It's decent, nowhere near as bad as people make it out to be.I haven't seen Avatar, yet. Is it good?
It's decent, nowhere near as bad as people make it out to be.I haven't seen Avatar, yet. Is it good?
It's decent, nowhere near as bad as people make it out to be.
Ah, makes sense, and Batman and Robin is god awful!Almost every movie that people hate on gaf isn't as bad as they're made out to be with only a few rare exceptions like...oh, I don't know...Batman and Robin maybe?
Nah. Ep 1 was hyped to the moon and it blew out its tires before it even got to the same city as Titanic.
You don't get to JC numbers off hype. TFW will hit big, and I mean big. But it'll phase out. That's what all hyped sequel films do.
He also knows how to tell a palatable story that gets said asses in seats. It's not an easy thing that he pulls off. The lazy approach is to say, "Hurr, hurr, it's just Pocahontas/Dances With Wolves/Ferngully In Space" to make oneself feel like that "saw through it all".
Congrats, you identified the basis for the movie but the execution is what people liked. I have always said this and I maintain it even till this day:
James had to get you to accept the risk of making 9 foot tall smurf believable for 2 hours and 40 minutes. I understand why he went with a timeless story of man goes native for a culture and woman he falls for. Any major risks in that movie narratively and the entire thing possibly falls apart.
It's like calling out George Lucas for using the Hero's Journey template for ANH. :|
I'd honestly be surprised if Avatar 2 even cracked a billion, let alone came anywhere close to Avatar 1.
same shit happened with Empire Strikes Back. Star Wars, like Avatar, was the event film that everyone went to check out. The sequel didn't have the same pull, even though it was coming off the highest grossing film of all time.
I think he meant to say two billion.WAT? Avatar 2 not making 1 billion? Star Wars overtaking Avatar's worldwide gross? What the hell are you guys on?!
I think he meant to say two billion.
EP 1 had a lot of hype followed by instant backlash
See where the numbers are... imagine if the movie was well received? It would have destroyed Titanic.
Because Avatar is a movie that rarely happens. The last one? Titanic. One before that? Star Wars. You can't predict those off "hype". You don't get "1.9%, 9.4%, 14.1%" drops week by week off hype. You can't predict that Granny Sarah and Grandpa Joe are in the theater with 3D glasses on to see this movie about blue aliens cat things.
We all know what to expect from Star Wars now. Hype alone doesn't push a film to Avatar numbers. Furious 7 broke all kinds of records and it's still over a billion shy of Avatar. JW came out and slapped haters to the #3 spot (myself included) and is still over a billion behind Avatar and it had to crawl to even get that close. Avatar made over $2 Billion internationally alone. HP never got that close. No SW movie ever got that close. Marvel. Transformers. Jurassic World. Etc. Not even scratching at the back door. This is the "Age of Ultron is going to dethrone Titanic because Marvel is so hot right now" all over again.
There is no formula where Star Wars + "Because Star Wars" = $3 Billion WW. You never saw it from any of the previous movies so assuming it's going to happen now is the definition of insanity. The market hasn't grown enough for that to be the case. Big movies are averaging $1.0-1.2 Billion. The really big ones a bit more. It will sell a lot. And it will most likely be the #3 and possibly #2 movie all time (doubt it) when it's said and done. But it's not beating Avatar.
Nah. Everyone who wanted to see it, saw it. The rest of the public who didn't, didn't. It's not rocket science.
But I'm too lazy to discuss this. I'll just repost what I said in another thread
Because Avatar is a movie that rarely happens. The last one? Titanic. One before that? Star Wars.
You forgot ET. It was bigger than Star Wars on initial release.
It still amazes me that, despite how successful the movie was, no one talks about Avatar outside of box office. No one gives two shits about it.
I think it's 2.8 now after a re releasePeople need to realize that Avatar didn't just make over 2 billion. It made 2.7 billion.
It won't beat Avatar but it'll definitely end up 3rd place under Titanic.
Quoting this post in a few years is going to be fun.
The amount of mental contortion that some posters here perform in attempting to explain Avatar's BO numbers is comical.
I think it's 2.8 now after a re release
I think it's 2.8 now after a re release
But yeah I have a feeling that the sequel will perform more like a normal mega blockbuster these days and "only" make 1.2-1.5 billion
I know better than to bet against James Cameron doing anything at this point
Note that I never said "It definitely won't happen". I'd just be really surprised. Not only have people forgotten about Avatar at this point, but people are way over 3D as well. Avatar 2 in 2017 just doesn't feel like a billion dollar grossing movie to me. But who knows.
I didn't think Avatar would shit all over Titanic's record either, yet here we are.
Note that I never said "It definitely won't happen". I'd just be really surprised. Not only have people forgotten about Avatar at this point, but people are way over 3D as well. Avatar 2 in 2017 just doesn't feel like a billion dollar grossing movie to me. But who knows.
I didn't think Avatar would shit all over Titanic's record either, yet here we are.
Spielberg had the #1 and #2 highest grossing films of all time for a few years after Jurassic Park. Nothing lasts forever.
I made the mistake of thinking Avatar wouldn't even do Star Wars numbers before it released. Much crow was eaten. As far as I'm concerned, the only thing that moves a James Cameron movie down a peg is another James Cameron movie.I know better than to bet against James Cameron doing anything at this point
You underestimate the power of the force!
This movie has world wide appeal. The hype is real. The product is fantastic! And the fans will be happy, and happy Star Wars fans shatter box office records!
I made the mistake of thinking Avatar wouldn't even do Star Wars numbers before it released. Much crow was eaten. As far as I'm concerned, the only thing that moves a James Cameron movie down a peg is another James Cameron movie.
I'm curious to see if this will actually pan out.
No doubt Star Wars will be huge, but I really find it hard to believe people are still gonna be talking about it January 17th.
I straight up thought Avatar was going to bomb. It felt like there was no fucking hype for it. Anecdotally it seemed like everyone I knew was underwhelmed by the trailers. Then the thing hit, then just kept hitting, every day, for weeks, then months.
Avatar is badasss.Unlike Avatar, I expect people will continue to talk about this movie in contexts that aren't related to its box office take in 6 years
I thought Avatar would do well, but I was expecting something closer to $750M worldwide, not domestic.
EDIT: I remember getting that third weekend gross worldwide and realizing that Titanic was going down. Even though it was obvious by that point, a lot of people refused to believe it because it seemed so crazy.
Feel free to re-live that third-weekeng gross again.
Feel free to re-live that third-weekeng gross again.
I know better than to bet against James Cameron doing anything at this point
I haven't seen Avatar, yet. Is it good?
I haven't seen Avatar, yet. Is it good?
I love Cameron but this just seems like a weird thing to hang a hat on. Dude has had an amazing career but people keep trying to make some kind of narrative that everything he makes is the biggest thing ever. T2 was huge, yes, but not the biggest thing ever. True Lies was just a normal size hit. Aliens was a surprise and did great but was still "only" the #7 movie of '86 and bracketed by movies that have since been largely forgotten ("The Golden Child" and "Back to School"). The Abyss was considered a failure in some circles and didn't make a dent in a very crowded summer.
Cameron's movies stand the test of time no doubt (seriously, who even talks about "The Golden Child" anymore) but I think people are buying too much into this myth that everything he puts out are 4 quadrant blockbusters that reach beyond the bounds of the rest of film making world,.
I think people are buying too much into this myth that everything he puts out are 4 quadrant blockbusters that reach beyond the bounds of the rest of film making world,.
People are judging JC's last 2 at bats. In those, he broke the record, took 12 years off and then broke his own record.
It's like looking at Jordan's career prior to 1991 and exclaiming he wasn't always the GOAT. I mean, no one (besides him) has surpassed the WW gross he hauled in back in 1997, almost 20 fucking years ago.
That's what he's done the past two times and is clearly the main thing he wants to do now, so it isn't that weird.
I believe the saying "You're only as good as your last movie" kind of applies here. Cameron's reputation has changed over the course of his career, but he's always produced films that pushed the effects envelope. As he's progressed, he's gotten better at being a self-described "populist film maker", and as a result each movie has typically been bigger than the last.I love Cameron but this just seems like a weird thing to hang a hat on. Dude has had an amazing career but people keep trying to make some kind of narrative that everything he makes is the biggest thing ever. T2 was huge, yes, but not the biggest thing ever. True Lies was just a normal size hit. Aliens was a surprise and did great but was still "only" the #7 movie of '86 and bracketed by movies that have since been largely forgotten ("The Golden Child" and "Back to School"). The Abyss was considered a failure in some circles and didn't make a dent in a very crowded summer.
Cameron's movies stand the test of time no doubt (seriously, who even talks about "The Golden Child" anymore) but I think people are buying too much into this myth that everything he puts out are 4 quadrant blockbusters that reach beyond the bounds of the rest of film making world,.