• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Official Headphone Thread 2.5: We're Making WAVs and Catching FLAC

daxy

Member
I'd been using HD201's for the longest time and replacing them each year, but I got fed up with the cable always breaking or connector bending. Needed a pair for falling asleep to and so not mind too much if something happens to them, so I got a JVC HA-RX700 for €20 off Amazon (Italy), and found that these are just absolutely insane value for that price. Very pleasant all-around and sound better by the day. Super comfortable for extended periods, but god damn huge. Very solid build quality too. Wager to say this is among the best you can get under $50/€50, perhaps even higher up depending on your preferences.
 

HiResDes

Member
I'd been using HD201's for the longest time and replacing them each year, but I got fed up with the cable always breaking or connector bending. Needed a pair for falling asleep to and so not mind too much if something happens to them, so I got a JVC HA-RX700 for €20 off Amazon (Italy), and found that these are just absolutely insane value for that price. Very pleasant all-around and sound better by the day. Super comfortable for extended periods, but god damn huge. Very solid build quality too. Wager to say this is among the best you can get under $50/€50, perhaps even higher up depending on your preferences.

They're pretty good, but man I gotta the HD201s are not good headphones. Not everything Sennheiser makes is gold.
 
I'm not an audiophile, so I'm hoping someone here can help me with some earbud/IEM sound quality issues I'm having with my Sandisk Sansa Clip+ MP3 player.

I just bought the Clip+ two weeks ago, it's my first MP3 player and I mostly bought it because I wanted to listen to podcasts, which I'm new to. The earbuds that were included with it are okay, but I figured, why not upgrade to something with a little more quality so I can enjoy my music as well? After researching the "best budget IEM's under $50" category, I narrowed my choice to the Soundmagic E10's and the Vsonic VSD1S's, both of which were supposed to be big upgrades over stock earbuds.

I decided to order the Soundmagic E10 from Amazon, and when they arrived, I was disappointed to find that they sounded like tin...they had no bass whatsover, no "full" sound to them. I went into the Clip+ equalizer and brought the bass way up and they started to sound acceptable. But after reading a bit online, it seems I shouldn't have to use the equalizer to "fix" the sound in the first place, so I returned the the E10's and ordered the Vsonic VSD1S's.

Got 'em today and...exact same thing...virtually no bass with the equalization off, but acceptable with the bass boosted in the equalizer. I guess I can live with them because I mainly bought the Clip+ for podcasts, but can anyone tell me why this is happening? The Clip+ is supposed to be the best "budget" MP3 player, and both the Soundmagic's and the Vsonic's were rated by multiple websites as among the best of the bargain IEM's, and they were supposed to maybe give you 80% of the performance of much more expensive IEM's.

Why do these both IEM's fail to offer the full sound I'm getting from the stock earbuds, unless I help them with the equalizer?
 

HiResDes

Member
You're probably not getting a good seal. The Clips come with earbuds and you're buying In Ear Monitors, which are a whole different beast, though I believe mostly superior once you get a good seal, but that might require a bit of fiddling (trying different tips, messing with the fit into you feel as though they're snug inside of your ears)
 

daxy

Member
They're pretty good, but man I gotta the HD201s are not good headphones. Not everything Sennheiser makes is gold.

Yeah I'm aware. They're not bad for the price and I used them mostly for falling asleep to podcasts, so they served me well for that!
 
You're probably not getting a good seal. The Clips come with earbuds and you're buying In Ear Monitors, which are a whole different beast, though I believe mostly superior once you get a good seal, but that might require a bit of fiddling (trying different tips, messing with the fit into you feel as though they're snug inside of your ears)

Thanks, that made a world of difference! I switched the tips to the larger ones that were included and made sure they were firmly seated in my ears, and they started sounding like I expected. Also, with the larger tips the equalizer setting I was previously using sounded way too muddy and booming, but now I can leave it on the normal setting and get the sound I like. I'm new to IEM's and had no idea the seal made such a difference. Thanks again.
 

HiResDes

Member
Yeah man worse comes to worse I can see about sending you some different seals to mess with...I have amassed a nice little collection. And I have tiny ears, so if you have bigger ones I'll never use anything above the small size.
 
A bit different from the usual set of posts here but I picked these up for $20 two days ago. They are a set of Sennheiser HD540 headphones from 1985. Next to them is are the SHP9500 which were selling for $64 Canadian a week or so ago and not pictured is the DT990.

Let me just say, the HD540's sound incredible. If it were not for its aesthetics which scream 1980's, I not think these headphones were 30 years old. The guy who owned them kept them in immaculate shape too, the pads still are fine - the foam on the inside of the earcups needs to be replaced though.

Are there any other vintage headphones I should be on the lookout for? I legitimately enjoy these HD540's more than I did my HD598's so I figure this is not an isolated incident.

xZow65y.jpg

Edit: Fixed my broken link
 
The Quads and the TakeT H2 are two phones I always wanted to hear. Still sorta kick myself for not being quicker on the draw with the mint pair of H2 that popped up a few years back.
 

Waikis

Member
This seems to be a really good article on Jitter which includes academic researches on the subject matter.
http://thewelltemperedcomputer.com/KB/BitPerfectJitter.htm

Digital audio is PCM (Pulse Code Modulation) audio most of the time.
It consist of two components, the value of the signal (represented by 16 or 24 bits words) and the time step (sample rate). We have two components, the signal and the time.

Sounds logical but pretty often you hear the 'bits are bits' theory, implying that if the bits are right, everything is right. This theory leaves the other half, the time step, out of the equation.

To play PCM audio, the bits has to be translate to a equivalent voltage and this must be done with a time step matching the sample rate. This is done by a Digital to Analogue Converter, a DAC for short. The sample rate is generated by a clock.

As absolute perfection does not exist, there is always some fluctuation in clock speed.

This is called clock jitter.

Interface jitter is jitter introduced in the transmission of digital signals.Noisy power supplies, improper grounding and electromagnetic interference could induce jitter.

Crucial is the sampling jitter, deviations in the sampling interval in the DA conversion stage. According to the Redbook audio standard the clocks frequency should be within +/-100ppm (parts per million).

JitterAudible.jpg
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
Damn, I actually kinda want a chord mojo?

Especially if the rumored bluetooth module works as I want, which is that I can output and control my music playback on a phone to a dac/amp without needing to tether them together to form a brick. That would actually be exactly what I want out of one of these products.
 
Yeah the Blutooth mode on the Hugo was nice. I did like that a lot to be honest. I know Noble also makes a Blutooth module but I'd never buy anything from them. Anyway, gonna meet up with some folks to listen to the whole Unique Melody line up today. Always wanted to hear the Miracle since it was Joker's fave for a real long time. Friend is getting the entire Empire Ears line up too so that'll be pretty cool, especially since their flagship is supposedly quite a bit better than the EarWerkz Legend.
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
I'm seeing a chart with massive treble roll offs in the mojo head fi thread now though which makes me hesitate on wanting to get it. I know frequency response isn't entirely what a DAC/amp can do but to me all source equipment should be flat.

Yeah I really want to have a look at the empire ears IEMs too. The Spartan IV sounds super interesting. Would be nice to have something neutral in my lineup. SGS writeup made it sound really good.
 
Ahahaha oh Chord...

I hope that LHL sort out their shit. I'm almost certain the V2'll kick the Mojo's ass. Hell it recently kicked the Grace X Massdrop M9XX's ass. I've recommended the V2 to a couple friends who wouldn't even entertain it on principle alone. And I get that. Haven't been burned thankfully but I'd be annoyed as fuck if I preordered a wave and had to sit through their bullshit excuses.

The treble on the V2 is superb. I honestly can't listen to the 450 anymore. I did some A/B against the V2 last night for a friend out of the Leck Mk II and the 450 just sounds etched to me now. Like it's really obvious. You hear it in everything. From vocal delivery, to guitar chords to the snap of the snare to the digital crap in the decay of a crash.

The V2 sounds much smoother and more relaxed. Don't confuse this with syrupy and undetailed cause it's not. It's a very airy, detailed, and smooth sound, and quite unlike anything I've heard in portable audio. The 450 also seems to always be on. It's very forward, hard sounding, and with seemingly no gradation in loud/soft dynamics. It's just one or the other. You don't pick up on the small nuances with the 450. The V2, hours just slip by and you don't notice it cause it's not fatiguing to listen to. Hoping Liquid Carbon ships next week so I can see how that sounds with the V2.

Yeah the Spartan was the one I wanted to hear most. Should be able to hear it myself in 2 weeks if scheduling permits. I talked to SGS the other day and the Perfect Seal AR 6 sounds really interesting. Similar tuning to UERM but seems to have far better imaging. Most IEMs really suck at forward projection. The images typically feel locked in your head and vocalists never really feel like they're actually in front of you like you'd hear on a good 2 channel setup unless you're listening to a modded R2 or a 1plus2. The AR is supposed to address that, and the space between instruments/vocalists/layering is supposed to feel proportionate.

I'll get to hear the AR eventually too. I'm not really in the market for anymore kilobuck IEMs but I guess you never know. That being said, waiting on James to get a crack at the KSE1500, since he doesn't mince words. The HF thread kind of annoys me. Too many people buying into something just cause Jude says so or talking about super hi bit rate files. Last time that happened, we got the Sony Z7 :l. I'm incredibly skeptical that the KSE1500 actually represents some sort of next level leap in IEMs, but, I guess you never know.
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
Hmmm yeah I do want to try out the V2+ too despite LHL's current sketchiness. Still might do if the final chassis seems better than the current one.

Plan right now is to basically get the Aurisonics Harmony, maybe the spartan IV, V2+, compare them altogether to see what would be my favourite setup, then start a massive culling by selling off the ones that don't make the cut.
 

Zavist

Member
I am looking for a replacement cable for my Soundmagic HP100. Can anyone recommend an online store? I cant find anything via google. Thanks!
 

Tommy DJ

Member
I don't trust Jude at all considering he's pretty much the headphone industry's equivalent of a hype man. Nothing wrong with that but its goddamn obvious what his job is and I dunno why people swallow hook, line, sinker, and half of the rod. Araund and Currawong both claim that its a bit short on the extreme ends of both sides of the spectrum while Jude claims otherwise so...
 
What would be the best way to sell my amp/dac? I have an Alo Audio Pan Am stack and want to upgrade to something better. I think it was $600 but I'd be willing to sell it for $250.
 
What would be the best way to sell my amp/dac? I have an Alo Audio Pan Am stack and want to upgrade to something better. I think it was $600 but I'd be willing to sell it for $250.

Probably Head-Fi and Ebay.

Head-Fi is full of knowledgable hobbyists and is hyper competitive so you probably won't get as much as you REALLY want but you'll sell your stuff faster. EBay you'll have to wait a bit but you can get more money, however EBay and Paypal combine to take more money from your fees.
 

Servbot24

Banned
I'm considering grabbing a pair of RHA MA750i for $130 (standard price). Before I do, any alternates in that price range I should consider (I can go up to 200 or so)?

I listen to a fairly broad range of music, with an emphasis on pop and minimal techno. Microphonics are also very important, cable bumps drive me insane.
 
Probably Head-Fi and Ebay.

Head-Fi is full of knowledgable hobbyists and is hyper competitive so you probably won't get as much as you REALLY want but you'll sell your stuff faster. EBay you'll have to wait a bit but you can get more money, however EBay and Paypal combine to take more money from your fees.

Yeh I'd sell on Heafi but isn't it full of scammers?

Theres really not seller protection either way right?
 
Would the Chord Mojo be a good recommendation for someone looking to power some HD650s?

I want to sell my Pan Am and get the the Shure electrostats for portable use and the Mojo for the HD650s.

I'm reading that the Mojo is near Hugo SQ at a third of the price.

If not, what would someone recommend as a dac/amp combo replacement?
 
Yeh I'd sell on Heafi but isn't it full of scammers?

Theres really not seller protection either way right?

Honestly, I'm much more wary of eBay than I am of Head-Fi. The audiophile community can be a bit too delusional for my tastes but they've been nothing but nice and welcoming to a newbie like myself. The video game community could honestly learn a lot from them.

EBay will usually take the side of the buyer, even if the seller provides a mountain of evidence to the contrary. You gotta be super careful selling on eBay because of this. That and Ebay plus Paypal fees will eat into your profits. That's not going to be a concern if you sell on Head-Fi though because you will not get a good price as a seller on Head-Fi.
 

Rootbeer

Banned
I've seen a lot of earbud recommendations lately, but I was wondering what people would suggest for a pair of earbuds suitable for falling asleep in somewhat regularly? I need it for traveling or when I am falling asleep listening to podcasts (some light music/youtube usage too)

qualifications:
- better overall sound than the current gen apple earbuds
- has to be suitable for sleeping in (ear on top of pillow, etc.)
- prefer something not too pricey, under $100 would be nice.

I've looked at a few of the earbuds recommended in recent pages and some look like they would fall out if I rolled around too much. Honestly, I don't have a lot of trouble keeping the Apple ones in. I can toss and turn a fair bit sometimes, and I often wake up with them both still in. I just want something that sounds better, because I can tell a huge difference between those earbuds and my PC headphones when listening to the same podcasts. I'd like to narrow the gap some.
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
I'd still recommend the trinity hyperions honestly. I do lay in my bed listening to them, though I don't actually fall asleep with them. I do lay my head on the side with them and don't really feel anything.

Another iem people use for low profile sleep use is the shure se215.

If you want actual earbuds and not iems though, I guess the VE monks?
 

Rootbeer

Banned
Thanks. Doesn't have to be earbuds, but based on the few in-ear i've used I feel earbuds are more comfortable for me, but it's been a while and I haven't tried some of the newer in-ear offerings. It may be time to revisit, especially since a lot of them are coming with fittings for multiple sizes now.
 
Any Fidelio X2 owners here? These seem pretty perfect for me for my home studio. Relatively neutral but with a bit of a bass boost (i make techno/house). Comfortable and non-fatigueing.

Other options being weighted are the NADs, Sennheiser 6xx series (especially once they do BF refurb sales), and HiFi Man HE-400.
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
Are they, I haven't heard them yet, but my impressions from reading about them is that they're too bassy to be neutral.

The NAD viso hp50 is more to the warmer side of neutral, and I actually do think that they sound absolutely wonderful at that price range. Too bad they make you look like you're wearing luggage handles, but if you're in a studio environment it shouldn't matter.
 
Are they, I haven't heard them yet, but my impressions from reading about them is that they're too bassy to be neutral.

The NAD viso hp50 is more to the warmer side of neutral, and I actually do think that they sound absolutely wonderful at that price range. Too bad they make you look like you're wearing luggage handles, but if you're in a studio environment it shouldn't matter.

Yeah I guess I mean to imply I've heard outside of the bass they are neutral and smooth. Having some extra bass is a positive for me as I want to mix for systems that have large woofers. My monitors are very flat response wise but roll off on bass hard. Given space limitations, a sub isn't an option in that room (my main room system is very high quality with a sealed sub so mixes get piped in there when I'm not composing).
 

Servbot24

Banned
I'm considering grabbing a pair of RHA MA750i for $130 (standard price). Before I do, any alternates in that price range I should consider (I can go up to 200 or so)?

I listen to a fairly broad range of music, with an emphasis on pop and minimal techno. Microphonics are also very important, cable bumps drive me insane.

I went ahead and pulled the trigger on these. Got several trips coming up so will be nice to have good portable sound :)
 
I fall asleep listening to podcasts too :). Funnily enough we pretty much discussed this matter only a few days ago. Have a look at post # 1799 onwards as that might be helpful.

I've seen a lot of earbud recommendations lately, but I was wondering what people would suggest for a pair of earbuds suitable for falling asleep in somewhat regularly? I need it for traveling or when I am falling asleep listening to podcasts (some light music/youtube usage too)

qualifications:
- better overall sound than the current gen apple earbuds
- has to be suitable for sleeping in (ear on top of pillow, etc.)
- prefer something not too pricey, under $100 would be nice.

I've looked at a few of the earbuds recommended in recent pages and some look like they would fall out if I rolled around too much. Honestly, I don't have a lot of trouble keeping the Apple ones in. I can toss and turn a fair bit sometimes, and I often wake up with them both still in. I just want something that sounds better, because I can tell a huge difference between those earbuds and my PC headphones when listening to the same podcasts. I'd like to narrow the gap some.
 

HiResDes

Member
I went ahead and pulled the trigger on these. Got several trips coming up so will be nice to have good portable sound :)

Not a bad choice at all, just slightly dark, but it makes them less fatiguing than a lot of other options.

I think other decent choices would include: Final Audio Heaven IV, Audio-Technica ATH-CKR9, Dunu DN-1000, maybe the Dunu Titan 1.
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
The Titan 3 sounds more interesting that the titan 1 actually. More mid focus, smoother treble, removable cables, and better isolation.
 

Servbot24

Banned
Not a bad choice at all, just slightly dark, but it makes them less fatiguing than a lot of other options.

I think other decent choices would include: Final Audio Heaven IV, Audio-Technica ATH-CKR9, Dunu DN-1000, maybe the Dunu Titan 1.

In general I'm fine with a dark sound. I'll be coming off of the Sennheiser Momentum IEMs.
 

Tommy DJ

Member
I'll give you a suggestion: you're not really solving anything unless the cable is somehow attenuating the bass, fixing the bass distortion, getting rid of some of that closed headphone hollowness, and eliminating that severe 4khz dip. The Sony Z7's faults (like the MDR-1R/1A) are a result of shitty engineering/cost cutting...Sony is yet another company who thinks its sensible to put drivers in a hollow plastic cup. Its basically a really expensive mid-fi headphone unless you find a way to deal with its hollow driver housing. Fortunately, this is easily solved by shoving Dynamat and acoustic fiber inside the hollow cups.

Amusingly, Dynamat and acoustic fiber does a pretty good job solving all of these problems so who knows why Sony couldn't be bothered putting an extra 50 cents into their $$$ flagship.
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
Well bad news. My asg 2.5 seems to have been lost during shipment when I sent it for repairs.

Good news, addicted to audio have offered a full refund in store credit, so that's awesome.

Still thinking of getting the aurisonics harmony with it, though my issues with the 2.5 got me a bit leery. Seems like I might have just ran into a bad batch though and there doesn't seem to a lot of problems with that company in general, so I might just put it down to bad luck and give the harmony a shot. At least I know that addicted to audio will take care of me. Plus I still love the sound of the aurisonics.
 

DagsJT

Member
I've currently got an Astro Mixamp plugged into my Xbox One via optical and USB to my PC, playing through a pair of AKG K612's. Is the Mixamp giving me a good representation of my K612's and what they should sound like?

I've seen someone else mention that they use a Sound Blaster E5 but not sure how much difference it would make considering it would cost me over £100 to replace the Mixamp.

Any advice?
 
LEND ME UR EARS IS HAVING A BIG SALE GOING ALL ALL MONTH


...Really wanna hear those Future Sonics G10, I bet the bass on those is ridiculous. Oh and I'd also love to play around with all of those configurations on the FLC.

If all you care about is mounds of bass then sure. Friend of mine had the G10. He's a former basshead. Said the Tenore just trashed it and flipped it back on the FS posthaste.

There's a tour going on for the FLC actually. I think nmatheis is running it. You might be able to still get on.
 
Top Bottom