Yeah, its best to not care. Personally if I want amateur reviews I always find the impressions threads and OT the best way to do that. It can get a bit funny because obviously the more you're posting you're likely to be a fan of the game but what negative opinions are there to have about this game? Seemingly none.Gee, I'm naive enough in thinking some of these "user" reviews are actually amateur reviewers that received a copy. If that's not the case I'll take it back.
I need more coffee, thinking is too hard.
Wii U in 2014, nuff' said. How can people expect games on that console at the time seriously making a dent onto public perception. Sure, they got great scores, but if "no one" (quotation marks!) plays them for themselves and is left with what we got, then of course the year in review will look pretty bland for most. This goes also for niche PC RPGs and the likes. For a year to go down in history or even be recognized as great by the majority of people, there have to be at least a few memorable heavy hitters that hit the mainstream. So, I think that is the reason why people keep saying that.
Blows my mind that there are so many people who've never played a Zelda game before. I guess Nintendo hasn't really been relevant for almost a decade but still, Zelda is like, the grandmother of gaming.
If you don't give anything a ten on some strange principle, then you're just operating on a nine point scale where your nine is the equivalent of everyone else's ten and should be considered a 100% score. There is no objective score by which to measure games. All reviews can only ever be comparative - how enjoyable is this compared to other experiences? If BotW leads the field in that respect, even in the face of framerate drops, that is a 10 (for that reviewer).
If you don't give anything a ten on some strange principle, then you're just operating on a nine point scale where your nine is the equivalent of everyone else's ten and should be considered a 100% score. There is no objective score by which to measure games. All reviews can only ever be comparative - how enjoyable is this compared to other experiences? If BotW leads the field in that respect, even in the face of framerate drops, that is a 10 (for that reviewer).
The number of 0 ratings is astounding. User review rating now down to 7.7
Your tears are deliciousJust an observation or call it my opinion... the mostly middle aged 30 year old men playing this game living out nostalgia in front of their eyes see these same inconsistencies in other games and take away points in reviews. But because the name "Zelda" is tied to it... I feel like the hyperbole and myopic vision is just way too much.
No game is perfect.
The number of 0 ratings is astounding. User review rating now down to 7.7
But a 10 isn't perfect. Just like a 5/5 movie isn't perfect. The scale is 1-10. Does the game hit what it needs to to receive the highest score? As the poster you quoted said.. if someone "never gives a 10", then really they are only operating on a 9 point scale and their 9 is still a 10 anyway.There is not one game in my library of the 25+ years of gaming that is a 10... perfection is also subjective for many. I can't talk for anyone else. What matters is the experience and journey. I've been blown away by games like Shadow of the Colossus to LOZ: The Minish Cap with their interesting narratives or contextual worlds but they are confined by the limitations of:
a) their hardware
b) limited set of actions
Whether the choice of these limited set of actions is a caveat to the creator's imagination is another story... I take them as they are.
Anyway, I guess I'm treading towards extreme idealism where the A.I. has extremely intelligent beings and the physicality of the world mirrors ours (with the creator's own creativity, reality and context thrown in).
Although I really liked Bloodborne, I had no idea of its story narrative which although builds up the mystery of the game also took away from it. Also the ambient occlusion is horrible.
An opinion opposite to yours sir, is not nonsense. I have yet to play the 2 best games out now as an example and will reserve judgement when I do play them. But for those who do have these games have fun my friends!
The number of 0 ratings is astounding. User review rating now down to 7.7
9gag has always been a cesspool, and, dare I say, worse than YouTube.Since when did 9gag comments become as bad as youtube comments?
Are you really that shocked? I'm sure tons of people were just chomping at the bit to drag the Zelda user meta down.
so what happens when DualShockers changed their review score after the update patch from 9.5 to 10?
does metacritic update too?
No, they don't change scores in metacritic.
This really doesn't make sense. Did these people openly say Zelda was better in those reviews? Seems more like something XBox One console warriors would do, not Zelda fans.And just like MC did with all the Nintendo trolls giving HZD a 0, those will get removed.
9gag has always been a cesspool, and, dare I say, worse than YouTube.
I only have one question to you:Just an observation or call it my opinion... the mostly middle aged 30 year old men playing this game living out nostalgia in front of their eyes see these same inconsistencies in other games and take away points in reviews. But because the name "Zelda" is tied to it... I feel like the hyperbole and myopic vision is just way too much.
No game is perfect.
You should read the post you quoted more closely. He said Nintendo hardware stopped being relevant for most people, but their software is generally top-notch. Even Starfox (though a good game apparently if you invest in the control scheme) is an outlier. Their software output has consistently been stellar - which is true. Nintendo has never been irrelevant in the games development space and your issues are hardware related.Nintendo stopped being relevant with their WiiU, which was a disaster. Only 14 Million units sold over all. Look at Starfox on the WiiU it was widely criticized for its bad controls, Nintendo wanted it gimmicky and still thought that people would enjoy the experience. They built games around the control scheme, look at skyward sword, it sold badly, not because it was a bad game but because they pushed motion controls on it, just to have them.
When they developed Breath of the Wild they realized that they didn't even need the WiiU Gamepad for it, they realized this game would work just fine without any "LOOK AT THE CONTROLLER" Signs on your TV like many WiiU Games have. With the switch Nintendo is finally back to the roots, they won't mess up their main titles anymore, Mario Odyssey will most likely work without any gimmicky controls.
They still have their motion control Wii-Mote lookalikes with the two switch controllers but they will use them for dedicated software like 1-2-Switch rather than on their main IPs. We are finally cured of Motion Controls pestering great Nintendo Games.
Also: Nintendo is bold now, they understand that they can be successful if they reinvent the genres a new, like they did with Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time. The Nintendo we see now is the one that created some of the best 3D games back in the N64 days that still pass the test of time. -Too bad the old Rare isn't hanging around to join the party
Further proving that the user score in these sorts of things is utterly worthless. Without some sort of purchaser verified system, there's no need for user scores.
And just like MC did with all the Nintendo trolls giving HZD a 0, those will get removed.
This really doesn't make sense. Did these people openly say Zelda was better in those reviews? Seems more like something XBox One console warriors would do, not Zelda fans.
Let's be honest here; Nintendo sought out to try and copy Horizon, but ended up doing nothing of the sort. This can hardly be called a copy since it's more flawed in every single way.
This really doesn't make sense. Did these people openly say Zelda was better in those reviews? Seems more like something XBox One console warriors would do, not Zelda fans.
It's cuz of he hardware bro...I haven't gotten a Nintendo console since I put my Wii away in the closet after 2 months of use.Blows my mind that there are so many people who've never played a Zelda game before. I guess Nintendo hasn't really been relevant for almost a decade but still, Zelda is like, the grandmother of gaming.
You're using difficult words for a ten year old, impressive.Just an observation or call it my opinion... the mostly middle aged 30 year old men playing this game living out nostalgia in front of their eyes see these same inconsistencies in other games and take away points in reviews. But because the name "Zelda" is tied to it... I feel like the hyperbole and myopic vision is just way too much.
No game is perfect.
You're using difficult words for a ten year old, impressive.
The number of 0 ratings is astounding. User review rating now down to 7.7
Asking this hear because I don't want to see a spoiler in any of the other threads. Only only want people that actually have the switch version and have started it to reply.
Does the Switch Cart version require a install (outside of the small update)? I have a friend who is adamantly stating that the switch cart version requires a 14.5GB install, even the cart version. I don't believe him but he said he read it in the Gameinformer article. Before I call him out on being wrong, I would like a confirmation of people who have the game.
He's wrong. There is a small update and then you can play. It took me under a minute last night.
I love reading the negative user reviews on metacritic. so much salt from people who never played it.
Just an observation or call it my opinion... the mostly middle aged 30 year old men playing this game living out nostalgia in front of their eyes see these same inconsistencies in other games and take away points in reviews. But because the name "Zelda" is tied to it... I feel like the hyperbole and myopic vision is just way too much.
No game is perfect.
Your friend is seriously misinformed.Asking this hear because I don't want to see a spoiler in any of the other threads. Only only want people that actually have the switch version and have started it to reply.
Does the Switch Cart version require a install (outside of the small update)? I have a friend who is adamantly stating that the switch cart version requires a 14.5GB install, even the cart version. I don't believe him but he said he read it in the Gameinformer article. Before I call him out on being wrong, I would like a confirmation of people who have the game.
Your friend is seriously misinformed.