The people have spoken: Remakes/Remasters > Backwards Compatibility

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think a Remaster or Remake has flopped yet.

STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection

I mean I couldn't just stand on this hill & be silent .
giphy.webp
 
BC is great and all but PS360 gen games are so goddamn awful looking and performing these days that a Remaster is preferable.

Games like God of War 1-2 really deserve a remake though, even if it was just to the fidelity of GoW3 that would be awesome.
Devil May Cry 1 would benefit from a remake too, expand the gameplay with styles and such, I want that since it had the best setting/music in that series.
So yeah theres definitely a place for both.
 
backward compatibly is way better, you dont have to rebuy a game and also remasters/remakes are worst most of the time. with bc you play the original the way it was meant to be and it still looks improved with better hardware.
 
I think there is a case for both. BC should be a given because we already paid for these games. Remasters should be for great games that deserve one, and there should be enough 'remastering' done to warrant the full price they will no doubt sell it for. Don't just improve the visual…. Go back and modernise and improve the controls.maybe some subtle gameplay enhancements and even better animation in some cases. Some game deserve all that…… but many are just fine as BC with improved frame rates and resolution.


I also dont think games that are less than ten years old should be getting remasters. That's a game that should just be improved via BC.
 
backward compatibly is way better, you dont have to rebuy a game and also remasters/remakes are worst most of the time. with bc you play the original the way it was meant to be and it still looks improved with better hardware.
BC is horrible. You are locked to shitty 30fps most cases for 360 era games. I'd gladly pay for a remastered version at 60.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom