, am I the only who's getting an eerie resemblance to the Boston Marathon Bombers with the design of Twelve and Nine...?
neither look anything like the other two
This and your comparison pictures are ridiculous. Literally faulting a show for a problem you THINK might happen
I thought funimation put their content on hulu?
Is there a way to watch this without giving Funi money?
Poor taste? It's what the show is about. Why would it be erased? It's a real building in Japan, one of the most ironic government buildings in Tokyo.
Oh and by the way, am I the only who's getting an eerie resemblance to the Boston Marathon Bombers with the design of Twelve and Nine...?
I've only just had the chance to watch the first episode (I know, a whole DAY after it aired! That means it's gone from the zeitgeist!)
It's far too early for me to effectively comment on the characters and I'm not invested in them yet as a result outside perhaps of the desk-job detective who is the most intriguing of the lot of them. Nine's "angst" is a little too heavily telegraphed (albeit with a beautiful flashback) and Twelve's psychotic happiness will need more detail.
What I would say is that Risa is likely to "make or break" the show for me (well, her and Five, but she's not in the story yet). The reason I didn't care for Samurai Champloo was that Fuu was an adjunct to the main story (and a ditzy useless one at that in the episodes I saw). If Risa serves merely as a slightly wet "window" into the world of Sphinx then I will probably not enjoy the show much. I don't think that's going to be the case, but then I'm not sure what I would actually be interested to see from her as yet.
I can, however, remark on the expert crafting of both the pre-credits sequence and the entirety of the second half of the episode in particular. The sustained tension of the whole bombing sequence was down to the excellent pacing and structure; it kept the audience guessing at what exactly was happening and how, both on the human level (when Risa and Twelve meet on the stairway, for instance, or how Nine reacts), and on a more "physical" level. I loved the way the bombs worked, for instance - a straightforward bomb would be much more predictable but the chemical element seemed fascinating.
I wonder why the detective is working a desk job?
Anyway, I was very much looking forward to this and did enjoy the first ep a lot, although it didn't blow me away or anything (it lived up to my expectations, though, which is a good thing!).
Only seen episode 1 but Shibasaki wasn't even a character yet. He had so few scenes. More interested in learning bout Risa and 12
I'm not sure we can say this yet but I see where you're coming. The way I look it is two characters who dealing with their apparent trauma in different ways.Ah, but in those scenes we see:
i) he obviously was once a detective but isn't any longer
ii) he pays attention to small details
iii) he's interested in logic and strategy (note him playing shogi against himself)
iv) he might like fishing (he's reading Tsuri Bakka Nishi instead of working!)
Risa is potentially interesting, as I mentioned before, but although I find Nine and Twelve plenty watchable they seem cut from a cloth we see fairly frequently and are presented as diametric opposites. One's ice cold, the other psychotically happy. I'm sure they'll be eminently watchable and have appropriately interesting backstories, but thus far Shibasaki's my fave
I will admit to having a bit of a "thing" about detective characters in shows which aren't necessarily about them, which might be colouring my judgement here. My favourite character in Darker Than Black, for instance, was Misaki.
I think in terms of general characterizations, all the characters in the show are pretty representative of stock tropes. There's the serious stoic guy with glasses, the carefree but capable guy with messy hair, the awkward girl with family and social problems who gets taken out of her boring "normal" life by running into these two hot guys, the has-been detective looking for a chance to have a moment of glory again.
Nothing wrong with that though, since archetypes aren't good or bad on their own, it all depends on what the narrative does with them and how they are developed.
Haha, yes. We're on the same page.I will admit to having a bit of a "thing" about detective characters in shows which aren't necessarily about them, which might be colouring my judgement here. My favourite character in Darker Than Black, for instance, was Misaki.
It's not really puzzling that people find the heist really easy to pull off. Yeah I known they heist was extensively planned/prepared for. However, they could have shown more details in how it went down instead ofYes I know more things actually took place to place during it, but I like intricate details in my heists dammit!Just throw a grenade at the fence bust out of the truck with a sweet snowmobile.
The opening heist was still great, and if it was done how I wanted it then it would have ended up looking like shit anyways.
Man, if the crux of their motives are just making a statement against something like adulthood or an aspect of society, I'll be bummed.