Frozenprince
Banned
"unfortunate outdated imagery" is code wordy as FUCK.
Whaaaaaat? Nooooooo. Nothing about any European tradition less than a century or so old involving could be racist Slay. Come on now. They're just traditions. Traditions that require blackface to survive.Amazing you can throw a dart at a globe and find some racist imagery of black people. Like there was some worldwide conspiracy to dehumanize us
I'm not sure why you're more annoyed by protests than the racism of the tradition.
I think this research mostly shows that the kinderombudsman has too much time on her hands. Why not concentrate on more important problems like child brides being brought in by migrants or young Islamic girls being send abroad to get their genitals mutilated?
Violence should piss you off absolutely when black people are beaten up by police for peacefully protesting against Zwarte Piet.Violence definitely pisses me more off than a non-violent 200 year old tradition. But that might just be me.
While it's true most Dutch people never really associate Zwarte Piet with racial questions, because Zwarte Piet in their eyes is not a black character, but rather simply a character who happens to be black, we only got there through some major tunnel vision. And the whole victim complex of suddenly these identity politics knobs turn it into something racist is simply a lie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIc715Md_MU
In the eighties, big bird already acts like a racist around Gerda Havertong, who explains that Sinterklaas is not considered a feast by many black Dutch people. Proving once again big bird is a fucking nazi, but also the insensitivity of Dutch people for the subject already thirty years ago.
And they did at times introduce more overt racist elements like zwarte Piet being a funny talking goof. Until a few years later they figured no wait that's actually racist, but refraining from looking at the similar minstrel show visual embellishments that are still present.
While I agree most people who Stan for Zwarte Piet are not actual racists and calling them that could slow down change, we also shouldn't absolve them as they dig into the feeling they have a right to be racist. We all agree the solution is simple, take away the fat lips and earrings and just focus on a soot Piets, yet why is it taking so long?
Yeah, I don't understand what some people are so defensive about. This is obviously about the red-lipped, talking-with-accent, curly haired, wearing-large-golden-earrings, type of Piet, which has definitely been very pervasive over the years.While I agree most people who Stan for Zwarte Piet are not actual racists and calling them that could slow down change, we also shouldn't absolve them as they dig into the feeling they have a right to be racist. We all agree the solution is simple, take away the fat lips and earrings and just focus on a soot Piets, yet why is it taking so long?
This is why I prefer the term casual racism for this, takes the sting off a bit and is more accurate. It's inherent in Dutch culture to be casually racist about tons of things, just think back on all the inherently racist jokes Dutch people tell. They don't even recognise they're doing it. Jokes about Chinese names, and such.
And in social situations, it's very common to make a joke at the expense of others in The Netherlands, we love to go straight for the jugular with friends, hit them in their weak spots. Anyone with Black or Asian friends in their group knows there's no taboo on teasing them about their race in one way or another. Most of the times, I reckon most Dutch people don't even realise for a second they do it. As I said, it's something that doesn't just happen with black people. Have a religious person in your group? He's gonna get teased about it. Fat person? Fair game. Gay guy? Oh myyyy. List goes on.
It's ingrained in Dutch culture and it's gonna take a long while for everyone to catch on and realise what they're doing and how it affects minorities. They simply don't recognise it, most will deny it at first. I know it took me a while to figure out what I was doing and how much a part of daily life it is in our culture. You grow up with it, you know?
European? Really? C'mon dude, get that chip off your shoulder and think about what you're actually saying.Whaaaaaat? Nooooooo. Nothing about any European tradition less than a century or so old involving could be racist Slay. Come on now. They're just traditions. Traditions that require blackface to survive.
This is why I prefer the term casual racism for this, takes the sting off a bit and is more accurate. It's inherent in Dutch culture to be casually racist about tons of things, just think back on all the inherently racist jokes Dutch people tell. They don't even recognise they're doing it. Jokes about Chinese names, and such.
And in social situations, it's very common to make a joke at the expense of others in The Netherlands, we love to go straight for the jugular with friends, hit them in their weak spots. Anyone with Black or Asian friends in their group knows there's no taboo on teasing them about their race in one way or another. Most of the times, I reckon most Dutch people don't even realise for a second they do it. As I said, it's something that doesn't just happen with black people. Have a religious person in your group? He's gonna get teased about it. Fat person? Fair game. Gay guy? Oh myyyy. List goes on.
It's ingrained in Dutch culture and it's gonna take a long while for everyone to catch on and realise what they're doing and how it affects minorities. They simply don't recognise it, most will deny it at first. I know it took me a while to figure out what I was doing and how much a part of daily life it is in our culture. You grow up with it, you know?
You mean that guy that misbehaved during the arrival of Sinterklaas in 2014?Violence should piss you off absolutely when black people are beaten up by police for peacefully protesting against Zwarte Piet.
Gives a new meaning to "going Dutch".
Violence should piss you off absolutely when black people are beaten up by police for peacefully protesting against Zwarte Piet.
Nobody is safe within the context of Dutch humor.
And they shouldn't, to be fair. I'm not Dutch, but between me and my nearest friends, there's always a banter running. I'd never offend someone I didn't know, but between friends almost everything is fair game.
The quicker they finally change this, the better. This holiday is aimed at kids, and kids don't care about the appearance of the Piets. However, it's the adults who have a hard time accepting changing this tradition rooted in slavery. I don't understand.
Maybe don't characterize black children. Maybe that's a start. Just let the children be children to one another not "but Lucy is different thus she must be mocked"I just hope everybody agrees that the big red lips, the earrings and the hair has to go.
I really wish I could see inside peoples head, because for me it is impossible to understand how people feel when they are called Zwarte Piet. Do people think it is enough after the racist blackface elements I mentioned before are removed? Will there still be negative thoughts when they are identified with a children's symbol kids adore?
Maybe don't characterize black children. Maybe that's a start. Just let the children be children to one another not "but Lucy is different thus she must be mocked"
Okay, point of order:
Gold earrings are a black stereotype now?
Okay, point of order:
Gold earrings are a black stereotype now?
While it's true most Dutch people never really associate Zwarte Piet with racial questions, because Zwarte Piet in their eyes is not a black character, but rather simply a character who happens to be black, we only got there through some major tunnel vision. And the whole victim complex of suddenly these identity politics knobs turn it into something racist is simply a lie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIc715Md_MU
In the eighties, big bird already acts like a racist around Gerda Havertong, who explains that Sinterklaas is not considered a feast by many black Dutch people. Proving once again big bird is a fucking nazi, but also the insensitivity of Dutch people for the subject already thirty years ago.
They are regarding "Zwarte Piet". Maybe not all of them. But I can understand that there are black women in The Netherlands that are afraid to put on big golden earRINGS around the Sinterklaas period. Especially man.
Two huge golden rings?
Yeah kind of...especially considering the context:
Spot the similarities between this old ass comic and Zwarte Piet:
![]()
I think this research mostly shows that the kinderombudsman has too much time on her hands. Why not concentrate on more important problems like child brides being brought in by migrants or young Islamic girls being send abroad to get their genitals mutilated?
She even acknowledged that her research, while giving a indication of the general sentiment, is not scientific proof and shouldnt be treated as such. How many children did she ask? How were the questions formulated? What schools in which parts of the country did she visit?
I think Zwarte Piet is a safe topic to get free publicity. You write something about changing Zwarte Piet, get dead threats online from the stupid part of the population and get invited to lots of talk shows (well, two actually). Rinse, repeat.
Huh, that's legit news to me. Curly hair and big red lips, sure, but I'd never heard of the earrings thing.
There are many examples of this taking place. It has been covered by the media, actually been properly researched and even discussed in our parliament. So I would hardly call it racist stereotypes.Defending racist stereotypes by deflecting using racist stereotypes.
Welp.
just like the sweets we used to call "Negerzoenen". That name being banned got a lot of resistence, but as soon as it was actually erased from the stores, nobody gave a shit anymore.
Oh, we're just going to conveniently forget Dutch colonialism's slavery in Dutch colonies was a thing until 1863, way after Britain and France. Just because it didn't happen on home soil, the Dutch can just wipe their hands clean of their history.I don't think zwarte piet is a tradition rooted in slavery tbh. Slavery was never legal in the Netherlands. But it shouldn't matter.
Rushing to change or end the racist elements of a cultural tradition is going to cause racism...yeah, then I think we need to rush it and let racists lose their power ASAP. Also, they've been "rushing" it for decades and there has been little budging.There are many examples of this taking place. It has been covered by the media, actually been properly researched and even discussed in our parliament. So I would hardly call it racist stereotypes.
But Sinterklaas is a very safe topic to get upset about. Be it Zwarte Piet or the gender stereotypes in advertisement for childrens toy. Nobody who disagrees with you is going to cut your head off.
Also, most people in this topic, and in The Netherlands, agree that Zwarte Piet has to change, to modernize. What we are disagreeing about is the pace and reasons for these changes. I dont see the need to rush this through a law. Just because a couple of professional protesters are offended, or people from a country with actual huge racial tension project their views about racism on The Netherlands.
I am worried that rushing this proces will only increase actual racism and the popularity of extreme right wing parties, because many Dutch people will feel we are again giving up part of our culture to foreigners.
I'm not wiping anything. I'm saying the story of zwarte piet originated on the main country, where slavery was never allowed. Slavery happened (and it definitely happened an awful lot) outside of the public's eye, a literal world away in a time without mass communication. So it doesn't make sense for it to be rooted in slavery, when there was no slavery at its roots. Modern day zwarte piet (not its progenitor) started out as a paid servant, because as I said, slavery was never allowed. Now the caricature features that were introduced around 1930(?), that may have a history in slavery, or at least in the kind of perception that made slavery possible to continue on for so long.Oh, we're just going to conveniently forget Dutch colonialism's slavery in Dutch colonies was a thing until 1863, way after Britain and France. Just because it didn't happen on home soil, the Dutch can just wipe their hands clean of their history.
Yeah, I don't understand what some people are so defensive about. This is obviously about the red-lipped, talking-with-accent, curly haired, wearing-large-golden-earrings, type of Piet, which has definitely been very pervasive over the years.
I was confused about this at first, because although I did see it as a child, and thought it was weird that they had red lips and would talk funny, but when you get an explanation of 'chimney soot', you sort of accept/believe it as a child and move on.
The red lips and earrings are seriously racist now that I look at it again, after the uproar these past years, and it's not something that you can or should defend (looking at you neorej).
You're so biased it's making you blind of the most obvious thing everI don't think zwarte piet is a tradition rooted in slavery tbh. Slavery was never legal in the Netherlands. But it shouldn't matter.
You're so biased it's making you blind of the most obvious thing ever
Zwarte Piet is a fucking slave, any Dutch person knows this. Well, everybody not lying out of his ass knows.
Yes. Only he isn't. So you're the one who is lying. A knecht is not a slave, even though we frown at the connotation of the name now (the name evolved into 'mannetjes' or 'huisvrienden', or more in general 'assistent'). But a knecht was a pretty normal paid job until halfway into the sixties and seventies, and heck in some rural areas around the Bible belt, still well into the eighties and even nineties. Friends of mine used to have a knecht. We scoff at it now (did back then too), but he was certainly not a slave.You're so biased it's making you blind of the most obvious thing ever
Zwarte Piet is a fucking slave, any Dutch person knows this. Well, everybody not lying out of his ass knows.
Yes. Only he isn't. So you're the one who is lying. A knecht is not a slave, even though we frown at the connotation of the name now (the name evolved into 'mannetjes' or 'huisvrienden', or more in general 'assistent'). But a knecht was a pretty normal paid job until halfway into the sixties and seventies, and heck in some rural areas around the Bible belt, still well into the eighties and even nineties. Friends of mine used to have a knecht. We scoff at it now (did back then too), but he was certainly not a slave.
According to a story from the Legenda Aurea, retold by Eelco Verwijs in his monograph Sinterklaas (1863), one of the miraculous deeds performed by Saint Nicholas after his death consisted of freeing a boy from slavery at the court of the "Emperor of Babylon" and delivering him back to his parents. No mention is made of the boy's skin colour. However, in the course of the 20th century, both fictional and non-fictional narratives started to surface in which Zwarte Piet was considered a former slave who had been freed by the Saint and subsequently had become his lifelong companion.