Fleet_of_Foot
Member
Danoss said:I haven't used either lens that you listed there. I recommend the 17-50/2.8 (non-VC) because I use it and love it, as do many others. There are many reports out there that the model with VC is not as sharp. I believe for that focal range, VC is not necessary unless you have very shaky hands, more money in your pocket too.
It is a good lens. I have the VC version, and I got the VC because I do a lot of video. Can't comment on whether it's less sharp than the non-VC version, but if you plan to do any video, you're going to want the VC.