plasmawave
Banned
I thought it was blue and gold.
Fuck, you just broke my eyes.Here:
That was done with just one simple overall correction. I didn't make any selections to certain parts of the image.
Same here, but I was standing outside of the train and then looked back inside of the train. I think it has to do with background lighting. (bright outdoors, dark interior)When I first loaded this on my phone about 30 mins ago it was white/gold, now on my desktop it's blue/black
I have never honestly seen blue and black.
Occasionally when I scroll up and look at the bottom of the dress I can think "I see how you'd maybe sort of see it that way...?" but no, it does not stick in any way. The gold is so gold that I could never in a million years think it's black... it doesn't matter how it relates to other colors.
I don't agree with izunadono's theory that we all will see it in either way eventually.
It is absolutely the fact that humans see different colors from one another. Check out the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishihara_Test for an example of how this is true.
So rather, I think this dress shot has unintentionally danced on the line between different people's color perception. Is there some "color context" at play that causes some to see it as one or the other in varying circumstances? Sure. But I believe that there is also the fact that certain people are incapable of seeing one color combination or another.
With this dress, some will see it as white-gold only, some will see it as black-blue only, some will flip back and forth.
So all white/gold camp will eventually start seeing blue/black. But no blue/black will see it as white/gold.
They always make a post like this before it changes![]()
I have never honestly seen blue and black.
Occasionally when I scroll up and look at the bottom of the dress I can think "I see how you'd maybe sort of see it that way...?" but no, it does not stick in any way. The gold is so gold that I could never in a million years think it's black... it doesn't matter how it relates to other colors.
I don't agree with izunadono's theory that we all will see it in either way eventually.
It is absolutely the fact that humans see different colors from one another. Check out the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishihara_Test for an example of how this is true.
So rather, I think this dress shot has unintentionally danced on the line between different people's color perception. Is there some "color context" at play that causes some to see it as one or the other in varying circumstances? Sure. But I believe that there is also the fact that certain people are incapable of seeing one color combination or another.
With this dress, some will see it as white-gold only, some will see it as black-blue only, some will flip back and forth.
Me said:edit: Additionally, according to how my brain works, your left image seems unrealistic to me, because I have a hard time imagining a black surface or fabric reflecting that much golden light, whereas it's much easier for me to believe that a white fabric is giving off some blue radiosity or is simply under a shadow.
No, thats the only part of the dress thats not black, because light is shining on it. When you look at the entire picture and see black/blue, that part has a golden tint due to the light.I realize I'm probably not the first person to do this, but...
Without the context of the photo, does this honestly appear black to black-bluers?
![]()
I realize I'm probably not the first person to do this, but...
Without the context of the photo, does this honestly appear black to black-bluers?
![]()
I realize I'm probably not the first person to do this, but...
Without the context of the photo, does this honestly appear black to black-bluers?
![]()
There are over 2000 replies in this thread.
IT'S GOLD.
It's gold.
I still only see white and gold.
I guess my eyes are fucked.
I want to know what this really means for color differentiation.
For all we know, people who can only see white-gold and whose minds refuse to budge might actually have a color accuracy superiority?
Or maybe not, and it's the black-bluers? or is it the flip-floppers?
Or is color detection superiority subjective?
Some optician nerd is going to have a field day writing a paper on all this...
I want to know what this really means for color differentiation.
For all we know, people who can only see white-gold and whose minds refuse to budge might actually have a color accuracy superiority?
Or maybe not, and it's the black-bluers? or is it the flip-floppers?
Or is color detection superiority subjective?
Some optician nerd is going to have a field day writing a paper on all this...
I think it's interesting that everyone looks from the top down when pointing out the colors especially for the gold/black. If you look at the bottom of the photo where there is less exposure you see more black than gold. Also look to the left of the photo you see some black and white cloth, probably another dress and you can compare the black.
![]()
It doesn't on people who see blue and black. It looks goldish to them. But the bottom of the photo will look very blue and black, with few bits of it being brown.
When you look at the pixels, we all see it accurately.
For example, how can you see the blue as white? It's irrelevant to what people are seeing when they complain.
It's white and gold now
![]()
Yes, it looks "blue".. But even outside of context I think it looks like it could reasonably be shadowed white.
Clearly black/blue.