SF Debris just posted part 1 of their "Chain of Command" review.
Trying to watch it but Blip doesn't seem to be working, just hangs on an endless loading icon.
SF Debris just posted part 1 of their "Chain of Command" review.
SF Debris just posted part 1 of their "Chain of Command" review.
I am jealous cause Netflix Canada only has the Star Trek movies
US netflix doesn't have any Star Trek movie afaik.
My Star Trek kick of a couple years continues. I am slowly getting through DS9, somewhere in season 3 or so, and it's good, but it still hasn't really "hooked" me yet. I decided to watch an episode of TNG instead the other week, and that has sucked me in once again.
I also watched William Shatner's "Get a Life" doc on netflix, and that was an interesting watch. I didn't enjoy it as much as The Captains, but it was still cool.
Also the entire run of DS9 are deathly boring.
Hmm so I watched the TNG Episode "Remember Me" yesterday as it was one of the few episodes that I didn't know yet
Also the first three seasons of DS9 are deathly boring.
Also the first three seasons of DS9 are deathly boring.
Wow. I've not seen it yet as I'm making my way through Star Trek for the first time and am on s6 of TNG, but these opinions surprise me. I've been under the impression that the series is many fans' favorite.Fixed for accuracy.
How much you like TOS is directly related to how much you like the first two seasons of TNG. I think it's possible to enjoy S1 and S2 of TNG for what they are, but it's just weird seeing 70s scifi conventions in the late 80s.Wow. I've not seen it yet as I'm making my way through Star Trek for the first time and am on s6 of TNG, but these opinions surprise me. I've been under the impression that the series is many fans' favorite.
I'm not discouraged, though, since I highly enjoyed the first two seasons of TNG, subsequently finding out that they're generally thought weak.
I've been on a Star Trek marathon but the show isn't hooking me the way it did when I was younger. I think modern TV has spoiled me because I can't go back to procedural type shows anymore (which is probably why I absolutely loath Voyager).
I would really love to see a new series which has an ongoing narrative rather than mystery of the week stories. They kind of did that with Enterprise and with DS9 (which I really appreciated) but I would love a series with a focus on larger arcs and character development.
How much you like TOS is directly related to how much you like the first two seasons of TNG. I think it's possible to enjoy S1 and S2 of TNG for what they are, but it's just weird seeing 70s scifi conventions in the late 80s.
Like, the race politics is so old fashioned. lol
That's just the first season, season 2 already has some of the very best ST episodes ever made. Like Q Who and The Measure of a Man.
I think both of those are actually pretty TOS-y. They're just like the best and most enduring qualities of TOS rather than the parts that don't hold up.
In particular, Measure of a Man is really reminiscent of a couple of courtroom drama episodes of TOS (The Menagerie and Court Martial). And Q's early episodes are like The Squire of Gothos on steroids.
Hmm so I watched the TNG Episode "Remember Me"
(I don't want to ruin the fun for anyone that hasn't seen it yet, that's why I hid some things )
That's because TNG is good.
So, I somewhat randomly did a google image search of Worf's son Alexander, and came across more recent pictures of the actor who played him. :O
So, I somewhat randomly did a google image search of Worf's son Alexander, and came across more recent pictures of the actor who played him. :O
Talk about an out-of-this-world proposal!
An avid Star Trek fan popped the question during a "Star Trek: The Next Generation" cast photo op on Oct. 28 at the Austin Wizard World Con, and Wil Wheaton who played Wesley Crusher on the '90s sci-fi show was seated next to the unsuspecting bride-to-be.
Video: I do cam catches intimate wedding moments (on this page)
The proposal pic popped up on Reddit, a popular online sharing site, and the sci-fi star who has also had guest appearances on "The Big Bang Theory" detailed the experience in the comments section.
"About 30 minutes or so into this particular session, these two people came in. The girl went to stand between Patrick [Stewart] and [Jonathan] Frakes, and the guy directed her to stand in the front, instead," Wheaton recounts. "All of us tried to figure out what was going on ... and the guy said, 'I really love Star Trek, but I love [her name] even more.' He got down on one knee, and proposed to her."
Good looking month for SFDebris. The Angel One review should be hilarious.
So why are there no seat belts atleast shuttles-like ships? Because it seems like they crash onto a planet every now and then and people get injured or die just because they had no seat belt to protect them.
Same goes to really important crew members on ships during battles. Something explodes, they fly around and are dead or get injured because they hit sth. That's totally unnecessary, as we discovered in the 20th century...
(I'm partly joking and being partly serious, because it's striking how many advantages seat belts would have, while they have no disadvantages at all)
So why are there no seat belts atleast shuttles-like ships? Because it seems like they crash onto a planet every now and then and people get injured or die just because they had no seat belt to protect them.
Same goes to really important crew members on ships during battles. Something explodes, they fly around and are dead or get injured because they hit sth. That's totally unnecessary, as we discovered in the 20th century...
(I'm partly joking and being partly serious, because it's striking how many advantages seat belts would have, while they have no disadvantages at all)
There's no logical reason for it. The shows' creators forgot about it until Star Trek: Nemesis, and then deleted the scene that showed them introducing seat belts.
I don't think they forgot about it as much as didn't care about it. And seatbelts on a spaceship actually first appeared in First Contact. Riker, Geordi, and Cochrane were wearing them in the Phoenix.
There's no logical reason for it. The shows' creators forgot about it until Star Trek: Nemesis, and then deleted the scene that showed them introducing seat belts.
got access to the US Netflix via VPN, talk about a STAR TREK GALORE!!
In-universe answer is inertial dampeners with triple redundancy.
got access to the US Netflix via VPN, talk about a STAR TREK GALORE!!
I always thought it was funny that there were no crash fields in TNG era trek and onwards.
The technology was heavy into forcefields, with emergency fields sealing every hull breach and securing any ship corridor from intruders. So why no cabin-filling force field in shuttles and such to catch everyone in mid-air? Same concept as airbags.
Tempted to do that with my own but the settings I used before now seem to not work, ah well.
UK Netflix sucks so much compared to the US one.
I use this site: works really well
http://www.unblock-us.com/
I finished season 1 of DS9 yesterday and the season was mostly average, but 'Duet' was a highlight and dare I say one of the best episodes in Star Trek I've seen.
They showed up in the TNG episode "Power Play", but only because the plot demanded an irreparable shuttle crash that didn't harm its passengers.So why are there no seat belts atleast shuttles-like ships? Because it seems like they crash onto a planet every now and then and people get injured or die just because they had no seat belt to protect them.
I don't think they forgot about it as much as didn't care about it. And seatbelts on a spaceship actually first appeared in First Contact. Riker, Geordi, and Cochrane were wearing them in the Phoenix.