Napalm_Frank
Member
We already see him torturing animals in the trailer!
''A dark power has found a way back into the world.''
The trailer will never be same again.
We already see him torturing animals in the trailer!
Edmond Dantès;45121897 said:Two new TV spots
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_9z7XG27Z8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxiaPev0n78
First shots of the Ring-wraith
Tales from the Perilous Realm and Letters from Father Christmas would be good additions.I'm probably gonna re-read Tolkein's works over christmas now, the hype for this movie has convinced me to do so. I think my collection consists of:
- The Simarillion
- The Children of Hurin
- Unfinished Tales
- The Hobbit
- LOTR
Anything else that I'm leaving out that would make a good addition?
Edmond Dantès;45122976 said:
He wouldn't need the One Ring to be evil.
A Tom Bombadil ruled earth. You can just hear the Ring a ding dilos!
.....what...why?
I thought they were in hibernation for hundreds of years...
.....what...why?
I thought they were in hibernation for hundreds of years...
Edmond Dantès;45123083 said:Supposedly there's a Dunedain/Nazgul sub plot.
wights?
Edmond Dantès;45123167 said:Second film, once the White Council/Necromancer sub plot really gets going. From what I understand AUJ sets the seeds for the sub plot without too much emphasis on who The Necromancer is. More is most probably revealed in Desolation and his minions; wolves, bats, Wights etc
All the individual elements are done. Just have to put it together now, which shouldn't take long. It'll be up today sometime during UK evening time.Where's the OT at? I come home.. for THIS?
I should fucking kill you! [/Henry Hill]
Meanwhile, Tolkien had the name Lúthien engraved on Edith's tombstone at Wolvercote Cemetery, Oxford. When Tolkien died 21 months later on 2 September 1973, at the age of 81,[84] he was buried in the same grave, with Beren added to his name.
I've actually been to Wolvercote cemetery in Oxford and left a token of my appreciation. I took photos too and posted them in here a while a go now.Reading the Tokein Wiki and was reminded of this, absolutely beautiful when you know the story behind it.
Why is it bullshit? Was it confirmed that those reports were made up? People get motion sick even watching regular films so it is certainly possible some would feel motion sick watching this film for the first time. Lets wait and see.
Edmond Dantès;45123358 said:I've actually been to Wolvercote cemetery in Oxford and left a token of my appreciation. I took photos too and posted them in here a while a go now.
Here's my post:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=36741791&postcount=2130
I'm making this my number one stop the next time I'm in England!
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
The Lord of the Rings trilogy behind him, Peter Jackson has begun yet another, this time adapting the Tolkien epic, The Hobbit. Flashing up the fantasy with soaring swagger, a bit of the jolly and some brand new shooting techniques, he delivers a long, but pretty fun ride.
Let’s get that technical stuff out of the way. The film was shot in 3D 48 frames-per-second and is being released in that High Frame Rate, traditional 3D and also in 2D formats. So, you buy your ticket, you take your choice. I, who has had some dizzying effects from earlier standard 3D films, was perfectly fine watching this one, although I have heard others complain. While it was jarring when the few brightly lit scenes took on the look of a TV video game, generally, I thought the look and the 3D effects were pretty cool.
Usually, when I see five writers given credit on a film, I assume we’re in for trouble. However, Jackson, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Guillermo del Toro (along with Tolkien’s original story) weave a tale that flows, even when it reminds us of other moments seen previously in the Rings movies. We also are greeted with happy reunions. Ian McKellen has a sizeable role again as Gandalf, Cate Blanchett shows up as Galadriel, Ian Holm as Old Bilbo, Christopher Lee as Sauman, Hugo Weaving as Elrond and don’t blink or you’ll miss Elijah Wood as Frodo. Andy Serkis gets a good chuck of screen time to re-work his magic as Gollum and, in the central role as Bilbo Baggins, Martin Freeman is a delight.
And, of course, there are effects. Tons of them, along with massive action scenes, and lots of fantasy adventure. And boy, does it move! Even at a running time of 2 hours and 46 minutes, no one will have time to get bored. I wasn’t particularly amused by the very dumb jokes that are spread throughout. Those, while lightening up the tone, seem to be aiming for the little kids who probably wouldn’t be able to follow much more else here.
There’s no question Jackson and company are off to an ambitious start here, with a few bumps along the way. The Rings trilogy grew stronger as it went along; I see no reason why the Hobbit one won’t either.
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
harryallen ‏@harryallen
Saw *The Hobbit*, last night. Got director Peter Jackson to sign my book of stories about on the Alaska Pipeline. (It was all I had.)
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Is that from the 3rd film then?
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Edmond Dantès;45124268 said:
Nah, it was like the vlogs Peter did during shooting but with cast interviews and new footage.Looks to be a dead link now. Was this the piece from NBC's Rock Center with Anne Curry interviewing PJ? That's supposed to air tonight in the U.S.