effzee said:ok cool so its activated meaning....?
I believe you did your job with those coordinates. It switches to that pixel over to The Joker's underneath. It's how mine was too after I submitted.
effzee said:ok cool so its activated meaning....?
also any word on when the trailer/teaser is supposed to be released?
any movie that its being attached to?
effzee said:yeah i guess more likely with a Warner Bros production.
btw how long have they been shooting for? 2 months? they already have enough for a trailer?
effzee said:yeah i guess more likely with a Warner Bros production.
btw how long have they been shooting for? 2 months? they already have enough for a trailer?
Spike Spiegel said:Now... I wanna see that face smile. Ledger's freakishly large grin + that makeup and those scars =![]()
John Dunbar said:Sorry if this has been mentioned already, but will the new Batman films have that female jester thingy with the red and black outfit as Joker's sidekick? I forget her name.
John Dunbar said:Sorry if this has been mentioned already, but will the new Batman films have that female jester thingy with the red and black outfit as Joker's sidekick? I forget her name.
BrandNew said:So can we surmise that only half of his face is scarred? It looks that way to me. On the right half it looks pretty normal and painted, but the left is all ****ed up and mutilated.
karasu said:LAME
karasu said:LAME
karasu said:Yeah, disliking the look of a villain in a ****ing Batman movie definitely determines if I'm a loser or not.:lol Get a grip Francis.
karasu said:Yeah, disliking the look of a villain in a ****ing Batman movie definitely determines if I'm a loser or not.:lol Get a grip Francis.
rikichi said:dont get offended karasu....just GTFO of this thread immediately before everyone calls you a loser.
karasu said:I'm not offended, I think it's funny. its not surprising considering people conditioned themselves into loving every little piece of whatever they saw before the movies' title was even released.
rkenshin said:So I take it you're always on the negative side of things 24/7?
Matrix said:Not a shocking response coming from you.
karasu said::lol for ****s sake. Disliking the look of the joker is not a statement on who I am. It simply means I dislike the look of the Joker.
Let them complain. They'll bitch about things until they're blue in the face and there's nothing you can do to make them intelligent.karasu said::lol for ****s sake. Disliking the look of the joker is not a statement on who I am. It simply means I dislike the look of the Joker. There's no need to search for an excuse to brush my opinion to the side. You can ignore it just because it's nothing more than another opinion.
I was right about Superman, and you know it.
karasu said:Yeah, disliking the look of a villain in a ****ing Batman movie definitely determines if I'm a loser or not.:lol Get a grip Francis.
karasu said:I'm not offended, I think it's funny. its not surprising considering people conditioned themselves into loving every little piece of whatever they saw before the movies' title was even released.
karasu said:I was right about Superman, and you know it.
J2 Cool said:Yes, but there's also people conditioned to dislike the look before even a glimpse is shown. And considering how little you actually thought of Joker to begin with, "The Joker is a loud/goofy guy in a loud/goofy purple suit.", I'm not suprised you're not going to like a Joker aimed at a very different audience.
starchild excalibur said:And having a devil may cry avatar definitely counteracts other people's claims as well, I'm sure.
I'm not batman fanboy (I didn't even get into Begins too much), but what's the point of posting shit in a thread that adds nothing but vitriol?
Yes, but there's also people conditioned to dislike the look. And considering how little you actually thought of Joker to begin with, "The Joker is a loud/goofy guy in a loud/goofy purple suit.", I'm not suprised you're not going to like a Joker aimed at a very different audience.
jett said:
I agree one thousand percent. Just imagine if they'd have let him get away with killing. (They kinda did in Return of the Joker). And J2 Cool, that unveiling seems more like something the Riddler would do.Ether_Snake said:The animated series had the best Joker ever.
J2 Cool said:![]()
![]()
Looks like a bit of influence was taken from the first Joker appearance. The dark eyes namely. Probably a black/greenish hair instead of cartoony green. Interesting comparison.
"The most interesting thing about the Joker for me was always the mystery that surrounded the character. He is a bit like Hannibal Lector in the sense that it isn't so important in SILENCE OF THE LAMBS to know where he came from. It's what he IS that makes the character amazing. In many respects, The Joker is a serial killer. His profile fits perfectly and I'm really hoping that Nolan and Goyer play him more as such instead of going for the over the top, comedic opportunities they approached the Joker with in the 1989 BATMAN.
Visually, I like the idea of the character being played a lot darker and more disturbing as well. It's difficult to realistically explain why the guy would have a huge grin on his face all the time. This is why I came up with the idea to actually scar his face to mirror the Joker smile. I remember seeing some police photos of the Black Dhalia and being genuinely disturbed by how her face was cut to look like a killer smile. After all, if this character was truly a crazy maniac why wouldn't he do this to himself? Add a little smeared lipstick, white face paint, and purple eye-shadow and you have yourself one demented looking dude. I also gave him some scarring around the eyes to mirror clown makeup a little more. I don't know about you, but clowns have always been a bit scary to me (the John Wayne Gacey angle doesn't help). As far as clothing, maybe push the character a little more in the Tyler Durden direction. Give him a wardrobe that could be a little over the top but not look completely fabricated and silly."
Batmanuel! I need to go watch that show again.DMczaf said: