![]()
Hail to the king, baby!
*bows to Raimi*
SM3 got the highest opening thanks to SM2 and blew it. What a shame.
![]()
Hail to the king, baby!
*bows to Raimi*
Batman Begins did suffer from that though even with an extra two year cushion.Yeah becuase Batman Forever and Batman & Robin totally destroyed the Batman brand. You guys act as if one bad film completely neglects two great films.
That is depressing. SM 1 and 3 being on top, that is.
Batman Begins did suffer from that though even with an extra two year cushion.
S-M2 set the table for S-M3. I don't think the hype to see a sequel to S-M1 was there, while putting Spider-man on screen for the first time it was obviously there. Then S-M2 easily ended up being the best in the series; an evolution of the first one, pretty much better in every way. So though it's opening numbers don't show it, I think it was the most important one in the franchise.
Anyway, ASM is cool, but you just can't do a remake this soon and go over similar stories. People don't want it. Especially with a greatly lesser score and not as specific of a feel. I do think there's slight carry over from S-M3 as well. The shittiness of that film really damaged the series.
So let's all wait for the spidy knight in 2 years!Batman Begins did suffer from that though even with an extra two year cushion.
If Spider-Man 2 opened on a Friday, it probably would have broke the opening weekend record with ease, it's just that it burned off $63 million worth of demand before it hit the weekend.
Dunno about that, I was actually wonder if this awful plot point was only there due to venom's inclusion - as in you needed a stronger motivation for spiderman to go crazy with the Symbiote.;pBingo. People are quick to use Venom as the scapegoat for the movie's problems, but that's ignoring that a lot of the more maligned story ideas in the film--Sandman being Ben's killer, Harry's amnesia, love triangles all around, Sandman getting away--were all Raimi's ideas. Venom may have been shoehorned into the film, but he was really just taking the place of Vulture (so the 3 villains issue would have still been an issue regardless).
If Spider-Man 2 opened on a Friday, it probably would have broke the opening weekend record with ease, it's just that it burned off $63 million worth of demand before it hit the weekend.
Batman Begins did suffer from that though even with an extra two year cushion.
Anyway, ASM is cool, but you just can't do a remake this soon and go over similar stories. People don't want it. Especially with a greatly lesser score and not as specific of a feel. I do think there's slight carry over from S-M3 as well. The shittiness of that film really damaged the series.
Shit. Forgot about that. Guess it may not have been as dramatic of a drop. I feel like if S-M3 was good, it definitely makes 400 million though, which would have left S-M2 as the only in the franchise to not hit that mark. I just think a movie's quality has a delayed affect on the franchise's strength a lot of times. It doesn't directly result in success for that movie, is what I mean to say.
That's debatable. It grossed higher then every Batman before it (besides the original Batman) despite not having a proven, box office lead (at the time) and directed by a then mostly indie director. But if Batman Begin's box office numbers were negatively affected, did the quality of previous entries have a play in that? Probably. But I would say the main negative stigmas attached to it had more to do with franchise fatigue, darker then usual tone for a comic movie, and genre fatigue with a bunch of shitty comic films (outside of Spiderman) released before it.
Outside of my example, SM3 was hardly enough to "burn" spiderman fans and damage the franchise completely. the franchise just saw two great films that propelled it to its highest popularity level in probably.... Ever.
Did you miss the part where they was a live broadcast on TV showing Spidey was injured .. and would not be able to get to the Oscorp tower in time.- Crane scene was just "okay", but how did they know he would need them?
- The lizard on paper was a good choice but the execution not so good. Was pretty annoyed as to how much his design looked terrible.
Maybe its just me, but I didn't feel Spidey had enough banter or witty dialogue.
- Didn't like how there wasn't enough info given about Peters parents.
Crane scene was just "okay", but how did they know he would need them?
You realize this is meant to be the first movie of a trilogy, right?
![]()
![]()
Compared to none in the Tobey movies, it was a lot.
You realize this is meant to be the first movie of a trilogy, right?
fucking hated it, webb and his shitty direction can go stuff it
Did you miss the part where they was a live broadcast on TV showing Spidey was injured .. and would not be able to get to the Oscorp tower in time.
Jeez, even explaining that sounds cheesy.
![]()
![]()
Compared to none in the Tobey movies, it was a lot.
You realize this is meant to be the first movie of a trilogy, right?
Because the guy whose son Spidey saved saw him on the TV having trouble swinging.
![]()
Hail to the king, baby!
*bows to Raimi*
That was easily the best feature of the new film.
lol, movie felt like it was directed by an incompetent robot.
![]()
THANK YOU SMART THINKING PEOPLE FOR NOT FALLING COMPLETELY FOR CORPORATE CHURNING MOVIE CRAP!
Now only for every Marvel Studios movie to completely bomb.
lol, it really didn't.
Thats Bob being Bob.
Thats Bob being Bob.
I hope they just abandon the parents plotline entirely in the sequels, I couldn't be anymore uninterested in that shit.
![]()
THANK YOU SMART THINKING PEOPLE FOR NOT FALLING COMPLETELY FOR CORPORATE CHURNING MOVIE CRAP!
Now only for every Marvel Studios movie to completely bomb.
One of the biggest problems this movie has that people can seemingly unanimously agree upon is tone inconsistency, that right there is a tell-tale sign of weak direction.lol, it really didn't.
Forreal, but it sadly looks like they're gonna push it further with the sequel.
1. why were actual lizards attracted(?) to Connors? was there any reason given in the movie? was there any reason for actual lizards to be IN the movie other than to just walk around sometimes?
2. why did Uncle Ben leave that strange phone message full of praise on Peter's phone when Peter forgot to pick up Aunt May and then act really mad once Peter got home?
3. how did spider man get in the car when the car thief was trying to steal it? did he drive up with the guy who owned it?
4. did spider man ever find the guy who killed Ben? cause i think that car thief was the last guy he checked and that guy didnt have the tattoo either. (i actually feel like i missed something here because they couldnt've just dropped that storyline.)
5. was Connors' ultimate plan () written by a 5 year old? such an unoriginal plot.turn everyone into a lizard
6.the antidote that spread across the city only cured the 5 cops that got turned, right?
7. why did spider man need cranes to get from one end of the city to the other when he travels from one end of the city to the other all the time without cranes lining up?
maybe the first time ive ever seen spider man see a building down a street and basically say, 'i just cant get there'...
the whole crane scene and the dad saving him when he missed was so cheesy that i actually died. someone in the theater had to revive me.
the relationship between peter and gwen was pretty good. the actors did well with those roles and actually made me feel something in the final scene between the two of them.
i liked all the web action and the way spider man moved in the two main fights with Lizard.
i liked when he set up a web in the sewers like a real spider... even though i dont know why he did it or what he was hoping to get out of it. what did Peter expect to happen there?
Connors/Lizard, as a character, was kind of a mess.
it felt way too long.
it was a fine movie. didnt hate it, didnt love it.
it would be pretty rad if a sequel deals with the green goblin / death of gwen stacy. that might actually be something.
One of the biggest problems this movie has that people can seemingly unanimously agree upon is tone inconsistency, that right there is a tell-tale sign of weak direction.
I don't even think Sony knew this was going to be a trilogy until a few weeks ago. Which is terrible because there were certain things in the trailer that hinted at some more information on Peter's parents. It wasn't anything that couldn't be expanded on in a sequel, but if Sony tries to stretch out this "Peter, you're not an accident, this was intentional" plot line to all three movies, it's going to end badly. It just sets up to some reveals that should have happened in this movie while using the other films to expand on Peter trying to learn more like why was his dad experimenting on him.
It was always planned to be a trilogy. They hired Orci and Kurtzman to write the sequel back in April, and set the release date for the second movie for May 2, 2014.
I thoughtAnyone notice the strong "parallel" between SM1 and ASM when.Connors is threatened with being fired, then tries the test material on himself out of desperation, turns into a freak monster, and hunts down the person who fires him and tries to kill him
It was like Deja Vu.
Kraven in a sequel would most certainly be about him coming to NYC after rumors of a giant Lizard. Him in ASM would've never worked with the tone, though. His character wouldn't have had a good footing in the origins bits like Conners.I think ASM missed out on a great opportunity by not introducingalong with The Lizard storyline. It could of lead to a great motive for him being the villain in the sequel withKraven. Since that didn't happen, I have a bit of an oddball villain-wish for the sequel. I would like to see the enforcers and chameleon teaming up, and I believe it could make for very interesting film with Webb's grittier version of Spidey. But, I don't think any director/producer will see them important/interesting enough to base a movie around.Spiderman showing him up and taking down The Lizard first
As for what I think of the teaser,. Which, personally, I think both films will be an absolute mess going by how much trouble this movie had in establishing anything worthwhile character-wise just with The Lizard.I believe it is hinting towards Doc Ock with the top hat, and potentially the start of a road that leads to the sinister six in the third film. I also think the second film will have Green Goblin as well, and will go through the whole Gwen Stacy infamous storyline along with introducing MJ
I was referencing the fact that news broke recently saying that Sony had mentioned in an official statement that there would be at least two more films. Twas a joke. Again, we all assumed as much.
Spider-Man 2.1 is on FX.
soogood
what do u mean 2.1 and what is this extended train scene