• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The UK votes to leave the European Union

Status
Not open for further replies.

Samarqand

Banned
1oComCX.jpg

1464955369963.jpg

Protesters against Donald Trump chase a man leaving a Trump campaign rally in California. Photo: AP
 

Moosichu

Member
Well, given the EU's virulent dislike of democratic opinion when it runs counter to the EU project, I can quite understand why it'd influence the Remainers in their own opinion.

Leave won. Stop calling for reruns, or decrying how the old or the uninformed got to vote.

The makeup of the EU is entirely decided by the voting population of its respective countries.

The UK got such a good deal and so many opt-outs anyway.

A lot of people regret their vote now as well. It's a mess all round.
 

-Plasma Reus-

Service guarantees member status
Sturgeon will speak soon, after she finishes this cabinet meeting. Expected to address Scottish referendum for independence.
 
Well, given the EU's virulent dislike of democratic opinion when it runs counter to the EU project, I can quite understand why it'd influence the Remainers in their own opinion.

Leave won. Stop calling for reruns, or decrying how the old or the uninformed got to vote.

Yeah a lot of remainers showing true colours. Democracy is great so long as it gives the result they wanted, now they want to change it. This isn't a pair of fucking slacks you've bought from M&S - you can't take the result back and exchange it because you don't like it. Be pissed off , protest, whatever but don't ask for a re-run.
 

2San

Member
Well, given the EU's virulent dislike of democratic opinion when it runs counter to the EU project, I can quite understand why it'd influence the Remainers in their own opinion.

Leave won. Stop calling for reruns, or decrying how the old or the uninformed got to vote.
Who is this EU?
 
"The Leave campaign fucked you over and just about every promise was a lie. Deal with it! Oh, and there's no plan. Never was."

This is getting so farcically bad that I'm getting even more worried that the EU will not learn its lesson. They'll just point and laugh at the incompetence on display, and things continue rolling slowly towards a wider EU failure.
 
Or alternatively the vast majority of people signing the petition voted to Remain in the first place and cannot handle or accept that they lost.

When leave voters realised they have been misled this could get nasty.

Already Farage as debunked the NHS spending.
Already Ukip have said that immigration levels won't go down
Already Daniel Hannan as said that it likely that we would have to accept free movement of people in any deal with the EU.

I think it is a fair thing to say a majority of Leave voters voted on Immigration, putting money into the NHS and that our borders will be closed.

They have been misled. Some have already realised this, some didn't realise what their vote meant, just look at tv reactions from the public.

Also just shy of the population as voted to remain, it is not that many people who seperate the outcome of this vote. tensions and people emotions are understandably high.
 

RedShift

Member
It's unreasonable

Because the people who voted are not the same as the local government hoping to ensure continuity of support for the entire community?

Because for every quid the EU donated to Cornwall or wherever they took two quid from the U.K. Treasury so treasury should be able to replace the funds with the money now not paid to the EU?

Because England decided where eu assistance went, not some foreign guy in Brussels and presumably the arguments for assistance have not changed?

U.K. Was not a recipient of eu aid it was the other way round. I see the twisting logic to inflict pain on leave voters or districts as ends searching for means.

Our economy is going to be damaged enough as a result of the rest of the UK's stupidity. We're already pumping huge amounts of money into these places, why should we pay more of our share of what we stop paying to the EU to them as well?

I don't care about unifying after this referendum. I now longer feel any sense of unity with the Little Englanders. They want to go it alone, let them do it and see how little they really are.
 
What a coincidence that they are telling the public the campaign lied after the voting didn't clarify it in the weeks and months before it.
 

Ashes

Banned
Well, given the EU's virulent dislike of democratic opinion when it runs counter to the EU project, I can quite understand why it'd influence the Remainers in their own opinion.

Leave won. Stop calling for reruns, or decrying how the old or the uninformed got to vote.

To be fair, I've never seen so much regret - or buyer's remorse - be reported across the media.

The only clear differentiator between the two tribes seems to be in the higher education category.
 

Ashes

Banned
Our economy is going to be damaged enough as a result of the rest of the UK's stupidity. We're already pumping huge amounts of money into these places, why should we pay more of our share of what we stop paying to the EU to them as well?

I don't care about unifying after this referendum. I now longer feel any sense of unity with the Little Englanders. They want to go it alone, let them do it and see how little they really are.

You are spewing campaign propaganda? Truly we all lost.
 

Mikeside

Member
The main thing that gets me is that largely areas dependent on the EU voted out, as did older people who also depend on a lot of the services and benefits only really possible because of the EU, foreign investment and immigration.


Now they're all going to demand that London pays for all that gravy. I won't be happy to see those people suffer, but they'll pretty much deserve it and I'm not planning on sticking around to be part of the workforce paying for their bad decisions.
 

Bumhead

Banned
What a coincidence that they are telling the public the campaign lied after the voting didn't clarify it in the weeks and months before it.

Who is they here, exactly?

People think Farage is a tit (rightly so) and call him out as being a lying pig over every claim he makes, yet are choosing to accept his claim about a movement he wasn't a part of (albeit one aiming for roughly the same thing) lying about their campaign.

The leave vote is not a vote for Nigel Farage and neither he personally nor his party have won anything here, and there's not much indication to go on thus far that any direction the country goes in from here will involve him in any way. He's going to be throwing as many spanners in the works of a Boris lead UK out of Europe as he tried to under a Cameron lead Britain in Europe. The £350m might be a lie and Farage might be right about that, but there's a degree of hypocrisy amongst those choosing to just flat out believe him now about this because it suits their agenda.
 
Let's just keep voting till we get it right. That's EU Democracy for you.
Try to see beyond that and tell me why the idea of "more than important than several general elections" referendum not having a minimum turnout or minimum majority are bad things?

It might be too late to do anything about this one but we can make sure things are in place for the future.

Leave folk being Nigel Farage, who funnily enough the Remain side are happy to disregard anything the man says.

We had a fair referendum. Leave won. Remain lost. Deal with it.
Fair in what way? We had the worst politics I've ever seen in the country from both sides that kind of made it clear both were making it up as it goes along. Oh this is "more than important than several general elections" which is why neither party really had a manifesto or even a solid plan and we see it right now with "oh we've got no PM. Who would think a dead man walking wanted to go and die in peace. Guess we'll push the article 50 button by Christmas, we might have a PM to do it by then" shows.
 

Durante

Member
That's not even half true. The quote was from the Vote Leave campaign, while the guy they were interviewing was part of a completely different campaign (Leave.eu).
I never thought I'd see a real life example of the Judean People's Front sketch used as an argument.
 

Ashes

Banned
She's got a nice advantage with Cameron and the Tories in limbo.

She's got an ethical right to protest. But I'm really not sure this is the right way to go about it. The economy is slowing. And the financial markets are volatile.
 
Try to see beyond that and tell me why the idea of "more than important than several general elections" referendum not having a minimum turnout or minimum majority are bad things?

It might be too late to do anything about this one but we can make sure things are in place for the future.


Fair in what way? We had the worst politics I've ever seen in the country from both sides that kind of made it clear both were making it up as it goes along. Oh this is "more than important than several general elections" which is why neither party really had a manifesto or even a solid plan and we see it right now with "oh we've got no PM. Who would think a dead man walking wanted to go and die in peace. Guess we'll push the article 50 button by Christmas, we might have a PM to do it by then" shows.

Where do you set the ceiling? Say they set it at 75% and remain lost, they'd be calling for 80%.
 

Chinner

Banned
The main thing that gets me is that largely areas dependent on the EU voted out, as did older people who also depend on a lot of the services and benefits only really possible because of the EU, foreign investment and immigration.


Now they're all going to demand that London pays for all that gravy. I won't be happy to see those people suffer, but they'll pretty much deserve it and I'm not planning on sticking around to be part of the workforce paying for their bad decisions.
The irony is that these areas received grants from the EU for this reason. They're going to remain deprived as all efforts are focused on London to try and make it remain relevant internationally.
 

Zelias

Banned
As a Yorkshireman, the thought that we can somehow convince London to make up the funding shortfall from the EU is hilarious. We don't usually trust London worth a damn but they'll certainly come through for us this time!

I'm only laughing because the alternative is despair.
 

oti

Banned
French foreign minister: "Negotiations will start immediately (art. 50). Cameron has to live with the consequences."
 
That's not even half true. The quote was from the Vote Leave campaign, while the guy they were interviewing was part of a completely different campaign (Leave.eu).

And yet he said NOTHING about it until after the vote. He was implicit with the lies. If he really cared about honesty and a fair referendum that wasn't misleading the masses then he would have pointed out it wasn't true during the campaigning and specifically said he didn't agree with it. But he didn't do that. He went along with the whole thing.
 

Arksy

Member
I never thought I'd see a real life example of the Judean People's Front sketch used as an argument.

LOL. Ok this slayed me.

And yet he said NOTHING about it until after the vote. He was implicit with the lies. If he really cared about honesty and a fair referendum that wasn't misleading the masses then he would have pointed out it wasn't true during the campaigning and specifically said he didn't agree with it. But he didn't do that. He went along with the whole thing.

He didn't print it, he didn't say it, to assign responsibility to him for it and then call him out on it is incredibly disingenuous. It's not his responsibility to do anything about the leaflet.
 

-Plasma Reus-

Service guarantees member status
She's got an ethical right to protest. But I'm really not sure this is the right way to go about it. The economy is slowing. And the financial markets are volatile.
This is the perfect opportunity and the right thing to do for Scottish people, and that is her primary concern.
 

PJV3

Member
She's got an ethical right to protest. But I'm really not sure this is the right way to go about it. The economy is slowing. And the financial markets are volatile.


She can begin negotiations, Scotland doesn't Need to act fully but she can get a lot done.
 

Baybars

Banned
From the comments from Johnson and pro brexitiers tories since yesterday it's clear that

A) they have absolutely no clue what to do and there's no plan at the political level for what happens next
B) they never expected to be in this position

Hell you just had Hannan saying maybe we'd still have free movement. Evan Davis near launched himself across the table.

A shower of absolute chancers

They wanted to take back control though! Well here's your chance guys.
 
Sturgeon can bang on all she wants without authorisation from Westminster an independence referendum holds no legal weight.

We need unity more than ever just now. This just causes greater divisions
 

Joni

Member
eh 2 years is a long time for an exit strategy anyway

That is a maximum of two years. Anything that is not arranged by then? You just get kicked out without a deal.

Sturgeon can bang on all she wants without authorisation from Westminster an independence referendum holds no legal weight.

Countries can always try to declare independence. It is up to the rest of the world to see if they accept. England can't stop that. They might block it from the United Nations, but the United States might push back them on that.
 

Crumpo

Member
That's pretty much the feeling in my house.

Same. My wife and I work in financial services (not in London) and contribute much more (financially) to the UK economy than we take back. We voted to remain and it feels like we are being dragged into something ugly that we didn't want. I feel divided with the populace that has called for this, not united with them as people are calling for. If I had a vocal racist living next door I would at best ignore him and at worst decry him or eventually move house.

On the financial side, "get our money back from the EU fat cats, har har" leaving I think is the only way I can make a personal difference to the leave voters - we'll take our expertise (and Tax/NI contributions/consumer spending) into the EU.
 
Can someone either explain or link me to an article that explains why the Scottish vote was so heavily in favour of remain. I haven't really been following that aspect of this whole issue.
 

-Plasma Reus-

Service guarantees member status
Sturgeon can bang on all she wants without authorisation from Westminster an independence referendum holds no legal weight.

We need unity more than ever just now. This just causes greater divisions
Scotland doesn't need Westminsters legal approval and Westminster is more likely to accept it anyway.Otherwise it will go from a disunion to a serious issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom