Trump has some things to say tonight
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2...onfronted-him-about-sexism-was-on-her-period/
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2...onfronted-him-about-sexism-was-on-her-period/
The only Latinos voting for Rubio are Cubans. Mexicans ain't fucking with Rubio.
Trump has some things to say tonight
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2...onfronted-him-about-sexism-was-on-her-period/
He stated that juuust obtusely enough to explain it away if pressed on it. I'm always concerned that his bombastic comments will go one step too far and kill the momentum, but it seems like he could call people with cancer losers and it would boost his polls presently. For the sake of the country & supreme court nominations & down-ticket races, I hope Trump sticks around to muddy the waters at least to the end of the year.
Lack of competition and the electoral map.What makes Hilary so such a good option I always see everyone say hilary has such a lockdown on this but what says that?
Gonna hit a few points covered across this thread:
1. Trump ain't nothing to worry about for the Ds. His unfavorables are absurd with most of the population. He turns lean right voters into hard left votes, hence why HRC beats him in a recent poll done in Kentucky. Fucking KENTUCKY. He gets the extreme right fringe out in droves though, and the Tea Party has turned that into the dominant force in the primaries.
2. Sanders is not Obama. Hell, Obama isn't/wasn't Obama. He was a valid candidate to be sure who got early traction with a strong showing in Iowa, but what really did Clinton (and McCain) in was that Obama's campaign was literally a decade ahead of the field in utilizing social media to rally voters, organize voting pools and, most importantly, extract funding. His outreach machine was unprecedented across the globe. It is now effectively being rolled over to HRC, I'm sure as some sort of horsetrading for Bill Clinton's ardent public support and campaigning last election.
3. Where did this "Hillary has no personality" bullshit come from? She has always been a unique, charismatic individual. She's a damn good interview, whether that is on the Daily Show/Colbert where it's superficial politics and jokes or in a hard hitting political wonk session with the more "serious" journalists. Her campaign is going to get about a year of negative/attack ad free play before the general to mend her negatives that do not stem from a lack of personality, they stem from the fact that when it comes to politics she's a cold, calculating, strategist who knows what she is doing 99% of the time. Basically, she's the HBIC but nobody actually likes the HBIC, they just respect the game. They'll soften that image before any rich white guy from the GOP starts lobbing grenades at her, and then much of it will look like angry white man syndrome run amok.
4. The best strategy the GOP has is Kasich/Rubio as POTUS/VP. The other way doesn't work because Rubio is still wet behind the ears and made a flat out statement last night that HRC's resume trounces the GOP field. Kasich has governor credentials, is moderate enough to not alienate the massive middle swath of voters, and would pull Ohio red. Rubio helps with hispanics and pulls Florida their way as well. That is the GOP ticket with a chance, but it's looking more and more like Kasich is going to get slapped down by the John Huntsman Effect (i.e. moderates and lefties consider him pallet-able, so GOP primary voters just assume he's awful).
5. People seriously under-estimate the "first woman president" pull HRC is going to get, or the bounce she'll see from older democrats who secretly didn't want to pull the lever for a black guy with a weird name. If you think black voter turnout is going to decline shortly after cops have been murdering black kids in the streets of most major metropolitan areas while the GOP claps from the sidelines you're fucking high.
Everything is queued up, HRC and Bill are too damn good on the big stage and this time she's running effectively unopposed. They didn't see the coming of social media as a major political force. Obama and Axelrod did. That is the one time they've ever been tripped up. You're talking about a couple who took Jeb's daddy's job when he was the sitting POTUS on the heels of St. Ronnie and actually had the country headed on a decent enough path. They live for that Red v. Blue chess match.
Trump has disavowed his position on single payer. He wants to go backwards to the old system essentially.I want single-payer healthcare. Is that what you're talking about? I want it whether it's Trump or Sanders advocating it. I'm not sure I understand the OP.
Some small part of me wants to see what will happen to this country if Trump somehow magically becomes president.
What makes Hilary so such a good option I always see everyone say hilary has such a lockdown on this but what says that?
Trump supporters are cray cray but they are not the majority by any means.
I mean, America ain't perfect but it's not >50% of this:
![]()
Trump supporters are cray cray but they are not the majority by any means.
I mean, America ain't perfect but it's not >50% of this:
![]()
Amazing. He just gave up on the last three letters. 😂
Some small part of me wants to see what will happen to this country if Trump somehow magically becomes president.
Pretty sure that shirt is mocking trump fans
Megyn Kelly crashed and burned.
The audience was cheering and laughing during the Rosie thing because they recognized her misogyny question for what it was - a lame PC "gotcha" moment that no one gives a fuck about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP6S3KE2DaI
As a distant foreigner expectator I can relate to this.Some small part of me wants to see what will happen to this country if Trump somehow magically becomes president.
I know Americans will say they want a viable third party but does it really count if the third party is actually worse?A vote for Trump is a vote for third party viability.
Vote Trump.
Which left are you talking about? There's barely any left in the US. Obama and Hillary would be considered far right in Sweden.
Why? Climate change, foreign policy, Supreme Court justices and unraveling the social safety nets aren't exactly things I am cool with just for some LOL's.
Okay, now I need to know: what's considered "far left" in Sweden?
At least his daughter is pretty good looking.
![]()
![]()
Judging from how hard Bush tried to screw it up and failed, and how hard Obama tried to fix it and failed, I would say not a whole lot would happen. People really think the President has more power than he does.
Arnold's stint as the Governator of California was notable for how uneventful it was. I would hardly think Trump's hypothetical Presidency would be that interesting either for the same reason Arnold's Governating was, the actual career politicians mostly ignored Arnold and fought among themselves as usual. Trump as President would have the same effect, with no political experience to speak of he would be unable to direct his party in any meaningful capacity and Congress would just spend 4 years being completely gridlocked.
Judging from how hard Bush tried to screw it up and failed.
All I want for Christmas as a leftie is a viable alternative to Hillary. I really don't know if I'll vote in the general.
Trump is an openly racist and misogynist piece of garbage. He's not going to steal many votes at all on the left if he runs in the general.
But he's making waves on the right, and raising a shitload of uncomfortable questions for them.
No, but do you think she'll likable enough for a majority of Americans to vote her over Trump, or Rubio?
Those words are thrown around a bit too easily these days.
"Illegal Mexican immigrants are rapists" and "that woman only disliked me because she was on her period." are pretty much as racist and misogynistic as you can get?
Nah you are just being too PC.
/s
Those words are thrown around a bit too easily these days.
"Illegal Mexican immigrants are rapists" and "that woman only disliked me because she was on her period." are pretty much as racist and misogynistic as you can get?
The statements(paraphrased) can arguably be construed as such, arguably.
Does it a person make? No.
This applies to everyone, everyone.
Pretty sure Trump doesn't have any actual policies beyond building a wall.
Pretty sure Trump doesn't have any actual policies beyond building a wall.
It makes him a person willing to make a joke that implied we shouldn't take Megyn Kelly seriously because she is a woman and may have been on her period. This is a man who routinely brags about how powerful he is and how many people he employs. I really don't think it's overly politically correct to say that is an inappropriate combination. He could have defended himself by saying his insults are mostly not gender based, and that he has no shame insulting men, but instead he turned it into a "hur dur period" joke.
It's a lack of class; a trashy not really funny or "fun" joke as Trump would defend himself with.
The statements(paraphrased) can arguably be construed as such, arguably.
Does it a person make? No.
This applies to everyone, everyone.
But a joke is a joke.
Don't worry, I won't because the comparison holds no waterDon't read too far into this ... but Ronald Reagan was full of vapid, silly opinions, but lots and lots of zingers and charisma.
Donald Trump has made racist and misogynist statements. When called on those statements, he has not reflected, recanted, or apologized for them. In fact, judging by last night's debate, he stands by them firemly.
What is the magical line when you'd call someone sexist personally? Or is no one ever sexist to you?
Ah. Huh. Interesting.
Word was misogynist. Not sexist.