beelzebozo
Jealous Bastard
SpeedingUptoStop said:Outside of the hair, that's pretty awesome.
feather back matted hair for style.
SpeedingUptoStop said:Outside of the hair, that's pretty awesome.
Based on conversations with industry insiders as well as the apparent schedule for INCEPTION (preproduction, shooting, and postproduction), its starting to look like BATMAN 3 is going to end up being a Summer 2012 release.
I know a four year gap is a bummer, but cheer up -- at least we know a Nolan-directed BATMAN 3 is coming!
Dec. 12, 2012. The movie will come out in the summer. We're fine!SpeedingUptoStop said:just as long as it's released before the apocalypse, we're cool.
If it's release causes the apocalypse, I'll accept that too.
:lol Well that statement doesn't hold up.critch said:Not to mention that it's clear to everyone except internet assholes that he's hit Watchmen out of the park.
No, Guzim, in order to shoot for the Academy Awards & captivate audience around the world amidst the winter doldrums, it will be pushed back to Dec. 12. Christian Bale will then promptly turn on the LHC and save us all from imminent doom. He will subsequently win the oscar for Best Actor to Ever Save the Universe and PhoenixDark will cry for his sins.Guzim said:Dec. 12, 2012. The movie will come out in the summer. We're fine!
Solo said:Aren't Spider-Man 4 and 5 out summer 2010 and 2011 respectively? Wouldnt surprise me if this factors into a 2012 release for the next film.
Solo said:Aren't Spider-Man 4 and 5 out summer 2010 and 2011 respectively? Wouldnt surprise me if this factors into a 2012 release for the next film.
Solo said:Aren't Spider-Man 4 and 5 out summer 2010 and 2011 respectively? Wouldnt surprise me if this factors into a 2012 release for the next film.
jett said:Lulz Bale is gonna be like 40 when Batman 3 comes out.
Personally I think Christopher Nolan could invest his time in better stuff than yet another comic book movie.
Ninja Scooter said:was done worse a few months ago:
Buckethead said:Sure, it's an ironic parody on the shittily designed Obama "Hope" poster.
One is original work, the other is a photoshop filter.
Ninja Scooter said:uhm, the other is also supposed to be a parody of the Obama posters, only it looks like it was drawn by some 2nd rate Image comics artist from 1992.
Buckethead said:The original Obama poster is virtually a trace of an actual photograph by hack 'artist' Shepard Fairley.
So then someone took a picture of the Joker, opened up Photoshop, and went
Filters >> Cutout, messed with the colors a bit and viola, crappy art.
It's a trace of a trace.
Whereas that one, while not as hipstery, actually took time, effort, and talent.
Point is: whether you like it or not....someone took time to make it, considerable moreso than the one you posted, and you were ragging on it. Dick move.
RBelong2Us said:I'm surprised WB wouldnt do everything in their power to make sure at most it takes 3yrs for the third to get released.....you dont want a sequel to a movie that made a billion dollars to take 4 years.
As a fan I'm totally fine with it, I know Nolan and co. are going to put out quality...dont need to rush them.
In August, I had a meeting with a producer who has had some experience producing Batman movies. The Dark Knight was still the number one movie in theaters that day, and conversation naturally turned to it.
ME: So -- The Dark Knight.
PRODUCER: I know.
ME: Right?
PRODUCER: I know. It's amazing. I know.
ME: So. You tell me. You make this kind of movie. You tell me. How?
PRODUCER: How what?
ME: How does a movie like that get made? In this environment, where anything complicated or challenging or pessimistic or visionary get ironed out to appeal to the broadest possible market, how does a movie like that get made? That's an expensive movie with a lot of moving parts -- the producers, the cast, the special effects, the location shooting -- how does a picture like that get made, and end up that good?
PRODUCER: Because Christopher Nolan gets no notes.
(pause)
ME: What do you mean?
PRODUCER: I mean, the studio gives him no notes. None. Zero.
ME: The director gets no notes?
PRODUCER: None.
ME: So, you're telling me, Christopher Nolan and his brother write the script --
PRODUCER: And then they shoot it. And the studio gives them no notes. They've given them the project, they trust their vision, and they let them shoot it the way they want. And that's how a movie like that gets made.
More proof Nolan am God. Christopher Nolan is our world's Doctor Manhattan.DMczaf said:
damnDMczaf said:
Buckethead said:Point is: whether you like it or not....someone took time to make it, considerable moreso than the one you posted, and you were ragging on it. Dick move.
Wow, that's surprising with just a few films under his belt.DMczaf said:
Well I'm going to be hard to be around for the next 3 years.DMczaf said:Looks like Batman 3 will be 2012 instead of 2011.
That script better be GOLD, Jonah!
http://www.batman-on-film.com/BATMAN-3_B3-in-2012_3-6-09.html
![]()
![]()
DMczaf said:
Ninja Scooter said:Uwe Boll takes time to make his movies and we rag on them. Who gives a shit?
SpeedingUptoStop said:More proof Nolan am God. Christopher Nolan is our world's Doctor Manhattan.
jett said:Chris Nolan FTW. Seems WB is treating him the way they treated Stanley Kubrick.
DMczaf said:
Solo said:Well, his last film did gross $530M - of course hes going to get the keys to the castle for the foreseeable future.
Duderz said:I wish nobody would work with FOX.
AlternativeUlster said:Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh..........................do you remember Eyes Wide Shut?
Rabid Wolverine said:http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,28383,25158650-7485,00.html
Sam Worthington as Batman? I don't see it.
Id rather have a crazy Bale.
Rabid Wolverine said:http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,28383,25158650-7485,00.html
Sam Worthington as Batman? I don't see it.
Id rather have a crazy Bale.
DMczaf said:Australian paper spreading a rumor about an Australian actor getting the role of Batman? :lol
Nolan gave you guys Ledger, you all need to calm the fuck down down there!
Extollere said:Why would Bale be replaced...he has stated that he will continue to be Batman (by his contract) as long as Nolan stays on as director. Nolan also likes Bale and given that the studio is letting him do what he wants I can't see this changing unless there is a serious fallout or something.
Bale is a great Batman though, if he could control his over emotive Bat-voice he'd be even better.
Distributor Warner Bros. has hung up the cowl and cape for The Dark Knight after 231 days of service. With a $533.3 million final tally as of Mar. 5, the picture is the top superhero or comic book movie of all time.
The Dark Knight stands as the most attended movie since Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace in 1999, ranking 27th on the All Time Adjusted for Ticket Price Inflation chart. Unadjusted, writer-director Christopher Nolan' Batman sequel is second only to Titanic, and its phenomenal 33-week run includes $49.9 million from IMAX venues, a record for a two-dimensional re-mastered IMAX release.