The Last of Us - Review Thread [Emargo up, scores in OP.]

Status
Not open for further replies.

DatDude

Banned
I'm sorry, but I don't know ANY gaming review outlet that could be considered "credible" review outlets. You could find some shady shit that all of them have done before and/or games they have vastly overrated if you really looked into it.

For example, let us take away the Polygon review. Let us say they did in fact give the game a 10. Where would all the focus be? On Gamespot. And we would have the same exact posts except with "Polygon" replaced by "Gamespot" and some added complaints involving Jeff Gerstmann, Kane & Lynch, 8.8 Twilight Princess, and whatever "mediocre" games they gave a 8 or above.

Any review site who changes the score of the game on the fly is not a credible site.
 

Sn4ke_911

If I ever post something in Japanese which I don't understand, please BAN me.
2013-06-0518_26_00-twmyuj4.png
 

Cosmozone

Member
Went to the Wikipedia page to look up release date info and glanced at the summary text.

Got the plot spoiled in the first sentence (i think).

Don't go to the wikipedia page people.
Wow, that's awful. Sorry for you. One more reason to blackout this thing.
 

deformity

Neo Member
Seems that today an Italian website broke the embargo, coming out with this:
http://i.imgur.com/0woOnjk.jpg

They retired the review, then some hours later...
http://i.imgur.com/QAFvRlg.jpg

I don't know if it's true or fake, but in the first case I would not surprised: most of the videogame 'journalists' in my country are monkeys without ethics and guts. And people like this deserve 365 days per year of shitstorm.

it's only a fake trolling by forum mods to overhype users.
 

Sothpaw

Member
After being totally underwhelmed by Uncharted 2 I'm not sure I should be fooled into getting this. Review scores are completely useless now. I'll watch some people play on youtube to be sure it's not Uncharted with zombies.
 

Loudninja

Member
Sure. Not enough time with multiplayer and big restrictions on footage as well to cobble a full review. Also, 'cause you know we want to spoil it when you find out the whole game takes place in the matrix.

More seriously, it's an amazing game that's more so more not being an overly innovative one. Naughty Dog has often been good at refinement, but here the various systems are familiar but chord into an interesting way, with expert pacing, characters and scenarios that stay fresh throughout.

I get echoes of Half-Life 2 from the linear-but-wide level structure, and world building. It's not perfect and I don't really believe a 10 means perfection either. I also get echoes of when I played Half-Life 1 with it's slow, blurring lead in. I had read the hype back in 1998 and was wondering when the game was going to get good, and hours in, I realized it had been amazing the whole time. In the same way, TLOU doesn't really start until 2 hours in, but that's not because of cutscenes and tutorials, it's just good storytelling, game design, and hard-won marriage between the two.
sounds amazing.
 

web01

Member
People should not buy into the reviews and hype until actual average people get their hands on the game this could be an Uncharted 3 situation all over again.
 
That seems to be the one.

Yes it's in their pros & cons on the last page

Thanks guys. I read this Review before and asked myself what ending he was talking about because I only read something about the beginning of the game. What the hell is wrong with Maniac anyway. In one of their TLOU previews they published informations straight out from their asses and now they spoil the beginning which is not even allowed because of NDA.
 
The problem I see with most of these reviews is that they don't praise the game mechanics beyond a simple "they work AMAZINGLY". It seems like a game with a strong initial playthrough, but if those game mechanics aren't enjoyable by themselves, it won't have a ton of replay value, like the uncharted games.
 

BossLackey

Gold Member
The thing about the controversial 7.5 is that at the end of the day, these are people trying to slap a number on something that is highly subjective and not quantifiable in the first place. It seems like Polygon is trying to (on some of their reviews, including this one) place an accurate number taking into account all flaws and the fact that a 10 should literally be a perfect game. In my opinion, there's no point in doing that if 10 is unattainable. Their mindset stands apart from those at other reviewers, but I feel like they will eventually join the herd just as everyone else did. One by one. Still, regardless of their intentions, the inconsistency in their reviews gives them little credibility in the first place.
 
I'm allergic to hype over narrative-based games. Too much disappointment there. But it seems this is getting good gameplay reviews as well. This could very well be the first new console game for me in a looong time.
 

Burger

Member
Or buy a PS3? It's not like the PS4 is BC, so there's no overlap.

And get Demon's Souls while you're at it.

I could play Dk Souls on my 360...

I'll take the chance this comes out on PS4 later. I'm not dropping £160 bones on a PS3 for 1 game.
 

Boss Man

Member
That sure is something lol.

GameSpot's 8 sits fine with me. Polygon just keeps making it more and more apparent that there's something going on behind the curtain to me.

Is there even proof that Polygon gets money from MS? o_O
Pretty sure they got like a quarter million just as they were starting. Don't really need proof because eventually they admitted it.
 

Toma

Let me show you through these halls, my friend, where treasures of indie gaming await...
I'm sorry, but I don't know ANY gaming review outlet that could be considered "credible" review outlets. You could find some shady shit that all of them have done before and/or games they have vastly overrated if you really looked into it.

For example, let us take away the Polygon review. Let us say they did in fact give the game a 10. Where would all the focus be? On Gamespot. And we would have the same exact posts except with "Polygon" replaced by "Gamespot" and some added complaints involving Jeff Gerstmann, Kane & Lynch, 8.8 Twilight Princess, and whatever "mediocre" games they gave a 8 or above.

As I said earlier, you are talking to me when replying to me and I would consider a Gamespot 7.5 way more credible than a Polygon one. You can believe me or not, but we dont have much ground for discussion if you dont. I am not pissed about the Polygon score itself, I am pissed about Polygon. They are basically shit mountain for the past few months now, with Gies being the most annoying person in focus. Every reviewing outlet made mistakes, and its good they get called out on it, but personally, I havent been as vocal about the credibility of a single website other than Kotaku (to a lesser extent lately) and Polygon.
 
The problem I see with most of these reviews is that they don't praise the game mechanics beyond a simple "they work AMAZINGLY". It seems like a game with a strong initial playthrough, but if those game mechanics aren't enjoyable by themselves, it won't have a ton of replay value, like the uncharted games.

If you played the demo like the rest of us, you would've known that we all praised the gameplay and it's myriad ways of dealing with enemies and that the mechanics work smoothly, namely melees, shooting and crafting in game.

As for Uncharted not having replay value, that's on you buddy. I completed UC2 about 5 times.
 

prwxv3

Member
The problem I see with most of these reviews is that they don't praise the game mechanics beyond a simple "they work AMAZINGLY". It seems like a game with a strong initial playthrough, but if those game mechanics aren't enjoyable by themselves, it won't have a ton of replay value, like the uncharted games.

I thought they explained why the were good pretty well
 

Pranay

Member
I think ill leave my now but i think that polygon stuff happen from both the side - people who were acting like blind fanboys and people who wanted to see the meltdowns.

If people were really interested in having a good discussion thread , they should have tried changing the topic rather then just quoting and hoping for more meltdowns.
 

rashbeep

Banned
That sure is something lol.

GameSpot's 8 sits fine with me. Polygon just keeps making it more and more apparent that there's something going on behind the curtain to me.

Maybe there is, maybe there isn't. Why does it matter? It won't hamper your enjoyment of the game in any way, will it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom