nature boy
Member
Wow Ferrari are really throwing Alonso under the bus just because he's unhappy with their shitty cars.
Ungrateful cunts.
Ungrateful cunts.
Honestly, why would any of these drivers leave their respective teams for a team that hasn't been champion for 7 years. It would make no sense, they're all in superior (or at the very least, equal) teams already.
This. And given the fact that Red Bull are still a fucking powerhouse of a team and the fact that this season was always going to be Mercedes's, it makes no sense to consider leaving RBR at this stage.I don't see Ricciardo leaving Red Bull since he's doing so well and also because they've shown so much faith in him, he's sure to have some loyalty to the team.
Wow Ferrari are really throwing Alonso under the bus just because he's unhappy with their shitty cars.
Ungrateful cunts.
I don't see Ricciardo leaving Red Bull since he's doing so well and also because they've shown so much faith in him, he's sure to have some loyalty to the team.
I still believe the key to this driver market (besides a 3rd car introduction) is Vettel and not Alonso. If Vettel stays put everything stays the same. If he does indeed want to leave now and Ferrari doesn't get rid of Alonso does he accept McLaren gigantic rumored offer? Is that why Ferrari is leaking stories that infuriated Abad and the rest of Alonso's management?
He's not going to leave especially considering he's now Marko's new golden boy.
Yeah those trophies are for the workers right...Ron Dennis is a comedian.
Uhm, no. That would be Verstappen.
Marko came out with some big talk about Verstappen.
Saying he is a once in decades talent.
The winning constructor get trophies for race wins. I don't understand why McLaren want the driver trophies too.I agree with Dennis on that though, trophies should really be team property and be displayed at the factory. The entire point of a racing team is collecting wins, it's only logical the rewards of their hard work are on display there.
The winning constructor get trophies for race wins. I don't understand why McLaren want the driver trophies too.
The winning constructor get trophies for race wins. I don't understand why McLaren want the driver trophies too.
If Vettel struggles to podium a car that his rookie teammate can take to three wins, I can't wait to see how well he does in the turd that is Ferrari.
Yes, I'd love to see it the other way around. Alonso WDCx4 (unless Danny gets there first).
Wow Ferrari are really throwing Alonso under the bus just because he's unhappy with their shitty cars.
Ungrateful cunts.
The winning constructor get trophies for race wins. I don't understand why McLaren want the driver trophies too.
Because it's not just the driver winning the race or podiums, it's also the engineers, the guys changing the engine all Friday long, the pit crew changing the tires with precise precision as quickly as possible, all the workers in the factory working 16-hour shifts in pre-season getting the car ready for the next season and barely seeing their family.
Because it's not just the driver winning the race or podiums, it's also the engineers, the guys changing the engine all Friday long, the pit crew changing the tires with precise precision as quickly as possible, all the workers in the factory working 16-hour shifts in pre-season getting the car ready for the next season and barely seeing their family.
Right, but the factory workers and boys on the pit wall didnt drive the car to a first place finish in torrential downpour in Japan and they didnt drive it from plum last to a first place finish in Montreal. Those feats were because of the brilliance of the driver on that specific day.
But the engineer deciding to go from wet tires to intermediate tires at exactly the right time was definitely not involved in making sure the driver made up 3 places as the rest waited one lap too long.
Because it's not just the driver winning the race or podiums, it's also the engineers, the guys changing the engine all Friday long, the pit crew changing the tires with precise precision as quickly as possible, all the workers in the factory working 16-hour shifts in pre-season getting the car ready for the next season and barely seeing their family.
http://www.formula1.com/news/interviews/2014/9/16399.htmlQ: Youve been the driving force behind Max Verstappens signing with Toro Rosso for next season. What do you expect from someone so young?
HM: He is an exceptional talent that comes along only once in decades
Q: Can you compare him to anyone?
HM: Most likely Ayrton Senna. And in such a case you must not look at his age. He has been talking with people who are experts when it comes to the development of youngsters and they all say that (in terms of) his mind he is more like 22 than 16. And regarding his skills behind the steering wheel, he has been racing since he was four years old - professionally. So we expect him to be competitive from the first race. We are not playing the lottery - we know what we are doing. And success proves us right.
Q: How will you work with him? Might he need a lot more attention than somebody slightly older?
HM: As I said: mentally he is past 20 years old! And yes, we work with him intensively. He will do some Friday runs. Not long ago he did a 400 km test in Italy, hes in the simulator whenever possible and hes working on his physique and psychology with top experts. Yes, some things became visible that we will have to address for the 2015 season. Having said that, he is getting the perfect schooling before he gets on the grid.
I don't even think you can sign a letter of intent without getting permission from the current employer. PEACE.
Nope, that's standard procedure in F1.
Helmut painting a nice, red target on Max Verstappen's back. Im sure Max and his father appreciate that kind comparison to Senna.
In silly season talk or in actual legal speak? I know we hear about this stuff all the time from the tabloids, but in actual legal terms, what loophole is there that allows someone under contract to sign a letter of intent with another company, without gaining permission from the current employer?
... but an out-and-out ink and paper transaction? Seems a high risk to take for little reward. PEACE.
Horner joked at Singapore that Ricciardo is under contract for 10 years.
Strictly speaking, a LOI is a legally non-binding document. You only outline broad strokes of what both sides would do, IF it ever came to a contract. So as such, you simply cannot forbid anyone to set up such a thing, as you are not breaking any contract.
Gracias, amigo. I've learned something new today. I was legit miffed before.Strictly speaking, a LOI is a legally non-binding document. You only outline broad strokes of what both sides would do, IF it ever came to a contract. So as such, you simply cannot forbid anyone to set up such a thing, as you are not breaking any contract.
In the end, the LOI is just written proof, that both sides are seriously interested in each other, and signing it is a show of commitment. Yet in the end, I would estimate 90% never get executed, or the timeframe set runs out.
The VET LOI was first only noticed, because the champion and FER were involved. But it was soon shrugged off, as these LOI´s usually are. But then persistent talk started, that there are some hooks in it - but up to today, no one knows which. From what I know of these LOI´s, I can only speculate that both sides have some kind of execution rights, as everything is usually set up on reciprocity.
Well, not really. Have to question whether Alonso giving back the two spots rather than one would've made a difference. Given how closely they finished, I'd argue it did.Seb's been better as the season's gone on. Outqualified Ricciardo like 4 out of the last 6 races and beat him fair and square at Singapore. It seems his number one issue now is tyre management, which Dany is better at. For now. Fact is, the guy is getting used to these cars and we're seeing flashes of his old self alot more now. I expect him to be going blow for blow with Ricciardo by the end of the season.
Unfortunately, that's been the same story for the last 6 or so years. I'm yet to see how anything will be any different over the next 6 (but I'd love to be proven wrong, regardless of who drives for them).As for Maranello, I think Ferrari can build a competitive car in the next three years. They have good personnel there that just need some time to unfuck that team. They clearly have a serious problem with their production chain and testing.
That said...huh. Now wasn't this LOI thing rumored for more than a year now? I'm seeing smoke here. There's gotta be flames feeding this. PEACE.
german media: http://www.motorsport-total.com/f1/...-wechsel-zu-ferrari-vorerst-aus-14092408.html
vettel is staying at red bull next year.
he added: older drivers told me its something special to win in a ferrari.
Bernie telling the teams that they have the power to lower ticket prices...by accepting less money from the sport.
Lorenzo De Luca ‏@LorenzoDL83 42m
@CorSport "The most likely 2015 scenario sees #Alonso in #Mclaren and #Vettel to #Ferrari"
‏
Lorenzo De Luca ‏@LorenzoDL83 50m
@tuttosport "#Honda 100 millions for 3 years (contract already signed ) for #Alonso, " pic.twitter.com/99429CSrTc
Alonso going back to McLaren? I'm really surprised...