Not everyone will remember, but it was a huge story at the time. Three Duke lacrosse players were accused of rape at a party. Things were *very* heated in the national discourse back then. Even after the charges were dropped and the young men won a major lawsuit, she maintained that it happened, until now.
en.m.wikipedia.org
—————
The
Duke lacrosse case was a widely reported 2006 criminal case in
Durham,
North Carolina, United States, in which three members of the
Duke University men's lacrosse team were
falsely accused of rape.
[1][2][3] The three students were David Evans, Collin Finnerty, and Reade Seligmann. The accuser was
Crystal Mangum, a student at
North Carolina Central University[4][1] who worked part-time as a
strip tease dancer.
[5] She alleged that the rape occurred at a party hosted by the lacrosse team, held at the Durham residence of two of the team's
captains, and where she had worked on March 13, 2006.
Investigation and resolution of the case sparked public discussion of racism,
sexual violence,
media bias, and
due process on campuses. The former lead
prosecutor,
Durham County District AttorneyMike Nifong, ultimately resigned in disgrace, and was
disbarred and briefly imprisoned for violating ethics standards.
On April 11, 2007,
North Carolina Attorney GeneralRoy Cooper dropped all charges, declaring the three lacrosse players "innocent" and victims of a "tragic rush to accuse".
[6][7]
Cooper described Nifong as a "rogue prosecutor"; the district attorney withdrew from the case in January 2007 after the
North Carolina State Barfiled ethics charges against him. In June 2007, Nifong was disbarred for "dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation", making him the first prosecutor in North Carolina disbarred for trial conduct. Nifong served one day in jail for lying about sharing
DNA tests (
criminal contempt); he had not given results to the defense team. The lab director said it was a misunderstanding and Nifong claimed it was due to weak memory.
[8]
While DNA analysis did not show evidence from any of the men she accused, Mangum continued to insist she was sexually assaulted that night. She was not charged for her allegations.
[9]
Cooper noted several inconsistencies between Mangum's accounts of the evening and the
alibisoffered by Seligmann and Finnerty, which were supported by forensic evidence. The
Durham Police Department was strongly criticized for violating their own policies by allowing Nifong to act as the
de facto head of the investigation; using an unreliable suspect-only photo identification procedure with Mangum; pursuing the case despite vast discrepancies in notes taken by Investigator Benjamin Himan and Sgt. Mark Gottlieb; and distributing a poster that appeared to presume the suspects' guilt shortly after the allegations were made public.
[10]
Seligmann, Finnerty, and Evans brought a civil lawsuit against
Duke University, which was settled. The university paid approximately $20 million to each claimant. The claimants also sought further unspecified
damages and called for criminal justice reform laws in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed against the City of Durham and its police department.
[10]
—————
