Edmond Dantès
Dantès the White
Isn't it about time for another video log? Or have they stopped doing those?
Probably get another one to coincide with the next trailer in July with TDKR, possibly.
Isn't it about time for another video log? Or have they stopped doing those?
Gandalf looks great and this depiction of the Witch-King isn't too shabby either.Great pics over at iO9 today.
I had no clue that Frank Frazetta did Lord of the Rings art. It's beautiful, but some of it is way way beyond canon. Gollum looks like a happy goblin and Eowyn doesn't have any pants on and apparently there are either thongs in Middle-Earth or she's going near nude from her waist down to prove to the Witch King that she was indeed NO MAN.
http://io9.com/5911710/frank-frazet...tions-brought-barbarian-armor-to-middle-earth
Great pics over at iO9 today.
I had no clue that Frank Frazetta did Lord of the Rings art. It's beautiful, but some of it is way way beyond canon. Gollum looks like a happy goblin and Eowyn doesn't have any pants on and apparently there are either thongs in Middle-Earth or she's going near nude from her waist down to prove to the Witch King that she was indeed NO MAN.
Edmond Dantès;38092111 said:Some nice aerial shots of Hobbiton.
http://www.*****************/tvshow...Hobbiton-Peter-Jacksons-magical-film-set.html
It's the Daily Mail.erm, you might wanna check that URL
SourcePeter Jackson (and his team) has now shot the equivalent of 20 million feet of film on The Hobbit. For reference, he shot 7 million feet of film on The Lord of the Rings trilogy.
Peter is shooting up to 50 RED Epics on The Hobbit. And there is still time to go...
When I had dinner with Peter a couple of weeks ago... he was happy. If Peter is happy, I'm happy.
Call it morbid curiosity, but I'm really interested in finding out what the final bill for both Hobbit films will be for WB/New Line...wouldn't be surprised at all if it were in the neighborhood of $300+ million, largely because of all the fancy tech being used for it.
But hey, if I had to pick a book adaption to get that kind of green and space-age tech thrown at it, it'd probably be a Tolkien creation (rather than, say, a Transformers sequel). I have no doubt they'll easily get their money back, what with Tolkien's worldwide audience probably doubling as a result of Jackson's films.
Give or take a couple of months and we should have a new trailer to salivate over.I want a new trailer, dammit.
DAT 48FPS 3D DATA.
Fixed.
They tend to be every three months or so. There could be another one coming to coincide with the second trailer.When should we expect another production blog? or is it just random?
I havent really followed the movie after the first trailer but the negative reception from the 48fps clips make me nervous :<.
I havent really followed the movie after the first trailer but the negative reception from the 48fps clips make me nervous :<.
Plenty of time in post-production to deal with any of these little issues. Peter and co have great love for Middle-earth and they won't produce a film that's anything less than perfect in their eyes.Most of the complaints that has me worried is that the make up and prosthetic are noticeable which would suck a lot.
OK, was going to make a new topic for this, but thought I'd throw this in since, as someone else said, this seems to nearly be a Tolkien OT.
Now, I've read both The Hobbit and LOTR multiple times, but I've just started in on a re-read of the Hobbit (since it's been years for that one) and will jump into another read of LOTR after a few things I want to get read after the Hobbit. Now, I've never read any of the supplemental materials, like the Appendices in LOTR or The Silmarillion, though I've owned a copy of the latter for years. Is there better order to read these in (the LOTR Appendices vs Silmarillion) or does it really matter? Also, outside of that, what other Tolkien stuff do people recommend that's not the big two?
Edmond Dantès;38245504 said:Plenty of time in post-production to deal with any of these little issues. Peter and co have great love for Middle-earth and they won't produce a film that's anything less than perfect in their eyes.
Edmond Dantès;38245996 said:A good order to read them is: Silmarillion==>Hobbit==>LOTR. That follows the historical order of the events in Tolkien's legendarium from the creation of the world to the downfall of Sauron and the beginning of the Fourth Age.
If you want more, there's also the Unfinished Tales which isn't a complete narrative, but a collection of extra sub-narratives and essays and rough drafts/analysis.
If you want more in depth analysis, the next step is the History of Middle-earth series which features 12 books. There are some hidden gems of narrative in those books, so they are worth reading, especially Morgoth's Ring.
After that, there's Tolkien's non-Arda related stuff. A few very sweet short stories and poems.
P.S The name of one of the gems in Morgoth's ring is Athrabeth Finrod ah Andreth, it goes into detail about the original corruption of men. It's a frank discussion between an Elf lord and a mortal women.
I'll probably end up seeing in this at the Lincoln Square IMAX in NYC. Since it's a 70mm film theater, will it be shown in 24 fps? I might prefer to see it that way. I'm really not sold on the higher frame rate thing.
There'll both 48fps and 24fps showings and 3d/2d showings by the looks of it.I'll probably end up seeing in this at the Lincoln Square IMAX in NYC. Since it's a 70mm film theater, will it be shown in 24 fps? I might prefer to see it that way. I'm really not sold on the higher frame rate thing.
any impressions on the supposed 4k resolution quality?
A great man. I hope he lives to see the fruits of his labors.
Edmond Dantès;38315021 said:Seems like an extra has confirmed one of the locations that many Tolkien fans have been yearning for. Look at his acting section:
http://www.starnow.co.uk/alexandergrahamreid
Probably going to be featured in the potential prologue or through story flashbacks throughout the film (although that doesn't really seem like Peter's style). We may well be getting quite a detailed origin story of the Dwarves and how they came to be on Middle-earth.
Of course, none of this ever pops up in the actual book so it may well annoy quite a few Tolkien purists.
Edmond Dantès;38315021 said:Seems like an extra has confirmed one of the locations that many Tolkien fans have been yearning for. Look at his acting section:
http://www.starnow.co.uk/alexandergrahamreid
Probably going to be featured in the potential prologue or through story flashbacks throughout the film (although that doesn't really seem like Peter's style). We may well be getting quite a detailed origin story of the Dwarves and how they came to be on Middle-earth.
Of course, none of this ever pops up in the actual book so it may well annoy quite a few Tolkien purists.
Edmond Dantès;38356759 said:Potential spy spot of Dale.
http://www.picvalley.net/v.php?p=u/2753/4560009397586051941337865592771KPlCqUcbErDCaZmgU.JPG
Smaugwhy would dale look so uninhabited?