VisceralBowl
Member
They're probably updated it.
to 8.5
Too clean. Not filmic. Still too hard. Too many choices in menu.
5
They're probably updated it.
to 8.5
Do you really think they'll do another full review for it or just maybe update their old review?
Missing shadow on the wall mounted camera breaks immersion, it looks too 'gamey' now, and Joel's still a dick.They're probably updated it.
to 8.5
Better graphics, still too hard. Too many choices in menu.
lolStill too dark and depressing.Drop to 6.5 for not adding cloud cuckoo land level.
Too clean. Not filmic. Still too hard. Too many choices in menu.
5
Missing shadow on the wall mounted camera breaks immersion, it looks too 'gamey' now, and Joel's still a dick.
6.5
Let it be known that I am the first person to earn the Grounded, Survivor, Hard, and Normal Trophies for this game.
I am also the only person, as of the time of this person, to earn the Grounded Trophy.
http://psnprofiles.com/trophy/2752-The-Last-of-Us-Remastered/49-Completed-Grounded-Mode
http://psnprofiles.com/trophy/2752-The-Last-of-Us-Remastered/16-No-Matter-What-Survivor
http://psnprofiles.com/trophy/2752-The-Last-of-Us-Remastered/15-No-Matter-What-Hard
http://psnprofiles.com/trophy/2752-The-Last-of-Us-Remastered/14-No-Matter-What-Normal
Sorry, it just feels good to be first at something
Do you really think they'll do another full review for it or just maybe update their old review?
hahahaToo clean. Not filmic. Still too hard. Too many choices in menu.
5
Really debating hard on this one. Normally don't replay too many games due to my massive backlog, but I loved this game and the Gamestop deal has me teetering on the edge. Ugh.
Right. And since it's just an update it's Phil reviewing it again. He won't change his mind or admit he's wrong so as I see it, it goes one of two ways. 1) The score is raised likely .5 (maybe 1.0) for the enhanced presentation and increased playability and because most people at Polygon think 7.5 was the wrong score to give it. Or 2) its score remains the same (maybe .5 less??) because it's the same game Phil didn't like the first time, only a year older and less impressive. I'm leaning toward option #1.
thereitis.gif
Oh my god, my Amazon copy shipped. Cannot contain excitement anymore. Quick someone show me some blocky shadows!
Lol! How about some quotes from their recent remaster preview
http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/16/5902983/the-last-of-us-remastered-ps4-preview-graphics
The Last of Us is a stunning visual masterpiece.
Naughty Dog's The Last of Us Remastered, which launches July 29 on PS4, looks to be the definitive version of one of the best games of 2013.
6.5 confirmed
So I see everyone talking shit about polygon and I'm just wondering why. I've never really followed them. I'm on my phone so I don't really wanna look up anything. Anyone care to share why there's so much hate?
Too clean. Not filmic. Still too hard. Too many choices in menu.
5
Written by: Samit Sarkar
Unless it's written by Phil Kollar or Arthur Gies, I don't see too much changing. Most the staff loved TLOU. Like most of the population.
So I see everyone talking shit about polygon and I'm just wondering why. I've never really followed them. I'm on my phone so I don't really wanna look up anything. Anyone care to share why there's so much hate?
Polygon has great editorials, well written and fairly impartial news, awesome and original video content, and hilarious personalities (Justin and Griffin mainly). However, their reviews are led by Arthur Gies, noted MS-obsessive, and have had some unsavory scores and content for certain games.
Polygon has great editorials, well written and fairly impartial news, awesome and original video content, and hilarious personalities (Justin and Griffin mainly). However, their reviews are led by Arthur Gies, noted MS-obsessive, and have had some unsavory scores and content for certain games.
During the Besties section for GoTY 2013, The Polygon panel practically admitted that their scoring for TLoU was wrong.
It'll probably be a 9 this time round, with a retrospective look on how Joel is now an awesome character because reasons.
I would say that Gies's problem is that he has pre-defined biases and preferences that makes him very critical on some aspects of some games, and then flagrantly overlook other aspects because he thinks it doesn't matter.
Like Forza 5's review, and how he thinks the lack of content doesn't matter because the game is fun, there's enough cars, and who gives a shit about the Nurb? Enough tracks for your regular racing fan. Content is probably the 2nd most important thing in a racing game behind the core mechanics ( physics, handling, etc), so I don't know why he decides that it doesn't matter for Forza 5 because it's fun.
Not "practically". Justin opened TLOU talk by saying (paraphrasing) "Let's just get it out of the way: our TLOU score was wrong. It was wrong, okay? I think we can admit that."
However, Justin is not Reviews Editor. And none of the Besties reviewed TLOU or are doing the Review Update. Arthur Gies is Reviews Editor. And Philip Kollar is doing the Review Update.
So while I think the score will improve slightly, I don't think we'll see any turnaround. Look at what Phil's been saying on twitter. He hasn't changed his mind about TLOU.
I followed Gies on Twitter for a while but he really came across as a self important, pompous douchebag. One of those people who is never willing to admit he might be wrong on something. IMO he is about the worst person to have as a reviews editor.
I see. I've always thought reviews were kinda bizarre with how they handled the actual scores. 10's should really only be reserved for perfection. And there's very very few games deserving of 10's. 7.5 does seem low though.They (Phil kollar) gave the game a 7.5 when virtually every outlet gave 9s and 10s.
You can see why all the "hate".
There. You're a real Member now, David.
There are no perfect games, reserving ten for perfect seems absurd.I see. I've always thought reviews were kinda bizarre with how they handled the actual scores. 10's should really only be reserved for perfection. And there's very very few games deserving of 10's. 7.5 does seem low though.
Meh. Looking forward to it though.
He enjoyed Left Behind more than the main game. That alone might raise the score a bit.Right. And since it's just an update it's Phil reviewing it again. He won't change his mind or admit he's wrong so as I see it, it goes one of two ways. 1) The score is raised likely .5 (maybe 1.0) for the enhanced presentation and increased playability and because most people at Polygon think 7.5 was the wrong score to give it. Or 2) its score remains the same (maybe .5 less??) because it's the same game Phil didn't like the first time, only a year older and less impressive. I'm leaning toward option #1.
There are no perfect games, reserving ten for perfect seems absurd.
He enjoyed Left Behind more than the main game. That alone might raise the score a bit.
So what are you guys gonna do...
30FPS or 60FPS?!
Um; we're trying to complain about reviews here. Can we not? It's not the time to get sidetracked by relevant discussion.
Um; we're trying to complain about reviews here. Can we not? Now is not the time to get sidetracked by relevant discussion.
Oh my mistake, of course not.
*ahem*
POLYGON TO UPDATE SCORE TO 7.6, etc. etc.
I would say that Gies's problem is that he has pre-defined biases and preferences that makes him very critical on some aspects of some games, and then flagrantly overlook other aspects because he thinks it doesn't matter.
Like Forza 5's review, and how he thinks the lack of content doesn't matter because the game is fun, there's enough cars, and who gives a shit about the Nurb? Enough tracks for your regular racing fan. Content is probably the 2nd most important thing in a racing game behind the core mechanics ( physics, handling, etc), so I don't know why he decides that it doesn't matter for Forza 5 because it's fun.
I had no problem with their score, I don't think games 'deserve' anything, it's all about how it's received by the reviewer, it was just funny because everyone believed Polygon were in MS's pocket, and when Sony drop their generation defining masterpiece, Polygon give it a way below the curve score.
The score should remain what it was, or Kollar is spineless, revisionist or incompetent.
Not "practically". Justin opened TLOU talk by saying (paraphrasing) "Let's just get it out of the way: our TLOU score was wrong. It was wrong, okay? I think we can admit that."
However, Justin is not Reviews Editor. And none of the Besties reviewed TLOU or are doing the Review Update. Arthur Gies is Reviews Editor. And Philip Kollar is doing the Review Update.
So while I think the score will improve slightly, I don't think we'll see any turnaround. Look at what Phil's been saying on twitter. He hasn't changed his mind about TLOU.
30fps (with better shadows): 7.6/10
60fps: 7.4/10