bighugeguns
Gold Member
The fuck are you talking about?
GymWolf
Gold Member
Of course he would, he is like a 85 years old dude, everything that doesn't look like a mummy is gravy for him, he probably has a crush for the chick in orange aswell
Last edited:
GooseMan69
Member
I ain't coping with shit. Tsushima really did nothing for me. You can't even skip the fucking cutscenes. And I'm tired of the samurai surge in games, especially played out revenge tales, on top of all of the politics involved with this one.
And I got a backlog of much better stuff to play. Fuck dude I haven't even really touched Expedition yet
"I ain't coping with shit"
Proceeds to cope.
I didn't say generic. I said it's not industry changing in it genre
But if you want specifics, almost everything about its battle system with the dodge, counterattacks, parries, action prompts to pull off attacks, use of items to augment attacks and effects in battle, puzzle mechanics in boss fights. All of that stuff is found in Paper Mario 1/2 and Mario and Luigi 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
You can't call something industry changing in its genre when games in that genre literally did all of that stuff already.
The annoying thing about E33 fans is they like to pretend that game invented its battle system or that it pushes the genre in ways it hasn't been before. Neither of those things are true. It can be a great game but also be an iterative game at the same time, and that's okay. And it IS a great game and it IS iterative.
Last edited:
owandeseis
Member
Curiously, with that game as soon as i saw some reviewers i follow sometimes, i could tell the game was a masterpiece that would be remembered as one of the best games from it's decade.
Meanwhile with this game i'm seeing several people saying mentioning it's outdated open world and quests/events mechanics, similar to the first entry.
Not paying full price for this game so i won't have my own opinion soon, but i'm curious about the customers opinions after a month or so, the trend this gen for Sony has been better reviews from media and worse from buyers on the sequels, would be surprised if it wasn't the same on this case.
Fabieter
Member
Ghost of Yotey after reviews.
Actually reading the reviews its not that good, but numbers are pretty high yes.
Topher
Identifies as young
Fabieter
Member
This is like saying botw isnt genere defining because the individual aspects were done before. Wtf.
Last edited:
Chuck Berry
Gold Member
If you honestly think what I'm saying is coping, you're officially my Retard For The Day. Stand up and take a bow after you go get a salad bowl cut. Congrats!
Last edited:
Your whataboutism does not elicit a further response.
Chuck Berry
Gold Member
Last edited:
BigBeauford
Member
People are quick to forget Spiderman 2 was a 90 metacritic.
graywolf323
Gold Member
how a lot of the posts in here read
edit: especially since no one here has played the game yet
Last edited:
near
Gold Member
Is it just coping because it reviewed well, even though they didn't enjoy the first game? Not everyone makes purchasing choices based on reviews.
Fabieter
Member
Do what you want. Your point was just stupid to shit on the best game of the year though. Leave it at that.
Not any more, bruh.
Hades II Reviews
In Hades II, you'll battle beyond the Underworld using dark sorcery as you take on the sinister Titan of Time in an all-new, action-packed, endlessly replayable experience rooted in the Underworld of Greek myth and its deep connections to the dawn of witchcraft. As Melinoe, the immortal...
www.metacritic.com
And thats okay. E33 is a great game, it doesnt need to win a meaningless award to justify its greatness. But if you base your identity around E33 being universally acclaimed as the savior of JRPGs and unanimously regarded as GotY, well I just feel bad for you.
For the record, I only made this post because you're annoying and I wanted to be an ass. I won't reply to this anymore because I don't want to further derail the thread.
Last edited:
![[Sigma]](/data/avatars/m/701/701747.jpg?1726376545){kind=avatar}
[Sigma]
Member
Fabieter
Member
Not any more, bruh.
Hades II Reviews
In Hades II, you'll battle beyond the Underworld using dark sorcery as you take on the sinister Titan of Time in an all-new, action-packed, endlessly replayable experience rooted in the Underworld of Greek myth and its deep connections to the dawn of witchcraft. As Melinoe, the immortal...
And thats okay. E33 is a great game, it doesnt need to win a meaningless award to justify its greatness. But if you base your identity around E33 being universally acclaimed as the savior of JRPGs and unanimously regarded as GotY, well I just feel bad for you.
Its still gonna win game of the year.
Like rdr 2 lost to gow despite having better reviews.
Raven117
Member
Meh, for as brilliant as the open world is, and the great story, to me, and I'm betting many others, the minute to minute gameplay is tedious as fuck.
And E33 is fucking awesome. Game of the generation for me. Lots of elements came together in way that was stronger than the sum of its parts.
Now, why are we talking about these again in a Ghost review thread?
Last edited:
Minari
Member
No it wont. Best indie and even that is questionable.
Fabieter
Member
What do you think is gonna win?
Minari
Member
Goty clair Obscur exp 33 but best indie its between silksong and hades 2.
I just think new IPs that blew everyone away have a higher chance of winning over SAFE sequels.
The sequels that won in the last 10 years blew everything out the water in that year
(tlou2 and baldurs gate 3 tho i dont even consider bg3 a sequel since the ip has been dead for decades)
Only exception for me is the witcher 3 because Bloodborne exists in the same year which went on to win the old neogaf goty. Witcher 3 only on bc actual AMATEUR JOURNOLISTS were picked to make the choice so Bloodborne never had a chance.
Fact is Bloodborne shits on Witcher 3 from the highest Mountain!
I got over 900 h in it on ps5 so i am abit biased lol
Fabieter
Member
Well I agree.