I feel like I'm going mad. That TT UI looks fantastic to me. Perfectly-placed, flexible and unobtrusive.
And I generally dislike Audis.
Oh come on dude. You can't change entire industries and outperform NASA/ESA/Boeing/GM/VW/Ford FROM SCRATCH paying people $35 an hour to stand there and go "thats not my job" or "I'm grieving". Both companies are 100% upfront about what it takes to work there. Longer than average hours and slightly underpayed will be worth it if you wake up every morning believing what you do (how else have they gotten some of the best workforces in the country?). Not to mention the stock options will make a stupid amount of money.
Those UIs are hideous up above.
I've never seen more ridiculous arguments than in tesla threads, people talking about why it won't work for some .05% of the population or why tesla won't be successful in general.
This is not a great UI. The date and time are given as much space as the map, which makes the map way too small for useful navigating.
That's not navigation mode
This is navigation mode
I agree with date/time being given too much screen real estate
Genuine question, slightly hypothetical, and not trying to start any arguments, but is there any specific reasons why one would consider a Tesla once other OEMs catch up?
I know there's some fun stuff they do, but in terms of build quality, reliability, styling, comfort, handling, I can't see myself buying a Tesla over, say, a BMW with equivalent electric power train.
I'm tempted by a Tesla, but I feel like their USP will be short-lived.
Its those outlandish colors.Try driving a yellow car. I've received a 71 in a 70.
Genuine question, slightly hypothetical, and not trying to start any arguments, but is there any specific reasons why one would consider a Tesla once other OEMs catch up?
I know there's some fun stuff they do, but in terms of build quality, reliability, styling, comfort, handling, I can't see myself buying a Tesla over, say, a BMW with equivalent electric power train.
I'm tempted by a Tesla, but I feel like their USP will be short-lived.
Most of the other OEMs are still building cars the same way they've been for decades. I really like the things that Tesla is doing:
- Putting the battery in the floor which lowers the center of gravity and makes the car feel more grounded. All of the early Model 3 impressions have been that it handles really well, with no body roll. Combine that with the instant torque and I'm anticipating an electric car that's a blast to drive. Feels like having your cake and eating it too.
- The minimalist interior has way less parts, which I believe over time will result in the car aging better. For all the talk about German engineering/build quality, every BMW I've ever driven (including my current F30) develops horrible rattling over time.
- I like that Tesla designs their cars from the ground up as EVs, vs OEMs that just take existing platforms and slap electric motors in them.
- Tesla is like...light years ahead of the other OEMs in terms of their ability to manage and update software. BMW in particular seems to be falling behind. Audi's new MMI and electronic instrument cluster is nice. It's obvious they took a lot of influence from the Model S.
- I think that over time once Tesla works thru various design bugs (which are inevitable with any new product), their cars will be more reliable. Less moving parts, less fluids, less stuff to break. Obviously this assumes that improving quality/reliability is something that remains a priority for Tesla.
- In terms of exterior looks, I love my F30 and honestly think it looks better than a Model 3. But I think the Model 3 is pretty nice as well, and looks way better than the EV competition.
- I think OEMs will catch up on the mechanical side, but it remains to be seen whether they can match Tesla's software engineering capabilities. Most auto manufacturers just seem to be completely awful at software and technology in general.
Most of your points are simply due to next to no other OEM presenting a car fully planned to be an EV. Which should change until the end of the decade.
Concerning sw, this is due to the more safety oriented approach that was (and theoretically still is) imposed on the industry. As a result, Sw engineer up till now were much, mcuh more limited than what we know and are used to from the consumer electronics; given what they had, ACC for example in the early 2000 is on the contrary quite impressive. Wich Tesla brough to a change, for better or for worse (I sill hink their certification method in the EU should be forbidden).
right but to my knowledge the only non american car company that's even pledged to going EV is Porsche and they literally just announced that like last month. Beyond that unless the other auto manufacturers partner with tesla or partner with each other none of them will have access to charging stations for road trips.
FRANKFURT (Reuters) - Volkswagen (VOWG_p.DE) the world's largest carmaker by sales, is looking to loss-making startup Tesla (TSLA.O) for inspiration on how to improve its core business, the VW brand's chief executive Herbert Diess said in an interview published on VW's website.
Asked who VWs main competitors are, Diess told an internal company publication: In the old world it is Toyota, Hyundai, and the French carmakers. In the new world it is Tesla."
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-volkswagen-tesla-diess-idUSKBN1AK261Diess said the Volkswagen brand, which sold 5,987,800 cars last year, is seeking to catch up with and overtake smaller California-based Tesla, which sold 83,922 cars last year.
"Tesla belongs among the competitors which has abilities that we currently do not have," Diess said in the interview with "Inside", a publication for VW employees.
Around half of Tesla's engineers are software experts, while at VW's core brand it is a much lower proportion, Diess said. Tesla has good electric motors, a fast charging network, autonomous driving technology, internet connectivity, and a new approach toward vehicle distribution.
"This shows that we need to significantly improve. We can do this. We measure ourselves against Tesla quite deliberately. Our goal: Using our abilities not just to catch up, but even to overtake, Diess, who drives an electric VW Golf, said.
Lol chief simulator. The navigation view has a few different views to itAudi engineers are fans of Halo confirmed.
right but to my knowledge the only non american car company that's even pledged to going EV is Porsche and they literally just announced that like last month. Beyond that unless the other auto manufacturers partner with tesla or partner with each other none of them will have access to charging stations for road trips.
Most of your points are simply due to next to no other OEM presenting a car fully planned to be an EV. Which should change until the end of the decade.
Concerning sw, this is due to the more safety oriented approach that was (and theoretically still is) imposed on the industry. As a result, Sw engineer up till now were much, mcuh more limited than what we know and are used to from the consumer electronics; given what they had, ACC for example in the early 2000 is on the contrary quite impressive. Wich Tesla brough to a change, for better or for worse (I sill hink their certification method in the EU should be forbidden).
VW group owns Porsche. Was not aware of Volvo.VW and Volvo have already announced they are going fully electric. VW also has a charging network in the planning stages. They have pledged to use some of the settlement money they are paying to the US Government for the diesel scandal to build out a network in North America.
VW and Volvo have already announced they are going fully electric. VW also has a charging network in the planning stages. They have pledged to use some of the settlement money they are paying to the US Government for the diesel scandal to build out a network in North America.
VW group owns Porsche.
Was not aware of Volvo.
VW group owns Porsche. Was not aware of Volvo.
I guess the real question is, will the other OEMs actually catch up? The assumption in the post that I quoted seems to be yes, but we still haven't really seen it yet. My point is that Tesla is innovating by doing things that IMO the other car companies could have (and should have) been doing already. It's a classic case of Innovator's Dilemma.
I don't think Volvo has said they're going fully electric, just that by 2020 they wont sell any gas-only vehicles
Mercedes have also just anounced billions in EV investments.
All three premium germans should release at least one EV exclusive model before 2020. I seem to remember they announced they would unify their charging stations to have broader reach.
The Renault/Nissan alliance is also the biggest EV seller in number of cars with their leaf/Zoe (which are decently good and affordable city EVs)
Oh yeah, definitively. While I hate the overhype on Tesla, their shakeup of the concervative OEM mindset is great.
But most of the negative points you cited stemmed only from the fact that next to no other OEM has an EV only car/plateform. If they have that (ie catch up in the post yoh quoted), the main difference may be the charging infrastructure. Which is a rather big one, but independent of the cars themselves.
But considering the billions they are investing, and don't see most of the OEM not catching up.
You're right that in the interim they will still have hybrids but as they have announced they have terminated all development of diesel engines it's fairly clear that they view hybrids as transitional only.
there's no way in hell i can drive a car with an Ipad to my right. That makes no fucking sense. The Audi TT has a virtual dashboard that loosk way better. I hope they can update it as well
Is there a spec sheet for the car? Insurance company needs the following and probably more:
Daytime Running Lights
Anti-Lock Brakes
Electronic Stability Control
Adaptive Cruise Control
Collision Preparation System
Blind Spot Warning
Lane Departure Warning
Adaptive Headlights
Rear View Camera
Driver Alertness
Don't they get what they need from the vin?
Where did you get 1060 from? Nvidia's automotive products use Tegra technology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive_PX-series
Teslas have the Nvidia Drive PX2 but unlike Nvidia's other automotive partners, Tesla programs their own custom AI software.
I think more than 4 hours without a break is advised against because of the threat of clots and embolisms.
I guess the real question is, will the other OEMs actually catch up? The assumption in the post that I quoted seems to be yes, but we still haven't really seen it yet. My point is that Tesla is innovating by doing things that IMO the other car companies could have (and should have) been doing already. It's a classic case of Innovator's Dilemma.
Eh, just a few years ago Tesla was simply tossing an electric drive train onto an existing chassis.
Major manufacturers can catch up if they throw resources behind it.
Most of the other OEMs are still building cars the same way they've been for decades. I really like the things that Tesla is doing:
- Tesla is like...light years ahead of the other OEMs in terms of their ability to manage and update software. BMW in particular seems to be falling behind. Audi's new MMI and electronic instrument cluster is nice. It's obvious they took a lot of influence from the Model S.
- I think that over time once Tesla works thru various design bugs (which are inevitable with any new product), their cars will be more reliable. Less moving parts, less fluids, less stuff to break. Obviously this assumes that improving quality/reliability is something that remains a priority for Tesla.
- In terms of exterior looks, I love my F30 and honestly think it looks better than a Model 3. But I think the Model 3 is pretty nice as well, and looks way better than the EV competition.
- I think OEMs will catch up on the mechanical side, but it remains to be seen whether they can match Tesla's software engineering capabilities. Most auto manufacturers just seem to be completely awful at software and technology in general.
When VW, BMW, Mercedes and Toyota are all selling electric cars in let's say, 2022, why would the customer choose Tesla at that point? Definitely not because of the design. I think their window is too small and the competition too strong for the long haul. Still love what a Tesla is doing but time will tell.
Depends on whether or not they can hire top-class software engineers. The physical build is only one half of the equation for electric cars.
Tesla has established itself as a sexy company for the MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Stanford crowd to go for. Even if there's a reputation for stressful work environment and long hours, it doesn't stop them.
I see an extremely uphill battle for the old guard to convince this talent to work for them simply because they're nowhere near as sexy. The old guard still attracts mechanical engineers for sure, no question about that.
I mean there is existence proof that LIDAR is not needed to drive a car: humans seem to be able to drive just fine with just 2 cameras and stereo vision.
It's just a matter of the software, right? ;-)
How about not giving Tesla credit for every innovation in car industry? The MMI in Audi comes from a Finnish company that has been working on it since 2010.
The biggest problem for Tesla is that in five years most large car manufacturers will be deep in the electric game. I'm happy they helped change the industry, but this will be the biggest hurdle for them. When VW, BMW, Mercedes and Toyota are all selling electric cars in let's say, 2022, why would the customer choose Tesla at that point? Definitely not because of the design. I think their window is too small and the competition too strong for the long haul. Still love what a Tesla is doing but time will tell.
This was my point. Once the powertrain playing field is levelled, what have they got over other OEMs?
Credit where credit is due, they've pushed the industry forward. But I can see their position in the market shrinking rapidly in a few years, where my guess is that they'll shift focus onto the battery tech for third parties.
Honest question - have they even pushed the industry forward? Their volumes are low, other companies are already producing hybrid or full EV cars. The likes of the Prius, bolt, and Leaf get seemingly shat on, but they were doing this before Tesla.
Honest question - have they even pushed the industry forward? Their volumes are low, other companies are already producing hybrid or full EV cars. The likes of the Prius, bolt, and Leaf get seemingly shat on, but they were doing this before Tesla.
The Bolt (excluding leaf and Prius because their not in the same league) was first because its volumes are low and GM has no real public plan to manufacture it in larger numbers. They wouldn't even be able to get enough batteries for it. If any other manufacturer was serious about evs at this point we'd be hearing about more gigafactory type plans, but there aren't any yet and probably won't be any for a while. It wouldn't suprise me if Tesla had at least 3 gigafactories finished before the traditional automakers or their suppliers have one.Honest question - have they even pushed the industry forward? Their volumes are low, other companies are already producing hybrid or full EV cars. The likes of the Prius, bolt, and Leaf get seemingly shat on, but they were doing this before Tesla.
The Bolt (excluding leaf and Prius because their not in the same league) was first because its volumes are low and GM has no real public plan to manufacture it in larger numbers. They wouldn't even be able to get enough batteries for it. If any other manufacturer was serious about evs at this point we'd be hearing about more gigafactory type plans, but there aren't any yet and probably won't be any for a while.
The Bolt (excluding leaf and Prius because their not in the same league) was first because its volumes are low and GM has no real public plan to manufacture it in larger numbers. They wouldn't even be able to get enough batteries for it. If any other manufacturer was serious about evs at this point we'd be hearing about more gigafactory type plans, but there aren't any yet and probably won't be any for a while. It wouldn't suprise me if Tesla had at least 3 gigafactories finished before the traditional automakers or their suppliers have one.
What about the electric Golf? And the Hyundai Ionic? And what's wrong with the business model of the i3?They definitively moved the EV transition forward, even if the transition would have happened without them.
Germans manufacterer for example punched the phasing out of diesel motors several years sooner than planed (though dieselgate has helped too). More importantly, it convinced them that EVs are viable. Up till now, they sat on the technology without bringing them out.
The Leaf/Zoe is really the only other noteworthy EV, the i3 for example crashed and burned due to the wrong business model.
Elon's track record isn't great if you ask me. Solar City never looked like it was going to make money despite being in a good place at the right time. Similarly, hyper loop, boring company, Space X are all 'dream big' ideas that don't seem to be profit drivers.
The one difference with Tesla, is that its a retail product for the masses. At $35k for the base model, I don't think its overly expensive. I'm equating this to AU$50k, and I think most people who live in Australia wouldn't think this was expensive either. People just haven't had a car to justify dropping $50k before. For me, I'm totally happy driving a Mazda 3 for half the price of a BMW 320. But if there's a car that has no emissions, and does something positive for the environment, then as long as its a reasonable price, i'd pay for it.
What about the electric Golf? And the Hyundai Ionic? And what's wrong with the business model of the i3?
It's not clear if any Japanese or American companies are still interested in selling in the Chinese market, if they are they aren't acting like it. However the Germans in particular are moving aggressively to meet the terms of the Chinese mandate.