The Player 1 Podcast Topic

BRW9iaUCIAIiFfJ.jpg

Sorry your avant garde art got censored Phil.
 
Mike you said you were disappointed by Madden but then didnt actually talk about playing Madden. What are you disappointed with?
 
Disappearing players and the general glitchiness of the game - still lots of stuttering, unresponsive menus and UI, etc. All things that should have been cleaned up in the ninth version of the game on these systems.

Man coverage seems useless (maybe it's just these teams in the demo)

Still loads of ways to exploit the defensive AI (maybe this can just never change)

The new L-trigger/R-trigger running thing is kind of ineffective--you can do just as much with no trigger, aside from speed burst

Infinity Engine is still around 75% goofy. Better than last year, when it was 90% goofy--still a mess though

Presentation is still pretty atrocious
 
You thought man coverage was useless last year?? Man two high was essentially unstoppable for the first three seasons of the MaddenGAF league. The only problem was playing off made the curl unstoppable unless you dropped a LB/DE (or BJ Raji against MrBob!) into a hook zone which made running pretty easy.

Outside of Ballhawk and a few broken offensive plays I thought defense was pretty excellent last year. Obviously it depends on the team. Man up with Williams and Woodson pressing was crazy effective the first two years of the franchise. Years 3-6 not so much since Woodson was old and busted.

Ballhawk though made that all moot. Fuck that shit.
 
Yeah my bad, thought I saw a "still" in there. Honestly I hope man coverage is toned down. Constantly running slants, wheels and TE streaks got boring as hell last year.

My biggest takeaway from the demo was how broken the option game is going to be. Ugh.
 
Can't say I agree with the point of view that reviewers should weigh the price point in the review much. It's not for nothing almost all reviewers have moved away from that model of reviews.
 
No gameplay impressions from Phil for the W101 :(
I played an early version of it when I worked at Nintendo Power, but it never really clicked for me. I should download the demo and give it another shot.

Sorry your avant garde art got censored Phil.
It's beautiful, right? Nintendo just doesn't understand art.

You need to kick the cards and start playing Dota, Phil.
I'll have to try it sometime, but it doesn't really seem like something that I would get into. I have been wrong about that sort of thing before, though. I do own a copy, though. I have no idea how I got it (Humble Bundle?).
 
You can play with MaddenGAF. We just talk sports, play Dota and sing goo goo dolls to each other all game. You'll fit right in.
 
Can't say I agree with the point of view that reviewers should weigh the price point in the review much. It's not for nothing almost all reviewers have moved away from that model of reviews.

To be fair, most of them don't really have a grasp of it. ;)
 
Can't say I agree with the point of view that reviewers should weigh the price point in the review much. It's not for nothing almost all reviewers have moved away from that model of reviews.

There are two conditions where I feel price should be taken into account and mentioned - but briefly and maybe not even taken into account into a score. When the game offers a lot of content for a cheap or budget price, or when the game offers very little content for an initially high price. As a buyer of a product, I'd want to know that and weigh it against my own expectations.
 
There are two conditions where I feel price should be taken into account and mentioned - but briefly and maybe not even taken into account into a score. When the game offers a lot of content for a cheap or budget price, or when the game offers very little content for an initially high price. As a buyer of a product, I'd want to know that and weigh it against my own expectations.
This is pretty much my exact view on this. Mention in the text if the game is an exceptionally good or bad deal based on price, but don't let it influence the score.
 
I just checked and I have 18 gaming podcasts in my feed, not to mention all the podcasts I used to listen to but stopped. I have no clue where that clip if from

Jesus Mike, just how many do you listen too?
 
This is pretty much my exact view on this. Mention in the text if the game is an exceptionally good or bad deal based on price, but don't let it influence the score.

I'm going to third this. Just because reviewers don't want what they're writing to be product reviews, it doesn't change the fact that they're basically writing product reviews. There's a way to do it where you weigh the artistic worth and game mechanics more prominently than the value for dollar, but ignoring the latter really does your audience no favours.

Of course, the idea of writing to their audience seems like a foreign concept for a lot of reviewers nowadays.
 
Yeah, I love it every time I play it--the hand-to-hand combat is so damn much fun. I just always forget to play it.
 
"How big of a dinner party are you having?" is one of the funniest things I've ever heard on this podcast.
 
I'll have to try it sometime, but it doesn't really seem like something that I would get into. I have been wrong about that sort of thing before, though. I do own a copy, though. I have no idea how I got it (Humble Bundle?).

This is what I said half a year ago when asked to give it a try. 1 brilliant belgium ale + Purge tutorial + game of dota later and I was hooked.
I am now closing in on 700 hours played.
With dota its all in the details. Noone fully grasps how satisfying something as simple as a last hit can be, before they try it.
 
What exactly was all the guffawing about at the 56 minute mark? I listened to that part like 3 times and I still don't get it, I suspect it was something vaguely sexual in nature since it was about oysters.
 
What exactly was all the guffawing about at the 56 minute mark? I listened to that part like 3 times and I still don't get it, I suspect it was something vaguely sexual in nature since it was about oysters.
I believe you have to wait until the zinger to get the whole joke.

If you watched the YouTube feed, though, it would all make sense.
 
*has definitely played series in canon order* And yet somehow this is not the shameful aspect of my video game playing. *spars with Ghaleon puppet*

Excellent episode, all; a great balance of criticism, pontification, and jokes. And burying Dyack.
 
I must know--which series?

I mean, it's series, plural, but let's stick with the most embarrassing Konami examples.

Gradius was 1. I was intrigued by Konami's awesome PSP shoot-'em-up collections. Should anyone know that it had a timeline, since it affects literally nothing about any game in it? Does anyone care that it incorporates multiple games with titles that aren't Gradius? Would anyone like to know that I hold strong opinions about whether Xexex is a part of the series? Of course not, because none of that matters.

What does matter is that the 1st 2 thoughts that went through my head when Rebirth came out were, "Oh, frick, I am going to be so mad if it's canon and isn't at the front or back of the timeline," and, after research, "I hate you so much, Konami."

On the more positive side, I hadn't played through every canon Castlevania when Order Of Ecclesia came out, so I played through the series in order (with infinite lives for the ones I had played already). I think games like that, which tie a defined and developed aesthetic to the era in which each takes place, are pretty rewarding to play in order.
 
Top Bottom