If it's good it doesn't matter as it's a win-win. I simply don't see the problem with your two ideas, and that's exactly how I feel with this show.Imagine if The Sopranos was "The Penguins" instead, or The Wire was "Gotham Beat". Any value added there? Or just handicaps?
This is easily the best show on TV right now. Milioti's performance in episode 4 is fucking sublime. Sofia's character is every bit as good as Oz.
I thought it would be a good series, but I didn't think it would be this good, or genuinely add texture and context to The Batman that improves the movie as well, retroactively.
I’m glad, it should more often than not, be that way for acting. Perform at your best potential for better roles and become a name to remember. Shouldn’t matter how great or shitty the role is, they made it to a point where hundreds of others failed, so they have to prove that they were worth the choice.The show is good but I feel like Cristin Milioti is elevating it even further because she's giving the performance of a lifetime.
The show is good but I feel like Cristin Milioti is elevating it even further because she's giving the performance of a lifetime.
Also, should be noted that the show is run by, and episode 4 was directed by, women. This is how you actually do strong female characters. Would be nice for the rest of modern Hollywood to watch and fucking learn.
There's no way an AI will get better at writing human characters than actual humans. AI can crap out the plot of a generic action movie or drama but they're not going to write realistic dialogue. Heck, half the humans out there can't even write realistic dialogue. I'm not that worried about AI's influence. At best, they'll just produce very average or mediocre content and I already ignore that stuff as it is.or it will be too late by the time they do because the AI will be already ready to go.
No one said anything about ‘better’, it just has to be good enough.There's no way an AI will get better at writing human characters than actual humans. AI can crap out the plot of a generic action movie or drama but they're not going to write realistic dialogue. Heck, half the humans out there can't even write realistic dialogue. I'm not that worried about AI's influence. At best, they'll just produce very average or mediocre content.
This feels subjective. Many of the complaints about these characters before people even see them. In those cases they just hate the idea of the empowered women. And the idea of "badly-written" certainly seems a bit like a moving goalpost in the idea that only certain character types are acceptable and strong empowered women aren't allowed. Is Cristin's performance great because the character is very flawed and troubled? Is that the only woman that's acceptable in cinema? Seems a bit restrictive, yes?And they say we "incels" hate female characters. No. We hate badly written modern female characters.
This feels subjective. Many of the complaints about these characters before people even see them. In those cases they just hate the idea of the empowered women. And the idea of "badly-written" certainly seems a bit like a moving goalpost in the idea that only certain character types are acceptable and strong empowered women aren't allowed. Is Cristin's performance great because the character is very flawed and troubled? Is that the only woman that's acceptable in cinema? Seems a bit restrictive, yes?
This feels subjective. Many of the complaints about these characters before people even see them. In those cases they just hate the idea of the empowered women. And the idea of "badly-written" certainly seems a bit like a moving goalpost in the idea that only certain character types are acceptable and strong empowered women aren't allowed. Is Cristin's performance great because the character is very flawed and troubled? Is that the only woman that's acceptable in cinema? Seems a bit restrictive, yes?
If we want to question a female character on the show, I'd go with the mother. Not because she's a bad character but it's a bit of a trope with the tough-guy character having a parent with dementia. I hope that relationship gets deeper than what it is but some background stories on them could help.
For me, felt Episode 1 was pretty good and Part 2 was excellent and real fun. I'll try to catch up over the weekend.
I just watched all 4 Penguin episodes and think Sofia is awesome.I'll agree that people often jump the gun whenever they see an "empowered female character". But, that's only because we've been conditioned to expect this. That said, people should try to never judge a book by it's cover.
I will say the problem often with the "empowered female character" by modern Hollywood is that it jumps all the hoops to get to the end goal, creating an empty shell missing all the components of a well developed character. They think just having a "strong woman" is enough.
If you're looking at this in black and white, good or bad, then of course you're going to think we only want to see female characters written one way. But, that couldn't be further from the truth. A female character doesn't always have to be flawed, but is one of the most fundamental ways you can make a character likeable and relatable. No human being is perfect so why does their idea of a "strong female character" often is? It's an idealized fantasy for the sole reason that is "woman's turn now to take the lead". It comes off as childish, ignorant, and immature and 90% of the time the character reflects it.
It's funny, modern Hollywood is actually the one who thinks of female characters one way when you think about it.
So apparently the reason John Torturro didn't return as Carmine Falcone wasn't because of "scheduling conflicts" as previous reported, but because the show is too violent against women?
Meanwhile, he strangles a woman to death in The Batman and tries to kill his own daughter. Also the showrunner is a woman, and the writing and directing credits have women as well.
He could have just left it at "I did what I wanted to with the role" and no one would have made a fuss. But when you make weird statements like this... people are going to raise their eyebrows.
But whatever, Mark Strong effortlessly slipped into the role so it's not a big loss IMO
So apparently the reason John Torturro didn't return as Carmine Falcone wasn't because of "scheduling conflicts" as previous reported, but because the show is too violent against women?
Meanwhile, he strangles a woman to death in The Batman and tries to kill his own daughter. Also the showrunner is a woman, and the writing and directing credits have women as well.
He could have just left it at "I did what I wanted to with the role" and no one would have made a fuss. But when you make weird statements like this... people are going to raise their eyebrows.
But whatever, Mark Strong effortlessly slipped into the role so it's not a big loss IMO
Just finished episode 7. Show continues to be really good, but I'm really perplexed about the creative choice regarding
Sal's death. I genuinely don't understand how having him randomly die of a heart attack makes any sense at all from a storytelling standpoint. Unless I missed something, there was no foreshadowing for it....he never showed any sign of heart trouble previously. I get that he had to go at some point to set up the final showdown between Oz and Sofia, but he was one of the most important characters on the show....seemed deserving of a demise that had more of a buildup.
I think it’s more about Penguin taking credit for things he didn’t do. The episode also revealed him not taking credit for something he did in fact do. He’s a slimy fuck lolJust finished episode 7. Show continues to be really good, but I'm really perplexed about the creative choice regarding
Sal's death. I genuinely don't understand how having him randomly die of a heart attack makes any sense at all from a storytelling standpoint. Unless I missed something, there was no foreshadowing for it....he never showed any sign of heart trouble previously. I get that he had to go at some point to set up the final showdown between Oz and Sofia, but he was one of the most important characters on the show....seemed deserving of a demise that had more of a buildup.
That’s how I took it. Even though there might have been subtle hints in past episodes, the big moment in question was more about Penguin than Sal.I think it’s more about Penguin taking credit for things he didn’t do. The episode also revealed him not taking credit for something he did in fact do. He’s a slimy fuck lol
Honestly Sal was a minor character appearing on screen probably 15 total minutes. He’s also an old man and I think in one of the last couple of episodes there’s an exchange with Sofia about his health? I remember something when he was cooking or something. Either way he’s old as fuck lol
Just finished episode 7. Show continues to be really good, but I'm really perplexed about the creative choice regarding
Sal's death. I genuinely don't understand how having him randomly die of a heart attack makes any sense at all from a storytelling standpoint. Unless I missed something, there was no foreshadowing for it....he never showed any sign of heart trouble previously. I get that he had to go at some point to set up the final showdown between Oz and Sofia, but he was one of the most important characters on the show....seemed deserving of a demise that had more of a buildup.
Another great episode but the finale of this episode unfortunately crossed that "where is Batman?" line. The Falcones being wiped out via a carbon monoxide "accident"? Sure, it's understandable why Bats wouldn't follow up on that... but the corner of a city block just imploded in a war between gangsters, and some innocents were seemingly caught up in the blast. Trust me, I don't want Bats to show up in this show, but I'm having a hard time believing he could ignore something as significant as that, especially after what happened at the end of The Batman.
It will end up that he was out of Gotham at the time. Didn’t he ride off with Selina at the end of Batman?Unfortunately the showrunner has made her stance pretty clear that she doesn't want the show to be seen as a comic spinoff (which I think being kind of silly considering that it's literally called "The Penguin"), so I doubt we'll be seeing Bats, but I do agree that the conflict has reached a point where his absence seems very strange.
No, they both went their separate ways. Catwoman says she'll be going to Bludhaven while Bats stays behind to protect Gotham.It will end up that he was out of Gotham at the time. Didn’t he ride off with Selina at the end of Batman?
It will end up that he was out of Gotham at the time. Didn’t he ride off with Selina at the end of Batman?
I strongly suspect that THE BATMAN II will explain his absence. Maybe the events of THE PENGUIN and the sequel will also overlap.No, they both went their separate ways. Catwoman says she'll be going to Bludhaven while Bats stays behind to protect Gotham.
Another great episode but the finale of this episode unfortunately crossed that "where is Batman?" line. The Falcones being wiped out via a carbon monoxide "accident"? Sure, it's understandable why Bats wouldn't follow up on that... but the corner of a city block just imploded in a war between gangsters, and some innocents were seemingly caught up in the blast. Trust me, I don't want Bats to show up in this show, but I'm having a hard time believing he could ignore something as significant as that, especially after what happened at the end of The Batman.
re overlapping -- I don't know about that, wouldn't the timeline of the show only be a few weeks or a month after the Riddler attack? Seems like they'd want a little more distance for a sequel than that, to let Batman recover, let him train some more, etc.I strongly suspect that THE BATMAN II will explain his absence. Maybe the events of THE PENGUIN and the sequel will also overlap.
The second movie might also have to tackle the very difficult subject of humanized and empathetic criminals.I strongly suspect that THE BATMAN II will explain his absence. Maybe the events of THE PENGUIN and the sequel will also overlap.
The Batman is heavily inspired by New 52's Zero Year, and the rumors are that the second movie will be about The Court of Owls, so I suppose it's possible that they've already captured him after the events of the first movie. But it seems a bit too soon for that - as another poster mentioned, it would probably be smarter to have more distance between the two movies.I strongly suspect that THE BATMAN II will explain his absence. Maybe the events of THE PENGUIN and the sequel will also overlap.