Pimpbaa
Slop Inspector
DJ_Tet said:Hey if this helps kill MMOs, perhaps I need to rethink this whole thing. Small price to pay to keep that shit on PC imo.
My, aren't we open minded.
DJ_Tet said:Hey if this helps kill MMOs, perhaps I need to rethink this whole thing. Small price to pay to keep that shit on PC imo.
MetatronM said:Unlike the original Xbox, it is now NECESSARY to spend EXTRA money for storage space. Just like with all the iterations of the Playstation and everything else like it, you MUST factor in AT LEAST $40 to be able to, for all intents and purposes, PLAY GAMES, which is something YOU DID NOT HAVE TO DO WITH THE ORIGINAL XBOX. Now you are at $340. An Xbox Live account comes with your empty Xbox. Wonderful, BUT YOU CAN'T USE IT because there is no storage device.
What about all those wonderful things Microsoft promised out of the box, like the wireless controllers? Extra. XBL Marketplace? Extra. Partial backwards compatibility? $100 extra.
Wow. What a great deal. $300 for an X360 disc drive.
jimbo said:I really don't understand all the bitching and moaning. I mean it's $299. THAT IS the standart console. That's what the Xbox was. That's what the PS2 was(without a hard drive might I add)
...Big freaking deal.
Ehh, I dunno. Compared to Xbox launch, it's without a hard drive. Compared to GameCube launch, it's $100 more. Compared to PS2 launch, it's pretty much the same.VALIS said:The pricing seems fine to me, the only thing that seems like a ripoff is the controller is wired in the $300 package. If you're gonna show off your wireless controllers every chance you get, don't switch 'em out at the last minute. Otherwise, you take the 360's base $300 package and compare it every other console launch and the 360 suddenly looks like a great deal.
Now that's just demonstrably false.Drexon said:I like it. $300 for a new console is the shit. It's as cheap as they come
JoshuaJSlone said:Ehh, I dunno. Compared to Xbox launch, it's without a hard drive. Compared to GameCube launch, it's $100 more. Compared to PS2 launch, it's pretty much the same.
Red Scarlet said:I hope Sony and Nintendo don't follow this example.
Musashi Wins! said:I bet they do, which sucks. Given Sony's memory card pricing and Nintendo's shameless Micro pricing, I have very little doubt.
heidern said:The xbox 360 core edition has current gen disc format and no backwards compatibility.
Ryudo said:Too much money for too little return. Seriously fuck the 360, hurry up PS3 and may the "revolution" be stillborn.
cyberheater said:How is $299 too much money for an amazing next gen machine...
cyberheater said:No. I think your thinking about this all wrong. Xbox360 (HDD version) is the standard version and comes with wireless controllers etc..
360 core version is the ultra cut down version for those who don't need/want the extra features.
I'll be getting the full feature version but it's nice to know that folks that don't want to spend that amount can get a cheaper version and still enjoy the great games.
Ryudo said:The only one that looks next gen and compareable to the PS3 tech demos (supposedly realtime) is Gears of war and maybe PGR 3.
Jewbacca said:Does anyone think that prior to the PS3 Launch MS will go to one SKU (being the old 399 price) and dump it down to 299? or perhaps 20 dollars under ps3?
trmas said:Yeah sure.. Anyone who defends this is a moron. MS blew it with this stupid 2 SKU business.
DUH, but they require a HD.DopeyFish said:you only need a silver account for mmorpgs.
Waiting for what? You're going to get the same thing for the same price then... and if you're concerned about money, rest assured that the 360 will be $50 - $100 cheaper then the ps3 at it's launch.Geek said:Now that I've had time to think more about SKUgate, I'm pretty happy with the pricing scheme. Why? Because they assuredly priced me out of the Xbox 360 ownership game for a long time. I was afraid I'd succumb to launch hype and buy into it, but with the current tiered structure, I'm out and waiting on Rev and PS3 instead.
ATJaguarX said:Waiting for what? You're going to get the same thing for the same price then... and if you're concerned about money, rest assured that the 360 will be $50 - $100 cheaper then the ps3 at it's launch.
ATJaguarX said:So... keep saving those pennies Geek.
ATJaguarX said:Why include all the HD when a great number of people don't want it and
cyberheater said:Has the no backward compatibility for core been confirmed yet?
Stinkles said:Great argument!
Wrong thread.
This thread is specifically supposed to be for people to comment on the positive aspects of the 360 pricing - value for money etc. If you don't like it there are a million other fuckin threads.
360 fans must know how it feels to be Nintendo fans the last couple of days, although I have to say, the Nintendo hate is usually served up with a scoop of condescending affection. The latent 360 rage in this thread is baffling. So many folks popped out of the woodwork with agendas.
Anyway, $400, I'm in. Do I wish it was $300? DUH.
NWO said:http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/08/17/news_6131245.html
The 360 gets two spins: the $299 non-backwards compatible "Core System" and the $399 package with 20GB HD, controller, headset, HD cables, and remote control.
Microsoft has confirmed that the "Core System" will not be backwards compatible out-of-the-box. In order to play current-generation Xbox games, owners of the bare-bones system will have to purchase the detachable hard drive. It is unclear whether or not backwards compatibility will work with the smaller-capacity 64MB memory cards.
cyberheater said:Thanks. I kinda thought that it would be the case. Still. It's good to have the choice.
IJoel said:Now, let's be fair.
I do think $400 for the premium pack is a very nice compromise.
But I despise the split userbase and the ridiculous price gouging on the accessories. It completely overshadows any positives on the announcements.
This is coming from a big big Xbox fan. It has been my favorite console this generation. I loved all the value I got from MS this generation, but it seems they're going the opposite direction and it's quite disappointing for someone that has supported them.
Future said:Exactly. $399 is not bad. Not bad at all.
The $299 pack is really either $340 with memory card or $399 (!) with Hard drive because you gotta save your games.
Jewbacca said:Does anyone think that prior to the PS3 Launch MS will go to one SKU (being the old 399 price) and dump it down to 299? or perhaps 20 dollars under ps3?
ATJaguarX said:Waiting for what? You're going to get the same thing for the same price then... and if you're concerned about money, rest assured that the 360 will be $50 - $100 cheaper then the ps3 at it's launch.
Goreomedy said:"Angry about the value of the core version? Shut up and drop $400!"
But... what if everyone has that idea on launch day, and the only thing left on the shelf is a core version with shitty AV cables and a tethered controller? I'll then have to drop close to $200 more to match what my flaunting fucks for friends have. THIS is Microsoft's plan. Ream the hardcores who can't manage to find a bundle, and cushion the blow of hardware loss with sickeningly overpriced peripherals. I'm on to you Gates! I'm on to you!
mrklaw said:hey MS, fuck off with your £50 games.
By all means raise the price in the US, but in the UK PS2 and Xbox games are discounted regularly to £30, so X360 back at the normal price of £40 is still effectively a price hike. I'm not buying much at 50-fucking-quid