The Dark Knight Rises Unsafe (?) Hype Thread |5 Spoiled, 2 Of Them Mods!|

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is nothing natural about a fifteen minute intermission. Everybody starts talking about what they think of the movie so far, what they like and don't like while it's still got more than an hour left. It's like premiering a blockbuster on GAF.



That's actually pretty cool, it's like watching an opera in the early 1900's.
 
I'd take 3 hours, but I still think that's overshooting what the actual running time will be. Even if that guy's legitimate, it's still a second hand report from his wife who's just giving a general estimate.
 
I'd take 3 hours, but I still think that's overshooting what the actual running time will be. Even if that guy's legitimate, it's still a second hand report from his wife who's just giving a general estimate.

Yeah I am going to say pretty safe estimate is around 3 hours but closer to 2.5 or 2.75 hours.

EDIT: Of course I'll take 3 hours if thats true!
 
hq27T.jpg
 
There is nothing natural about a fifteen minute intermission. Everybody starts talking about what they think of the movie so far, what they like and don't like while it's still got more than an hour left. It's like premiering a blockbuster on GAF.


Yeah, even as someone who has to piss every ten minutes, fuck intermissions. Nothing like a nice break to take everyone out of the movie.


I'm so happy it's long. Gonna be so sad when it's over.


Same. Nothing wrong with three hours as long as it's all good. Dark Knight rushed to it's ending, so I'm okay with this. Especially for the last installment. Just don't give me five 10 minute endings like Return of the King.
 
only intermission i liked was when i seen "Kill Bill: the whole bloody affair" it felt very natural and didnt end like kill bill 1. felt like a true transition.

but of course WBA is 247 minutes long.
 
Yeah, even as someone who has to piss every ten minutes, fuck intermissions. Nothing like a nice break to take everyone out of the movie.





Same. Nothing wrong with three hours as long as it's all good. Dark Knight rushed to it's ending, so I'm okay with this. Especially for the last installment. Just don't give me five 10 minute endings like Return of the King.

I wouldn't have Return of the King end any other way. Return of the King needed that half an hour of closure after 12 hours of no resolution. Shortchanging a bunch of character to try to stick to one characters' ending would have been shitty.
 
I wouldn't have Return of the King end any other way. Return of the King needed that half an hour of closure after 12 hours of no resolution. Shortchanging a bunch of character to try to stick to one characters' ending would have been shitty.

You have no idea how bad I had to piss. It was fucking torture.

"Alright, we're done!"

30 minutes later...
 
Still would see it in film imax, maybe there is a natural break point through it? Didn't titanic have an intermission, where did it stop at?
 
I don't see TDKR going over the IMAX limit. Maybe it'll have to have shorter credits in IMAX like Avatar did, but I think they're doing everything they can to get it under 166 minutes.
 
Heh, you're so careful not to cross any wires with 3D.

Not at all, you're just missing the entire point of that argument.

The switch to colour, widescreen and 3D etc are all motivated by a means of showcasing greater immersive qualities in the cinema.

Texting and intermissions contradict this motivation as they serve only to break that immersive quality and pull viewers out of the film's world.

How exactly do intermissions enhance your connection to a film? How does staring at a bright phone screen, rather than the movie screen make for a more visceral engagement with the screen you're now ignoring?
 
I don't believe this is 3+ hours long. I'd be down, and it would be awesome, but I think Nolan aims for a very specific sweet spot. Some people think his other movies are long enough as it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom