Sadly, I would be surprised if she didn't1
FORMER US Open champion Samantha Stosur has been snubbed by the Grand Slam, forced to catch a bus to the tournament and shunted between practice courts. The last woman to win the Grand Slam before Serena Williams had to catch a bus from Manhattan to Flushing Meadows when the tournament organisers told her they had no car available on Wednesday morning. The same day, Stosur was shunted between three practice courts over a 45 minute period — unable to secure a solid block of on court preparation — after she said world number one Serena Williams booted her off the first court.
The world No.22 was unaffected by the below par treatment, storming into her second round match this morning to claim victory against Russian Evgeniya Rodina in just 51 minutes, 6-1, 6-1. But later, Stosur said the treatment wasn’t good enough. “When you are still in the tournament you try and book a car and they say you can’t have one before 10am because you don’t have a match, I don’t think it’s good enough,” she said. When asked if she thought Williams — the only woman to win the US Open since Stosur did 2011 — would get a car, she replied: “Yeah”. “She kicked me off my practice court yesterday too. A few issues, but it’s all right,” she said. Stosur said she wasn’t speaking as a former champion, but was speaking for all players. “It’s not just me, there have been many players in that situation,” she said. “It’s a grand slam. It’s one of the biggest tournaments in the world. You’ve got to be able to provide transport to players when they need it,” she said.
The scoreboard during her first-round win over Timea Babos listed her as Samantha Stososova.
Murray is one match away from having the ATP record for most matches won from 0-2 down.
dem mindgames
5 setters are way too long, both for the player and viewer. They should do changeovers every 4 games maybe, the players can handle it; a 90 second sit down is small to begin with. At the same time, increase the time between points. It's ridiculous that they try to hurry things along and shorten matches by only allowing 20 seconds instead of 25.Honestly it makes sense that a player from this era should take the record for comebacks from two sets to love down. The men's (though also the women's to a lesser degree) has never been more physical, and a lot of players simply don't have the conditioning to compete for best 3 out of 5 at the level needed to beat the likes of Murray (unless they completely implode). It's a good part of the reason why very few talented teenagers can make breakthrough runs at Slams - they might have the technique and the game sense to succeed, but they don't usually have the physical strength or stamina. The elite players are also the best and most experienced at recovering from exhaustion in time for the next match.
Jon Wertheim, surely one of the best tennis writers around (and probably concensus pick for the best?) has been banging the drum for a rethink of best of 5 at the Slams, certainly during the first week. He brought it up again in his run down of day 4, pointing out the record number of men's retirements at this tournament. Personally, I think any change to the format would be sacrilege - the huge prize money more than makes up for the increase in difficulty. I would bet a lot of money that the AELTC would never accept it at Wimbledon. But I am much more sympathetic to fears about asking players to play in direct sunlight for hours, and would like to see as many matches as possible played in the mornings and at night. I wonder if shading off Louis Armstrong would be possible (like with Ashe). If it could get to the point where a player would never be asked to play during the middle of the day twice in a row that would be a big improvement.
Alternatively, speed up the damn courts so players can actually hit through the damn ball.
5 setters are way too long, both for the player and viewer. They should do changeovers every 4 games maybe, the players can handle it; a 90 second sit down is small to begin with. At the same time, increase the time between points. It's ridiculous that they try to hurry things along and shorten matches by only allowing 20 seconds instead of 25.
Agree with this strongly too. I think the 4 Slams should pull further apart, whereas over the past 15 years they've consistently moved closer together. Wimbledon, since the 2001 grass adjustments, and the USO with gradually more sand, have got continuously slower, to the point that big servers don't seem to have a large advantage on grass, and there's little difference between the USO and the AO's Plexicushion. Perversely, the French is faster than ever, to the point where there are very few (any?) clay court specialists capable of winning it, like Kuerten and Moya once did, and there's nearly as much net attacking at RG as Wimbledon!
That said, I don't think I could stomach watching Ivo Karlovic win a Grand Slam, so maybe I should be careful what I wish for.
Cilic has always been known for being a choker. But it seems he's fighting well today? He can close it in 4 if he wins this tiebreak.Cilic is such a mug sometimes. So mentally weak. Its a wonder how he won that title last year.
ah damn. this is probably over, what a shame.
Michael Russel is also retiring after this tournament. He's playing double with Dolan Young right now
watching djokovic play this year:
Djokovic 2015 = Nadal 2013watching djokovic play this year:
Bouchard-Cibulkova isn't bad, you can watch it instead.