Well, I must admit that I will be flipping back and forth due to the times alligning, even as an Iowa State fan.Well it is from one of the crazies
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427026/democratic-debates-timing-rigged-dnc-hillary-clinton
Well, I must admit that I will be flipping back and forth due to the times alligning, even as an Iowa State fan.Well it is from one of the crazies
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427026/democratic-debates-timing-rigged-dnc-hillary-clinton
It's not like she had a bad performance during the first debate. And coming off her strength during the Benghazi hearings, I don't think her campaign has a reason to become camera shy.
The change in tone definitely benefits her the most, imo.I'm excited to hear Hillary's answers on these things. She's a very good speaker and quite knowledgeable about this.
If there weren't any more debates she would win. She has the most name recognition and is the one to lose the nomination.
The less exposure the better for her.
Anecdotally, my opinion also became more favorable of her after the first debate.Just speaking as personal anecdote, but my opinion of Clinton actually improved after seeing her in the first debate, being somewhat lukewarm to her candidacy prior. But I understand that she's the one with the most to lose if something in these debates catches her off-guard.
I'm excited to hear Hillary's answers on these things. She's a very good speaker and quite knowledgeable about this.
Apparently, because of the tragic events in Paris the debate will be about terrorism.
I'm looking forward to it.
nytimes.com
Apparently, because of the tragic events in Paris the debate will be about terrorism.
I'm looking forward to it.
nytimes.com
Why wouldn't it?
Just speaking as personal anecdote, but my opinion of Clinton actually improved after seeing her in the first debate, being somewhat lukewarm to her candidacy prior. But I understand that she's the one with the most to lose if something in these debates catches her off-guard.
Don't believe hildogs lies. She's in the pocket of wallstreet and will do absolutely nothing to better the socioeconomic standing of the middle class. She also doesn't seem to understand or care about the weight of the proverbial race war occurring in America atm. Her stances are weak and her intentions are underwhelming. I wish Bill could run again
I'm making the next one. #HypeAfter the fine wine of the last debate thread that OP is straight doodoo
I'm thinking about it.Should've gone with the Star Wars theme, kitty.
That basically all but guarantees Hillary will dominate he debate.
Well it's true. Her plan essentially is to keep things the same expect be more obvious about it than Obama.
I'm sorry dude but I was a HUGE obama supporter and thought we'd have economic balance as well as universal Healthcare by now. But none of that has happened. He's spent too much time trying to appease the right and create bipartisanship when he should have simply proceeded with his policies without them. His initial proposals have been great but have never turned out like they should have. It's like he didn't realize he had the biggest weapon of all, the majority of the population.
Anyways, feel the damn bern and keep it moving.
Daniel B·;185474021 said:OMG, that's hilarious and 99% accurate too (I can at least concede her 1%) .
I'm looking forward to my local debate party, which looks like it might attract 20 (currently 17), which is a big drop from the 70 we had at the last debate, but not bad.
P.S. goodluck to anyone trying to find a Hillary party, as they seem to be practically non-existent.
Hillary is done. Low to non-existent debate parties have historically been a good indicator of a candidate's actual performance.
Hillary is done. Low to non-existent debate parties have historically been a good indicator of a candidate's actual performance.
Well it's true. Her plan essentially is to keep things the same expect be more obvious about it than Obama.
I'm sorry dude but I was a HUGE obama supporter and thought we'd have economic balance as well as universal Healthcare by now. But none of that has happened. He's spent too much time trying to appease the right and create bipartisanship when he should have simply proceeded with his policies without them. His initial proposals have been great but have never turned out like they should have. It's like he didn't realize he had the biggest weapon of all, the majority of the population.
Anyways, feel the damn bern and keep it moving.
Well it's true. Her plan essentially is to keep things the same expect be more obvious about it than Obama.
I'm sorry dude but I was a HUGE obama supporter and thought we'd have economic balance as well as universal Healthcare by now. But none of that has happened. He's spent too much time trying to appease the right and create bipartisanship when he should have simply proceeded with his policies without them. His initial proposals have been great but have never turned out like they should have. It's like he didn't realize he had the biggest weapon of all, the majority of the population.
Anyways, feel the damn bern and keep it moving.
That was never, ever going to happen. I mean...you set your expectations entirely too high. Should Bernie win (he won't get the nomination, and would be destroyed in the General if he did), you'll find that the Bern would be far less effective that 2009 Obama at getting things through Congress.
Wrong. Every poll out so far has Bernie beating the repubs at a higher margin than hillary.
Well it's true. Her plan essentially is to keep things the same expect be more obvious about it than Obama.
I'm sorry dude but I was a HUGE obama supporter and thought we'd have economic balance as well as universal Healthcare by now. But none of that has happened. He's spent too much time trying to appease the right and create bipartisanship when he should have simply proceeded with his policies without them. His initial proposals have been great but have never turned out like they should have. It's like he didn't realize he had the biggest weapon of all, the majority of the population.
Anyways, feel the damn bern and keep it moving.
We do have universal healthcare now. It's not single payer, but it's still universal healthcare and it lays the groundwork for single payer down the line -- groundwork that hadn't existed until five years ago.
Those polls are meaningless this far out. 2012 had polls saying Hermain Cain could beat Obama.
It gets more and more like Ron Paul every day.
Ah yes, this all powerful weapon that brought us a Republican House and a Republican Senate during Obama's two midterm elections.I'm sorry dude but I was a HUGE obama supporter and thought we'd have economic balance as well as universal Healthcare by now. But none of that has happened. He's spent too much time trying to appease the right and create bipartisanship when he should have simply proceeded with his policies without them. His initial proposals have been great but have never turned out like they should have. It's like he didn't realize he had the biggest weapon of all, the majority of the population.
Also bs. Why is it when a poll favors bernie it's "too soon" but when a poll favors Hillary it's just writing on the wall? Confirmation bias on Neogaf.
Awful OP.
There really wasn't as much build-up to this one. Oh well.
Tough break for Bernie. I don't think having this debate switch focus from the economy to foreign policy will do him any favors.
Daniel B·;185453105 said:The loss of the innocent lives in Paris (now 129, according to BBC), is a tragedy, that we, the United States, are in large part responsible, for creating the barbaric monster, that is the Islamic State, by deposing Sadam Hussein, the dictator that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, without a plan or the huge resources required to make Iraq a viable country, after the fact. Yes, there will be plenty to talk about on foreign policy, such as Bernie's stand against the second Iraq war, where he and others predicted the turmoil that would be unleashed, and the establishment war machine has a lot to answer for.Ohhhh, yes. HIllary knows her shit on foreign policy. Sanders...eh, not quite as much. A foreign policy debate should favor Hillary. She's already seen as better able to handle national security and foreign policy than Sanders by a decent margin in several polls I've read. The fact that they had to change it because of the violence in Paris...I just get so sick of all of us killing each other over nothing. It sickens and saddens me.
Hillary's op-ed How I Would Reaffirm Unbreakable Bond With Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu was not helpful, at all, with her saying "ld also invite the Israeli prime minister to the White House in my first month in office". A significant factor for the decades long tension, in the region, is our sometimes too cozy relationship with Israel, which, although Obama has achieved nothing on this front, I believe his heart was in the right place, but, with with Hillary, I see little distinction between her adoration for Netanyahu, and the Republicans, when Netanyahu's hardline stance is a big part of the problem. As Bernie has said, no one is talking about weakening the security of Israel, we just believe the Palestinian people have just as much of a right to live in peace and prosperity, with their own state.
Also bs. Why is it when a poll favors bernie it's "too soon" but when a poll favors Hillary it's just writing on the wall? Confirmation bias on Neogaf.
I'm saying the head to head polls are never accurate. I wouldn't trust the Clinton vs. Trump poll either, this has nothing to do with Sanders.
Traditional polling within the party is usually reliable.