• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Sad Tale of Michael Jackson: Why I Think He was Innocent

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mercury Fred said:
Just take a look at the interview from a few years ago where he talks about sharing his bed with a child. He had a completely different perspective about bringing a child, especially one who's not your own, into one's own bed. It's more damning than anything in the court cases imo.

Anyway, I'm bailing out. I loved his music and his spirit, but I think he had a very tragic life. I don't want to get caught up in pissing match about MJ's actions. But please don't let your love for a person's work blind you to their faults.
On top of that, the GAF aggregate has some of the most extreme views on pedophilia I have ever witnessed. So yes, there must be some cognitive dissonance going on with some people.

BamYouHaveAids said:
it's pretty simple

defense: "the defense would like to submit thriller into evidence"

jury: "verdict: not guilty"

CASE CLOSED
Things like this for example. It might be a joke, and I don't know how BamYouHaveAids has ever reacted to the numerous paedophilia's threads on GAF, but still, it boils down to people making jokes and minimizing paedophilia (or/and acting on it) because he made cool songs. And that's just...not right.
 

Calcaneus

Member
BamYouHaveAids said:
it's pretty simple

defense: "the defense would like to submit thriller into evidence"

jury: "verdict: not guilty"

CASE CLOSED
This has to be my favorite Jacko meme. Never gets old.
 

Lain

Member
Good read, and I totally agree with the OP (and fuck, it is a sad tale indeed).
I don't think he was guilty at all. He acted in ways normal adults don't act, but I really don't think he ever touched kids.
 

Az987

all good things
bud said:
i think it's a conspiracy

he was about to give 50 concerts
he died at the age of 50
btw, (50+50)/2 = yes... 50

50

think about that

Holy shit, its 2pac all over again
 
ultim8p00 said:
That's not the point. I didn't make this thread to win. I totally expected this reaction from GAF.

you're probably better off stating your point to your dog.

seriously folks if you simply read the depositions its not so far fetched that he was pretty much innocent.
 

ultim8p00

Banned
StormyTheRabbit said:
People who care this much about a celebrity disgust me.

Great guy, I'm sure, just could never care this much about a singer.

It's not because he is a celebrity. If this were any other guy that got the same treatment I'd be just as pissed. It's because of the way he was treated. I'm not in anyways saying that the way MJ behave around kids was right; he was fucking weird. True. And yes, it's totally cool for people to be concerned. But what gets to me is that people took take advantage of his weird behavior around kids mercilessly and destroyed his life in the process. I mean here you have people flat out making shit up about just to get money.

The fact that he was with 30 kids, and none of them said they were molested, plus the fact that so many people made shit up just to get money from him , plus the fact that he is a humanitarian, plus the fact that most people that have been around him claim he is a genuinely nice guy, plus the fact that there was no evidence found, plus the fact that he was found not guilty is enough for me I guess. Yeah, that's not much but it should do.


It's kind of like taking advantage of a kid with a disability, which is why it gets to me so much.
 
Lain said:
Good read, and I totally agree with the OP (and fuck, it is a sad tale indeed).
I don't think he was guilty at all. He acted in ways normal adults don't act, but I really don't think he ever touched kids.

Second. I also agree with the OP. I think michael was totally, completely innocent there.

Of course, I also think OJ didn't do it, so take what I say with a grain of salt
 

PSGames

Junior Member
joelseph said:
He settled one of his cases.

With insurance money. MJ didn't pay a damn dime. I wish people would learn the facts.

Calcaneus said:
This has to be my favorite Jacko meme. Never gets old.


Michael Jackson hated when the media used this term. So disrespectful.
 

ultim8p00

Banned
PSGames said:
With insurance money. MJ didn't pay a damn dime. I wish people would learn the facts.

Seriously. One of the reasons I made this thread. Learn the fucking facts. The damage is just irreparable now I guess. I wonder what could have happened if the media tried to stay objective. Maybe we would have found out the truth.

Manmademan said:
Second. I also agree with the OP. I think michael was totally, completely innocent there.

Of course, I also think OJ didn't do it, so take what I say with a grain of salt

I don't think Michael did it, but I sure as hell think OJ did it. Stop talking like the two are mutually exclusive. There is overwhelming evidence than MJ's case was just greedy people capitalizing on a weird guy that happens to be rich.
 

ZeoVGM

Banned
This seems like a nice in depth read. No time to read it at work, but bookmarking for home.

Though I did just see this:

With insurance money. MJ didn't pay a damn dime. I wish people would learn the facts.

I absolutely never knew that.
 

YakiSOBA

Member
MJ is innocent, fuck all the parents who tried to sue him for money! I hope their kids (or grandkids by now) DO get molested, that'll teach them!!! GRRRR

RIP MJ!!!
 

pringles

Member
Very nicely put together. Fuck the haters, this deserves it's own thread. More people need to know that MJ was most likely completely innocent and the victim of money-hungry bastards who saw an easy target.
 
ultim8p00 said:
Seriously. One of the reasons I made this thread. Learn the fucking facts. The damage is just irreparable now I guess. I wonder what could have happened if the media tried to stay objective. Maybe we would have found out the truth.



I don't think Michael did it, but I sure as hell think OJ did it. Stop talking like the two are mutually exclusive. There is overwhelming evidence than MJ's case was just greedy people capitalizing on a weird guy that happens to be rich.

There's also overwhelming evidence nicole was a ho who ran with the wrong crowd and had it coming, and OJ was an innocent bystander.

OJ was totally innocent. and the sports memorabilia thing was a total set up and a mockery of justice.
 

Ryck

Member
Manmademan said:
OJ was totally innocent. and the sports memorabilia thing was a total set up and a mockery of justice.
theo_quintesson.jpg
 

Catalix

And on the sixth day the LORD David Bowie created man and woman in His image. And he saw that it was good. On the seventh day the LORD created videogames so that He might take the bloody day off for once.
Not sure if he did it or not, but the facts laid out in the OP were definitely insightful.

I wasn't aware of some of those details, so this thread has proved its worth for me.
 

Ryck

Member
Choke on the Magic said:
So you'd let your kids sleep with him?
I wouldn't.. and also if someone molested my kid all the money in the world wouldn't stop me from making that fucker burn, hang or rot in prison.
 

ultim8p00

Banned
Choke on the Magic said:
So you'd let your kids sleep with him?

What a fucking stupid question.

You obviously didn't read the OP, or any of my posts, or you can't read, or you are stupid.

I have clearly said that MJ had a weird way of interacting with children, so of course I will not let my kids sleep with him. I wouldn't let my kids sleep with any grown man for that matter.

But I would certainly pay him a vist with my kids and let them play with him in the amusement park and stuff, just like I would with any other adult. I don't think it is normal for a grown man to want to have slumber parties with kids and sleep with them, but like I said, he wanted to relieve his lost childhood, which explains why he did those things. He did not have sex with kids.

People saw that he like being around kids and used that opportunity to make shit up. Like they say, the most convincing lies have an element of truth to them.

Musashi Wins! said:
You're officially a creepy bastard now too. Congrats.

what..what does this even mean? are you being funny?
 

SturokBGD

Member
ultim8p00 said:
I don't think it is normal for a grown man to want to have slumber parties with kids and sleep with them, but like I said, he wanted to relieve his lost childhood, which explains why he did those things.
True story - I often pine for the wild sex life I never had as a teenager. This sometimes annoys my wife.
 

Holepunch

Member
I'm just waiting for the counter-argument for all this. You know, one that might actually cite sources when quoting people.

...I still love MJ though. Nice to know there is an argument for his innocence, but having yet to see the evidence for both sides, I can't conclude anything.
 

Masked Man

I said wow
Awesome post(s). I was never really sure about the whole situation: I wanted to believe in his innocence--I would hate to think that anyone would be capable of doing such a horrible thing as molesting a child, and his upbringing was traumatic enough that being labeled a pedophile would merely add to his troubles--but there were still lingering doubts. I commend you, ultim8p00, for helping me resolve the debate in my mind. Jackson was, is, and will forever be innocent.

R.I.P. MJ
 

JimmyV

Banned
So it took two full posts to say people saw the money and took whatever chance they could to grab it? This has be known/thought of.

ultim8p00 said:

Where is MJ today? Dead. The world is full of shit, and fuck any of you ignorant assholes that call him a pedophile.

This really didnt have much to do with the rest of your post. Him being dead really doesnt have much to do with the pedophile accusers.
 

seat

Member
Holepunch said:
I'm just waiting for the counter-argument for all this. You know, one that might actually cite sources when quoting people.
Still waiting for this too.

Blind fandom does weird things to people, like the creation of this topic, or writing stuff like this:

ultim8p00 said:
The world is full of shit, and fuck any of you ignorant assholes that call him a pedophile.

Way to show how close-minded you truly are.
 

mrkgoo

Member
ultim8p00 said:
It's not because he is a celebrity. If this were any other guy that got the same treatment I'd be just as pissed. It's because of the way he was treated. I'm not in anyways saying that the way MJ behave around kids was right; he was fucking weird. True. And yes, it's totally cool for people to be concerned. But what gets to me is that people took take advantage of his weird behavior around kids mercilessly and destroyed his life in the process. I mean here you have people flat out making shit up about just to get money.

The fact that he was with 30 kids, and none of them said they were molested, plus the fact that so many people made shit up just to get money from him , plus the fact that he is a humanitarian, plus the fact that most people that have been around him claim he is a genuinely nice guy, plus the fact that there was no evidence found, plus the fact that he was found not guilty is enough for me I guess. Yeah, that's not much but it should do.


It's kind of like taking advantage of a kid with a disability, which is why it gets to me so much.

You know, it's noble you have this agenda, and I have nothing for and/or against Jacko either way, but these so-called facts don't really mean all that much. It alludes to his personality, but not his innocence.

For example, just because people made up stuff doesn't make someone innocent. Of course, nor does it make them guilty. Just saying.

Furthermore, I like to separate pedophilia from the actual crime of diddling children or supporting the diddling/exploitation of children. If it's in one's head, where's the harm? Seek help, maybe, just to prevent any actual diddling.

(I'd better stop with the defense - I'll probably attract attention).
 

mernst23

Member
mrkgoo said:
You know, it's noble you have this agenda, and I have nothing for and/or against Jacko either way, but these so-called facts don't really mean all that much. It alludes to his personality, but not his innocence.

For example, just because people made up stuff doesn't make someone innocent. Of course, nor does it make them guilty. Just saying.

Furthermore, I like to separate pedophilia from the actual crime of diddling children or supporting the diddling/exploitation of children. If it's in one's head, where's the harm? Seek help, maybe, just to prevent any actual diddling.

(I'd better stop with the defense - I'll probably attract attention).

Why don't you take a seat?
 

Tarazet

Member
mernst23 said:
I'm interested to where I can find pedo insurance.

fistful? Any details?

Shit, I'd like to know too. I'm a piano teacher and it's just too easy to lose my livelihood to some kid who hates the piano and is trying to be funny.
 

ultim8p00

Banned
JimmyV said:
So it took two full posts to say people saw the money and took whatever chance they could to grab it? This has be known/thought of.

So that's all you got from this? I'm surprised.

JimmyV said:
This really didnt have much to do with the rest of your post. Him being dead really doesnt have much to do with the pedophile accusers.

It doesn't. It's an aside, which is why it is separate from the rest of the posts. Those statements are clearly independent of each other so I don't see how you could possibly make that connection.

Love the slightly haughty attitude btw.

mrkgoo said:
You know, it's noble you have this agenda, and I have nothing for and/or against Jacko either way, but these so-called facts don't really mean all that much. It alludes to his personality, but not his innocence.

For example, just because people made up stuff doesn't make someone innocent. Of course, nor does it make them guilty. Just saying.

Furthermore, I like to separate pedophilia from the actual crime of diddling children or supporting the diddling/exploitation of children. If it's in one's head, where's the harm? Seek help, maybe, just to prevent any actual diddling.

(I'd better stop with the defense - I'll probably attract attention).

"so-called" facts? :lol
 

Kai Dracon

Writing a dinosaur space opera symphony
The thing about MJ is that his extreme eccentricity doomed him forever in the eyes of many people. If God came down and informed everyone that he personally watched Neverland Ranch to ensure that Jackson never laid a single inappropriate finger one child, tons of people would refuse to believe it and just call him a "monster" anyway.

People's views over pedophilia or anything resembling it are so extreme, that it doesn't even matter if Jackson was genuinely messed up in the head through no fault of his own. It's far easier for someone to be forgiven - at least in a detached sense - for cold blooded murder if it happened because they were out of their mind, than for someone to be forgiven even a teensy weensy bit for a pedo-esque incident even if that person was effectively manipulated into it by the circumstances of their entire lives and not very sane by the point.

I don't know if MJ actually did anything remotely like what he was charged with; maybe he did, for all the circumstances sounded like a pure money-grabbing ploy from the various parents. Even if he did, I feel equally sorry for both the children who were hurt by it and for Jackson himself. All evidence that's plain to see points to Michael Jackson having a genuinely tragic life that for all his talent and abilities, hobbled the man before he even reached adulthood.

If anyone wants to rage about "monsters" they would be better served to start at Jackson's father, before Jackson himself.
 

Dali

Member
Souldriver said:
Things like this for example. It might be a joke, and I don't know how BamYouHaveAids has ever reacted to the numerous paedophilia's threads on GAF, but still, it boils down to people making jokes and minimizing paedophilia (or/and acting on it) because he made cool songs. And that's just...not right.

...but he did Thriller.
 

JimmyV

Banned
ultim8p00 said:
It doesn't. It's an aside, which is why it is separate from the rest of the posts. Those statements are clearly independent of each other so I don't see how you could possibly make that connection. l

What? It was in your second "OP". So every line break is a completely unrelated statement?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom