Anyone have any idea where the local savegames are for the demo?
Try ...Documents\Electronic Arts\The Sims 4 Create A Sim DemoAnyone have any idea where the local savegames are for the demo?
What's the point of a sequel if you move backwards.
The Sims are tied to your Origin account isn't it?Try ...DocumentsElectronic ArtsThe Sims 4 Create A Sim Demo
Your Sims are in the Tray folder, but good luck untangling what files are for what Sim.
Sounds like they are just releasing the Sims 2 with a new coat of paint? What's the point of a sequel if you move backwards. Poor maxis such an inglorious death.
Sounds like they are just releasing the Sims 2 with a new coat of paint? What's the point of a sequel if you move backwards. Poor maxis such an inglorious death.
You're not going to at least wait until the reviews and impressions come out?Well I think I am going to stick with the Sims 3. That cut feature list has just killed any excitement I might of otherwise had.
All pre-release hype got sucked out by The Sims 4 revealing itself to be a disappointing bummer. GAF probably isn't too representative of the overall Sims fanbase, but I certainly hope EA will feel the same way about the game's sales.
Censorship ftw!Well this sure fill me with confidence in the upcoming game.
Fansites receive advance copies of The Sims 4 while reviewers don't.
So what this boils down to, essentially, is that that you cannot trust anything said by a fansite about The Sims 4 as it's unclear who has special access and what the terms of that access may be.
Extra special fun. That thread is on the official The Sims forum, and it's anti-stickied. Meaning no matter when the last post is made, it will never rise to the front page. Didn't know that was a thing. Also, it seems very underhanded. Ah well... Streisand Effect, I choose you!
Extra special fun. That thread is on the official The Sims forum, and it's anti-stickied. Meaning no matter when the last post is made, it will never rise to the front page. Didn't know that was a thing. Also, it seems very underhanded. Ah well... Streisand Effect, I choose you!
Yeah none of that is suspicious at all!Well this sure fill me with confidence in the upcoming game.
Fansites receive advance copies of The Sims 4 while reviewers don't.
So what this boils down to, essentially, is that that you cannot trust anything said by a fansite about The Sims 4 as it's unclear who has special access and what the terms of that access may be.
Extra special fun. That thread is on the official The Sims forum, and it's anti-stickied. Meaning no matter when the last post is made, it will never rise to the front page. Didn't know that was a thing. Also, it seems very underhanded. Ah well... Streisand Effect, I choose you!
Yeah none of that is suspicious at all!
Not to deride all fan sites but many of them (simsvip being the most egregious) have been the loudest supporters of the Sims 4 and harassing anyone who posts any negative views about the missing features. So for them to receive advance copies when reviewers haven't is pretty suspect.
Also if I recall Simsvip was the one arguing with an IGN reviewer or fans on twitter when news broke that reviewers wouldn't be getting an advance copy. Simsvip being on EAs side on this. So for them to now receive an advance copy... yeah.
Yep that's what I was thinking about. Other than her not getting the point; I remember reading that at the time and laughing at her definition of 'articles' since her site does a lot of aggregate type stuff and posts links to other site's actual articles. So for her to tout out 600+ articles for simsvip was pretty amusing.Dan Stapleton of IGN observed there won't be pre-release review copies of The Sims 4 and that he 'was getting nervous'. Alexis of SimsVIP fired off a baffling TwitLonger reponse which has since been deleted.
Well this sure fill me with confidence in the upcoming game.
Fansites receive advance copies of The Sims 4 while reviewers don't.
So what this boils down to, essentially, is that that you cannot trust anything said by a fansite about The Sims 4 as it's unclear who has special access and what the terms of that access may be.
Extra special fun. That thread is on the official The Sims forum, and it's anti-stickied. Meaning no matter when the last post is made, it will never rise to the front page. Didn't know that was a thing. Also, it seems very underhanded. Ah well... Streisand Effect, I choose you!
EA has no confidence on their product and are expecting fan-sites to do what they themselves could not. EMBARRASSING by all involved.
EA has no confidence on their product and are expecting fan-sites to do what they themselves could not. EMBARRASSING by all involved.
is it that these gaming sites and magazines don't have the game to review, or they have it but can't release a review until the games released?
They don't have a copy of the game. Which means they have to obtain a copy on release date and then play it and then write their review which could take a few days. This is opposed to how it's normally done where reviewers get the game early and can play it through and write a review ready for or before release.is it that these gaming sites and magazines don't have the game to review, or they have it but can't release a review until the games released?
They don't have a copy of the game. Which means they have to obtain a copy on release date and then play it and then write their review which could take a few days. This is opposed to how it's normally done where reviewers get the game early and can play it through and write a review ready for or before release.
That's why all this is suspect since it looks like EA is trying to hold off any bad reviews till after the game has already come out. So if anyone searches for a review before buying they will either find none, or find glowing reviews from diehard sims fansites.
EA is within their right to do this, but it doesn't make them or the game look very good to people following what's going on.
They don't have a copy of the game. Which means they have to obtain a copy on release date and then play it and then write their review which could take a few days. This is opposed to how it's normally done where reviewers get the game early and can play it through and write a review ready for or before release.
That's why all this is suspect since it looks like EA is trying to hold off any bad reviews till after the game has already come out. So if anyone searches for a review before buying they will either find none, or find glowing reviews from diehard sims fansites.
EA is within their right to do this, but it doesn't make them or the game look very good to people following what's going on.
Well this sure fill me with confidence in the upcoming game.
Fansites receive advance copies of The Sims 4 while reviewers don't.
So what this boils down to, essentially, is that that you cannot trust anything said by a fansite about The Sims 4 as it's unclear who has special access and what the terms of that access may be.
Extra special fun. That thread is on the official The Sims forum, and it's anti-stickied. Meaning no matter when the last post is made, it will never rise to the front page. Didn't know that was a thing. Also, it seems very underhanded. Ah well... Streisand Effect, I choose you!
Yup they just deleted it.It appears that thread got deleted? I can't seem to access it.
lol EA
Well this sure fill me with confidence in the upcoming game.
Fansites receive advance copies of The Sims 4 while reviewers don't.
So what this boils down to, essentially, is that that you cannot trust anything said by a fansite about The Sims 4 as it's unclear who has special access and what the terms of that access may be.
Extra special fun. That thread is on the official The Sims forum, and it's anti-stickied. Meaning no matter when the last post is made, it will never rise to the front page. Didn't know that was a thing. Also, it seems very underhanded. Ah well... Streisand Effect, I choose you!
Are they even trying any more? From what I've seen fansites are the only ones properly defending this thing to the end. It just makes this all so...obvious.Yup they just deleted it.
It'd be funny if it wasn't so transparent. Now? Now it's hilarious.
People here really want professional reviewers to review this game? Really?
Like their opinion ever mattered to this series.
You're not going to at least wait until the reviews and impressions come out?
I feel like the best case scenario for this game is that while it's disappointing it's solid enough so that after an expansion or two it's really good, then I can wait for a bundle deal to get it.
The impressions would have to be universal praise at this point to change my mind. As the cut features lists makes it sound like at launch this game will be a huge step back.
Please do not buy this game