If you had to compare it to another game of this style what would be the closest.
Same question to you aswell but also what did you think of Skyrims combat as a comparison.
Same for you as well and which game is it closest to and what would you consider a good combat game in his style.
I think though Skyrim is no major contender for combat that its better than W3. In Skyrim when you start getting powerful the game does a great job providing that feedback, plus few things are as great as sniping someone with an arrow in Skyrim and seeing them fly like they were hit with a Ballista.
The Witcher is different in that its badly executed. Your movement is slow and has this weird floaty feeling. There is a constant disconnect between Geralt and the environment he is in.
Input lag is a very real thing as well and at least on consoles can be really frustrating when your used to having a responsive character especially coming from something like Bloodborne.
Humans are the only thing in the game that feel satisfying to fight because they are encumbered by all the same issues you experience as a player. They are slow and allow you the time to plan your attacks. Its when the game introduces monsters with large AOF attacks and swarming patterns that it just gets exhausting because your reduced to just dodging haphazardly out of the way until a small opening happens using your magic to push threats away and swinging hoping you can get the hell out after you connect before the endless swarms hit you again.
I can't compare it to anything cause I have never played something badly executed.
Maybe a really slow Assassins Creed that used remote play as your primary input.
Even though the combat is bad the story is so excellent that I find myself completely consumed with it. I love all the side quests and the inventiveness in the world and lore. Its sublime. Its just a shame actually playing it is such a far cry from the polish seen elsewhere.