That looks great. This is what people were complaining about?
Not saying 60fps doesn't look pretty awesome for action like that, but the 24fps clip looks down-converted from 60fps. 24fps film doesn't usually look that strobed and stuttery.
HFR also minimizes the appearance of motion artifacts — especially when viewed in a theater. Moving objects may strobe or have a “picket fence” appearance as they traverse a large screen. At 24 fps, a 50 foot screen shows an object as jumping in 2 foot increments if that object takes one second to traverse the screen. This can appear as “judder” with fast panning and other types of camera movements.
Also, the above examples are not the result of a 3:2 pulldown from 60 fps to 24 fps; each was shot independently using the same shutter angle and pan rate.
I think anything that doesn't resemble latex and makeup will look fake to some. 24 fps effect and all that.yea, looked like a well done action scene to me. what was supposed to be wrong with it?
Now this kinda took me out of the moment.Wilhelm Scream? Check.
Why do some of the dwarves look like dwarves, and others not at all?
Wilhelm Scream? Check.
2.+1
I am curious as to the running total of Wilhelms in the Lord of the Rings movies
Hm, website says:
Looks like a video game.
I need to be playing the games you are playing.
60 fps is where it's at:
24 fps: http://red.cachefly.net/learn/action-24fps.mp4
60 fps: http://red.cachefly.net/learn/action-60fps.mp4
It looks like a video game in that situations are increasingly implausible, characters appear to be in no mortal danger due to plot armor, and nothing looks tangible or real.
It's calculated to a fault.
It looks like a video game in that situations are increasingly implausible, characters appear to be in no mortal danger due to plot armor, and nothing looks tangible or real.
It's calculated to a fault.
The Goblin chase looks fun to me.
There doesn't seem to be any sense of danger, but I guess that's a common theme in the movie. Shit.
That Goblin youtube clip looked amazing. Was expecting to hate it but loved it.
The hell are you guys talking about, the visuals in that clip are great.
I think it's finally dawning on some people that this is a children's movie. The dark, foreboding themes from Rings have been replaced with keystone capers and light-hearted popcorn frivolity.
My girlfriend will almost certainly be bitterly disappointed by the drastic change in tone from her all-time favorite movie series, but I'll be perfectly content.
MY EYES
nope nope nope. I dont like it
MY EYES
nope nope nope. I dont like it
In case anyone hasn't caught it yet, there's a nice 2.5 min. 3D trailer for the movie on Nintendo Video. It really sells the movie better than any trailer I'd seen previously myself.
MY EYES
nope nope nope. I dont like it
Don't worry too much about rottentomatoes, they have a piece of shit like King Kong at 84% and a masterpiece like Hook at 29%damn, i just checked those metacritic and rottentomato averages and .... what happened there?
Courtesy of their hall is somewhat lessened of late.damn, i just checked those metacritic and rottentomato averages and .... what happened there?
IMDB though, it's sitting at 9.2 currently, not sure what's going on but it's probably too early to say, i'm sure i will enjoy it no matter what, just surprised at some of these huge discrepancies.
And while there can be some "unnatural smoothness" in HFR, detail and color were astoundingly vivid, much more so than what a TV algorithm produces. Swooping through action shots above and underground, or as hordes of digital warriors clashed on battlefields, I could see everything. In a word: breathtaking.
It's probably also important to mention that, while the 3D itself is very good, it's not nearly as striking or beautifully immersive as 'Life of Pi'. Everything stays "behind" the screen and, actually, you forget about the 3D after a while, but perhaps that's the point. It's just a story, regardless of the format.
If you enjoy ultra-sharp HD -- that infinite depth, those crisp textures from something like super-slow-motion cinematography -- and aren't the biggest fan of natural motion blur or noise or grain, you'll probably enjoy HFR. However, if you despise the way your TV can smooth things out via TruMotion type settings -- that odd motion it gives performers in motion -- you probably won't be the biggest HFR fan.
Regardless, it's a decision every film fan or HD junkie will have to make him or herself. So go see 'The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey' however you like, but I would encourage at least checking out the new format. You might love it; you might hate it; you might not care. But it's certainly different.
The will of Eru Iluvatar, just as the will of Eru Iluvatar guided Frodo to Mount Doom. Bilbo was meant to go on that quest, just as Frodo was meant to take the One Ring to meets its destruction.I'm sure this has been discussed to death earlier in the thread but did Tolkien or Jackson ever come up with a good compelling reason why Bilbo needs to go on this quest, or is it still just "Gandalf is kind of a dick who makes him a guinea pig for hobbit-kind?"
Hook is garbage. Should be lower than 29%.Don't worry too much about rottentomatoes, they have a piece of shit like King Kong at 84% and a masterpiece like Hook at 29%