Sengakus have always been a part of the treaty. Japan pays billions for American bases and Japanese people (especially in Okinawa) bear the burden hosting American troops. Seems a bit unfair Japan has to bear that for decades and then America would not uphold its part of the deal (but the deal is mainly to stop a war anyways I'd say).
American monitors the bank I'm assuming because it's a threat to the American based WB and the current balance of power. Id say it has little to do with Japan.
As an aside, Abe's reinterpretation of the constitution is seen as a way to drag Japan into America's conflicts.
(Don't mean to imply that I'm for the post-war security alliance, just that an American revision of their "duty" in it seems unfair. It'd be different if they left Okinawa and gave back the 25% or so of the island they control. Perhaps this could be (or is?) its own thread though.)
この話題は日本語と関係がなかったが、私は上記の通りに考えております。
国際関係に関してもちろん様々な意見や考え方があると思います。私の意見は絶対に正しいと思いません。
疲れた。眠たい。
I made this post here because most of the news I'm reading is in Japanese and I'm trying to get a clear understanding of what's going on and see if I interpreted everything correctly.
The new agreement allows 自衛隊 to attack even in circumstances outside of self defense and allows 自衛隊 to move about freely. If I read correctly, Japan couldn't attack without being attacked first, but now that stipulation has been removed.
This allows Japan to attack when America is attacked but does it also allow Japan to attack first.
"しかし、これまで東アジアと太平洋にとどまっていた日本の自衛隊の後方支援の範囲が全世界に広がり、日本が直接攻撃を受けなくても武力行使をすることができるようになった点など"
And if I remember correctly, at the recent conference where Abe made his speech,
there seemed to be tension between him and the Chinese international relations diplomat regarding 尖閣諸島 and AAIB. Abe said he's not happy with AAIB and he needs them to be more transparent or something along those lines. And I think it was during this same conference that a Chinese official said that those islands belong to China (It could have been a different conference though).
"【北京=川越一】中国外務省の洪磊報道官は28日の定例記者会見で、日米が防衛協力のための指針(ガイドライン)の再改定で合意したことについて、「日米同盟は中国を含む第三国の利益を損なわないよう保証するべきだ」と述べ、中国の海洋進出を警戒する日米を牽制(けんせい)した。
 洪報道官は、米側が新たなガイドラインを発表する前に、中国側に通告してきたことを明らかにした上で、尖閣諸島(沖縄県石垣市)をめぐる問題について「厳正な立場」を米側に伝えたと強調。「いかなる者が何と言おうと、何をしようと、(同諸島が)中国に属するという事実は変わらない」と従来の主張を繰り返した。"
If I'm understanding this carefully, America gave Chinese a heads up before they officially announced the pact and Obama also treaded carefully in his speech when talking about the checks toward IAAB. Abe doesn't seem to be treading as carefully, or maybe that's just my misunderstanding.
Thanks!