DrForester
Kills Photobucket
Might have been from one of the trailers.
Freedom Fighters - Two Steps from HellRickard said:I listened through the newest movies soundtrack, couldn't find it.
Help me Trek-GAF, You are my only hope.
laserbeam said:Freedom Fighters - Two Steps from Hell
I accept credit or paypal
Trailer 3
But Picard only created it in the first place because Q was flipping him about to mess with him.Teh Hamburglar said:It wasn't Q who created the anomly in the finale, it was Picard. Q just gave Picard an opportunity to fix it.
JoshuaJSlone said:But Picard only created it in the first place because Q was flipping him about to mess with him.
beelzebozo said:speaking of picard, i wanted to confess that even as a primarily DS9 fan, watching the TNG episode "measure of a man" and comparing that to the DS9 episode in which sisqo defends worf it became abundantly clear that patrick stewart completely destroys avery brooks where dramatic oratory is concerned. i'm still a huge sisqo fan, but stewart has such a great ability to present a situation dramatically but also completely convincingly and with such conviction.
Teh Hamburglar said:huh what?
I like "Matter of Perspective" because of the different holographic testimonies.BorkBork said:I think Measure of the Man was the first bonafide masterpiece of TNG. All other subsequent copycat court dramas in the franchise pale in comparison not just because of the acting performances (Frakes was actually really good as well), but the subject material that was dealt with.
benjipwns said:I like "Matter of Perspective" because of the different holographic testimonies.
YOU'RE A DEAD MAN, APGAR. A DEAD MAN!
DrForester said:While I think there's many great examples of TNG acting, I thought "Measures of a Man" was way to preachy and over the top.
Not to mention I always find it hard to take anyone seriously in the first two seasons because of the uniforms.
maharg said:Court dramas in Star Trek go back a lot farther than Measure of a Man. That episode is basically a retread of Court Martial in TOS.
benjipwns said:I like "Matter of Perspective" because of the different holographic testimonies.
YOU'RE A DEAD MAN, APGAR. A DEAD MAN!
DarthWoo said:It was Q who first started throwing Picard between the three time periods. If he hadn't done that, Picard would never have had the opportunity to fire that beam in the same spot in three separate time periods. Whole mess of causality issues.
Teh Hamburglar said:No. The anomoly was growing backwards through time. Q just allowed Picard to exist in all 3 time periods so he could stop it. IT wasnt the beam that ended humanity. It was the anamoly that stopped the origin of life from occuring on earth.
DrForester said:It's a big time paradox. Because future Picard never would have gone to the location without Q's involvement and Future Picard is the reason the beam was used in that location. Not like the episode didn't have other ones. If the anomaly grew as it went back in time, why was the future crew able to see it if they created it when they used their magic beam.
Anasui Kishibe said:Chain of Command, to me, is Stewart's finest hour. Picard here shows that his willpower is his greatest strenght, and Stewart portrays his emotions in such a convincing way no "In the pale moonlight" Brooks could ever top. His voice is broken but firm, his eyes and body devastated, but nothing of this matters to him
when I think about a Starfleet Captain, I think Picard
Teh Hamburglar said:But Picard was JUST ABOUT to break when the Cardassian entered and said they were returning Picard. Stewart said he actually did alot of research on torture for that episode. He watched tapes and really got into it.
beelzebozo said:the fascination with bringing back tasha yar over and over on TNG is really kind of creepy.
I always thought of it as it got created in that future timeline due to the time/anti-time explosion, but after formation always stayed the same size going forward. Again, it gets BIGGER as you go into the past.Jack Random said:even though i really enjoyed the episode, it has one of the biggest plot holes in all of trekdom, Qs involvement or no.
The future enterprise goes back to the scene of the anomaly after they convince Riker, once there, they are able to do the whole static warp shell thing, the problem is that the anomaly travels backwards through time, this is specifically mentioned as the reason why they did NOT see the anomaly when on the Pasteur.
Since it travels backwards, there's no reason for them to have seen it on the future enterprise, which was not on the scene until later.
beelzebozo said:the fascination with bringing back tasha yar over and over on TNG is really kind of creepy.
beelzebozo said:the fascination with bringing back tasha yar over and over on TNG is really kind of creepy.
That comparison doesn't really work though, as Sela never appeared post-TNG right? Since she's really only in TNG, the only other proper faces is the Duras family for the Klingons. And the Cardassians never got a proper face until well into DS9 after TNG ended as Dukat wasn't truly representative as "the main bad guy" until the events leading up to the whole Dominion War.DrForester said:Sela also tried to give a face for the Romulans, something I think was missing to make them really a good villain on Star Trek (Tomalak was pretty lame). Klingon's had Gowron, Cardassians had Dukat, etc. Romulans lacked a leader.
beelzebozo said:maybe creepy is the wrong word. it's just really unusual watching an episode like "YESTERDAY'S ENTERPRISE" with this person who is dead in the main series timeline having such an effect on the alternate timeline, and the writers asking you to care a lot about a decision that eventually puts her right back on the injured list (so to speak). it's just interesting, i guess, that someone killed in the first season of the show continued to play such a big role for its duration.
and maybe i keep hitting episodes with her present so it just seems weird. it should be said that she's a constant presence in data's personal life (his little hologram portrait of her), and then the stuff from "YESTERDAY'S ENTERPRISE," "ALL GOOD THINGS" which i watched long ago and remember fondly, and a few other times i think she shows up in some form.
it's just not something i'm used to in a television series i suppose.
XiaNaphryz said:That comparison doesn't really work though, as Sela never appeared post-TNG right? Since she's really only in TNG, the only other proper faces is the Duras family for the Klingons. And the Cardassians never got a proper face until well into DS9 after TNG ended as Dukat wasn't truly representative as "the main bad guy" until the events leading up to the whole Dominion War.
DrForester said:Wasn't like they brought her back from the dead or something lame like that.
XiaNaphryz said:
Anasui Kishibe said:speaking of which, have they ever given any explanation about the whole Tasha/Sela resemblance? I suspect they did but can't remember what it was about
DrForester already handled it, but still check this site out for lots of detailed backgrounds on everything Star Trek: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/SelaAnasui Kishibe said:speaking of which, have they ever given any explanation about the whole Tasha/Sela thing? I suspect they did but can't remember what it was about
Anasui Kishibe said:speaking of which, have they ever given any explanation about the whole Tasha/Sela thing? I suspect they did but can't remember what it was about
Acid08 said:I saw Wrath of Khan for the first time recently. Goddamn the movie sucked, and I'm a huge fan of TOS after powering through most of it on YouTube :lol . Ricardo Mantebaun is such a shit villain.
Exhibit's main website.Highlights include
* Recreation of the bridge of the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D, featured in Star Trek: The Next Generation
* Shinzons throne featured in the film Star Trek: Nemesis
* A replica of the sickbay from Star Trek: The Next Generation. The ships sickbay was the setting for many of the shows most important scenes.
* Recreation of the Engineering Room from the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D
* Original Series Captains chair recreation
* Genuine Props and costumes from the entire Star Trek franchise, including JJ Abrams Star Trek
Teh Hamburglar said:LOL seeing Crusher go crazy was fun.
"Just you and me, roaming teh galaxy without a crew."
"We've never neede a crew before."
I saw it and its really not impressive at all. Really disappointed to be honest. Could have been waaaay better.XiaNaphryz said:For the Cali Trekkies, if you missed it in San Diego earlier in the year the Star Trek exhibit is coming back!
For SoCal, Star Trek: The Exhibit opens at the Hollywood & Highland Center this weekend (Oct 10).
For NorCal, Star Trek: The Exhibit opens at the San Jose Tech Museum on Friday Oct 23.
Exhibit's main website.
General reaction to the exhibit in other cities earlier in the year since the San Diego show are mixed. Lots of complaints about not being able to take your own pictures (apparently people were selling photos taken at the SD show on Ebay), some sets showed significant wear-and-tear in some cities, and very high prices for shots taken by professionals at the show itself. But still, it's Trek props!